From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2632B4963C3; Tue, 9 Jun 2026 15:55:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1781020526; cv=none; b=KnJDm6bt/+d19KaNQdzFxRnCO2qkeOQAW9/tkFl3kqj2Hpwre7998Z2xq+rkcL+geXiNZF3zqOgaDgJlU3WJMOsBHcksntYSCzRA8t/qFP15GyUMeyFEwGbplZP3HYkeUwRb/h6FXD4UFtte/4nNP0gciznmFRVlCu4qRk0VuWw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1781020526; c=relaxed/simple; bh=QMLncm3QZNbzA9IjyGg+4yTlxR5sZfMyRYZbVdKowTU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Hm+juc7u7nQumf5tSYJxyKm3K88MkT0cn3VAKl8d0eY5k+TQ/xCoe4fQ3nrBfsosWjvlZmm/z6T+HGbJ34Kitm7Ij+lApa2uJVsl0gDwGIrlPn4H7+/2LcgseEEKXxz/mEDpR7TH3C7zLlVA/kxQxStQVPP+DX2ESoTC/t2g7T0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=hHxclXE6; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="hHxclXE6" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7ACA31F00893; Tue, 9 Jun 2026 15:55:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1781020524; bh=ZbzCK1HDZ6UQM0wxmODd5gt3PhXikPzvdF+pmduOMD4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=hHxclXE61EFMwxcZZ4ijcKdmZQrXuHFpw/8CotX43ijEM7cIj8eoOWyMjiEpkQs9z 8s+wxGuYEcL7qIWh2PuqYhtJ6sViwxkpG7ntvpgu2+iqzL+PKZjbAqlVXkOA9EB3JM RXOop81ORKUegIcXQm2xuJUzqk3dxVGZP+7fF5udRvb4yV+c/UJA45i5eC40GfmVU7 DatfDIxUwYt+satO6eHDulTBroOMM0WfB/mOWLojxGfwT4BDyImoIC9N801qlUZf0D TE0DXAd/e0ONGvRHfe6p72N+i7y/1poMqooU5WCKSx9FexX1x+6j+rR0jpJR23Q5/I ZOJgu/CycSMNg== From: Pratyush Yadav To: George Guo Cc: Mike Rapoport , Huacai Chen , Pasha Tatashin , Pratyush Yadav , Shuah Khan , WANG Xuerui , Alexander Graf , loongarch@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, George Guo Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] LoongArch: add KHO support and selftests In-Reply-To: <20260609143945.512688-1-dongtai.guo@linux.dev> (George Guo's message of "Tue, 9 Jun 2026 22:39:45 +0800") References: <20260601092823.110362-1-dongtai.guo@linux.dev> <20260609143945.512688-1-dongtai.guo@linux.dev> Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2026 17:55:21 +0200 Message-ID: <2vxzbjdjso7q.fsf@kernel.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Tue, Jun 09 2026, George Guo wrote: > Hi Mike, Huacai, > > Gentle ping on this v3. In the v2 review you mentioned you'd wait for > v3 for a more detailed look -- v3 addresses both points (folded the two > selftest patches into one, and replaced the LoongArch-specific kill > loop with timeout(1), with the timeout value set per-arch in the conf). > > No rush, just making sure it didn't slip through the cracks. Happy to > spin a rebase if it's gone stale. It is on my review list, and I hope to get to it soon. But no promises unfortunately. -- Regards, Pratyush Yadav