From: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>
To: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, rppt@kernel.org,
shuah@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
dmatlack@google.com, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
pratyush@kernel.org, skhawaja@google.com, graf@amazon.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] selftests/liveupdate: Test session and file limit removal
Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 16:04:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2vxzse7wafmo.fsf@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260414200237.444170-4-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com> (Pasha Tatashin's message of "Tue, 14 Apr 2026 20:02:35 +0000")
On Tue, Apr 14 2026, Pasha Tatashin wrote:
> With the removal of static limits on the number of sessions and files per
> session, the orchestrator now uses dynamic allocation.
>
> Add new test cases to verify that the system can handle a large number of
> sessions and files. These tests ensure that the dynamic block allocation
> and reuse logic for session metadata and outgoing files work correctly
> beyond the previous static limits.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
> ---
> .../testing/selftests/liveupdate/liveupdate.c | 99 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 99 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/liveupdate/liveupdate.c b/tools/testing/selftests/liveupdate/liveupdate.c
> index 37c808fbe1e9..0eaf97b19267 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/liveupdate/liveupdate.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/liveupdate/liveupdate.c
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
> #include <fcntl.h>
> #include <string.h>
> #include <sys/ioctl.h>
> +#include <sys/resource.h>
> #include <unistd.h>
>
> #include <linux/liveupdate.h>
> @@ -386,4 +387,102 @@ TEST_F(liveupdate_device, prevent_double_preservation)
> ASSERT_EQ(close(session_fd2), 0);
> }
>
> +static void ensure_nofile_limit(struct __test_metadata *_metadata,
> + long min_limit)
> +{
> + struct rlimit hl;
> +
> + if (getrlimit(RLIMIT_NOFILE, &hl) < 0)
> + ksft_exit_fail_msg("getrlimit failed: %s\n", strerror(errno));
> +
> + if (hl.rlim_cur >= min_limit)
> + return;
> +
> + hl.rlim_cur = min_limit;
> + if (hl.rlim_cur > hl.rlim_max)
> + hl.rlim_max = hl.rlim_cur;
> +
> + if (setrlimit(RLIMIT_NOFILE, &hl) < 0) {
> + if (errno == EPERM) {
> + SKIP(return, "Insufficient privileges to set RLIMIT_NOFILE to %ld",
> + hl.rlim_cur);
> + }
> + ksft_exit_fail_msg("setrlimit to %ld failed: %s\n",
> + hl.rlim_cur, strerror(errno));
> + }
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Test Case: Manage Many Sessions
> + *
> + * Verifies that a large number of sessions can be created and then
> + * destroyed during normal system operation. This specifically tests the
> + * dynamic block allocation and reuse logic for session metadata management
> + * without preserving any files.
> + */
> +TEST_F(liveupdate_device, preserve_many_sessions)
> +{
> +#define MANY_SESSIONS 2000
> + int session_fds[MANY_SESSIONS];
> + int i;
> +
> + self->fd1 = open(LIVEUPDATE_DEV, O_RDWR);
> + if (self->fd1 < 0 && errno == ENOENT)
> + SKIP(return, "%s does not exist", LIVEUPDATE_DEV);
> + ASSERT_GE(self->fd1, 0);
> +
> + ensure_nofile_limit(_metadata, MANY_SESSIONS + 10);
> + if (_metadata->exit_code == KSFT_SKIP)
> + return;
Nit: This is strange. Why not just return errno in ensure_nofile_limit()
and handle the skipping here? Same below.
LGTM otherwise.
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < MANY_SESSIONS; i++) {
> + char name[64];
> +
> + snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "many-session-%d", i);
> + session_fds[i] = create_session(self->fd1, name);
> + ASSERT_GE(session_fds[i], 0);
> + }
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < MANY_SESSIONS; i++)
> + ASSERT_EQ(close(session_fds[i]), 0);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Test Case: Preserve Many Files
> + *
> + * Verifies that a large number of files can be preserved in a single session
> + * and then destroyed during normal system operation. This tests the dynamic
> + * block allocation and management for outgoing files.
> + */
> +TEST_F(liveupdate_device, preserve_many_files)
> +{
> +#define MANY_FILES 500
> + int mem_fds[MANY_FILES];
> + int session_fd;
> + int i;
> +
> + self->fd1 = open(LIVEUPDATE_DEV, O_RDWR);
> + if (self->fd1 < 0 && errno == ENOENT)
> + SKIP(return, "%s does not exist", LIVEUPDATE_DEV);
> + ASSERT_GE(self->fd1, 0);
> +
> + session_fd = create_session(self->fd1, "many-files-test");
> + ASSERT_GE(session_fd, 0);
> +
> + ensure_nofile_limit(_metadata, MANY_FILES + 10);
> + if (_metadata->exit_code == KSFT_SKIP)
> + return;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < MANY_FILES; i++) {
> + mem_fds[i] = memfd_create("test-memfd", 0);
> + ASSERT_GE(mem_fds[i], 0);
> + ASSERT_EQ(preserve_fd(session_fd, mem_fds[i], i), 0);
> + }
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < MANY_FILES; i++)
> + ASSERT_EQ(close(mem_fds[i]), 0);
> +
> + ASSERT_EQ(close(session_fd), 0);
> +}
> +
> TEST_HARNESS_MAIN
--
Regards,
Pratyush Yadav
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-12 14:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-14 20:02 [PATCH 0/5] liveupdate: Remove limits on the number of files and sessions Pasha Tatashin
2026-04-14 20:02 ` [PATCH 1/5] liveupdate: Remove limit on the number of sessions Pasha Tatashin
2026-04-15 0:05 ` yanjun.zhu
2026-04-15 0:14 ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-04-20 4:32 ` Zhu Yanjun
2026-04-20 4:45 ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-04-20 7:13 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-04-20 13:26 ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-05-12 13:35 ` Pratyush Yadav
2026-05-12 15:55 ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-04-14 20:02 ` [PATCH 2/5] liveupdate: Remove limit on the number of files per session Pasha Tatashin
2026-05-12 13:58 ` Pratyush Yadav
2026-05-12 20:06 ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-04-14 20:02 ` [PATCH 3/5] selftests/liveupdate: Test session and file limit removal Pasha Tatashin
2026-05-12 14:04 ` Pratyush Yadav [this message]
2026-05-12 20:13 ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-04-14 20:02 ` [PATCH 4/5] selftests/liveupdate: Add stress-sessions kexec test Pasha Tatashin
2026-05-12 14:09 ` Pratyush Yadav
2026-05-12 20:41 ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-04-14 20:02 ` [PATCH 5/5] selftests/liveupdate: Add stress-files " Pasha Tatashin
2026-05-12 14:10 ` Pratyush Yadav
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2vxzse7wafmo.fsf@kernel.org \
--to=pratyush@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=graf@amazon.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=skhawaja@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox