From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 554CCECAAD5 for ; Mon, 12 Sep 2022 10:06:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229947AbiILKGa (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Sep 2022 06:06:30 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43802 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230020AbiILKG0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Sep 2022 06:06:26 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4921B1A3B2; Mon, 12 Sep 2022 03:06:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0127361.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 28C8tDD9030287; Mon, 12 Sep 2022 10:06:17 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=message-id : subject : from : reply-to : to : cc : date : in-reply-to : references : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=pp1; bh=klkeUedZzOD8HNa/htDaTso+jLdfKWnvnnAbZyswICc=; b=QC5zDos/X3F+5IkPZt6vDyld6RZFAO6AH+RFCgonk+Z5ZRnWwJDXGlnPniYugn9UYVtc nQUIdKjmeH++mBpR9vzaJHtAHmoU1ttXL7drj56BZzKoZ9HDKzolz5OdI0H7HpDzzsHP osOKhODCxkMzHySBVOLxnoRGVKBROVp8m8MAtyEDNICclwlgvfNBs5+nEn4UGo3bjkpQ Vh+E2V/46kXKMabRkcUybScj0wY1Xqh0Inudy/kdbQ2nHK1bFl/8XrcR3JfbsejqwiGz J/b2N6mutl9BW2KBusAZNrdzm4hjTwggFMn7cnU2/EkFFeuXsSAxHnH6NtjIscPBKgZ3 RQ== Received: from ppma03fra.de.ibm.com (6b.4a.5195.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [149.81.74.107]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3jhyv85xed-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 12 Sep 2022 10:06:17 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma03fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma03fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 28CA5nGG022219; Mon, 12 Sep 2022 10:06:15 GMT Received: from b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.26.192]) by ppma03fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3jgj78smhq-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 12 Sep 2022 10:06:15 +0000 Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.59]) by b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 28CA2W2s16056720 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 12 Sep 2022 10:02:32 GMT Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E411A4053; Mon, 12 Sep 2022 10:06:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 751B5A4051; Mon, 12 Sep 2022 10:06:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from tarunpc (unknown [9.43.18.53]) by d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Sep 2022 10:06:11 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <32851d30c124e1a499edf3d8c7c0cf0cd04735cc.camel@linux.ibm.com> Subject: Re: [LTP] [RFC PATCH] Hugetlb: Migrating hugetlb tests from libhugetlbfs From: Tarun Sahu Reply-To: tsahu@linux.ibm.com To: Cyril Hrubis Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2022 15:36:10 +0530 In-Reply-To: References: <20220908173947.17956-1-tsahu@linux.ibm.com> <2412537e2e07ebf62fe95971a3022336cde9833a.camel@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5 (3.28.5-18.el8) X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: UfbPtEGr12zhGuYnAJg1hGetJ9yIqOwZ X-Proofpoint-GUID: UfbPtEGr12zhGuYnAJg1hGetJ9yIqOwZ Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Proofpoint-UnRewURL: 0 URL was un-rewritten MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.895,Hydra:6.0.528,FMLib:17.11.122.1 definitions=2022-09-12_06,2022-09-12_01,2022-06-22_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 priorityscore=1501 adultscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 lowpriorityscore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 suspectscore=0 clxscore=1015 malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2207270000 definitions=main-2209120033 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Hi, Thanks for confirming. There is one more confirmation I required before I submit a patch series on necessary libhugetlbfs tests, Between LTP and Kselftests, Choosing LTP is right decision? (mentioned details in patch description) Thanks On Mon, 2022-09-12 at 10:43 +0200, Cyril Hrubis wrote: > Hi! > > As mentioned in the patch description, there is a conflict in > > license, > > That is why, I have avoided to put any of them in the header. Once > > confirmed within the community, I can add the original license > > here. > > (GPL2.1+) as > > https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/wiki/Test-Writing-Guidelines > > this says only to add code with GPL2.0+. > > As far as I can tell there is no GPL2.1+ the only 2.1 version in > existence is LGPL. > > GPL2.1+ usually happens to be an error when someone takes library > header > with LGPL2.1+ license and removes the "Lesser" part. > > However it looks like the whole libhugetlbfs is under LGPL2.1+ which > kind of makes sense for a library, but not so much for the tests > since > these do not provide a library that can be linked againts at all. >