From: Zhu Yanjun <yanjun.zhu@linux.dev>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
"yanjun.zhu@linux.dev" <yanjun.zhu@linux.dev>
Cc: jgg@ziepe.ca, zyjzyj2000@gmail.com, shuah@kernel.org,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] RDMA/nldev: Add dellink function pointer
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2026 22:09:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <434a9a8c-f369-435a-b8bf-d9ae85558c8e@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e8e1fc5b-7772-40c5-8214-b4f9d4a10d98@linux.dev>
在 2026/3/11 20:59, Zhu Yanjun 写道:
>
> 在 2026/3/11 19:04, David Ahern 写道:
>> On 3/11/26 4:01 PM, Yanjun.Zhu wrote:
>>
>>> Got it. The commit log explains how the netdev_notifier mechanism is
>> netdev notifiers are the NETDEV_UNREGISTER and friends. This dellink
>> handler is not related to that; this is an IB stack thing when the rxe
>> link is removed.
>>
>>> used to clean up the related resources.
>>>
>>> In the source code, additional comments have been added to explain how
>>> the dellink operation for rxe is triggered. For iWARP, this change
>>> should not make any difference because iWARP does not implement the
>>> dellink function.
>>>
>>> The commit is shown below. Please take a look and share your comments.
>>> If you agree, I will send out the latest commits out very soon.
>>>
>>> From c05038dcdf69c5985837736a8926ba76d9f3e8e4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>> From: Zhu Yanjun <yanjun.zhu@linux.dev>
>>> Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2022 16:52:45 +0000
>>> Subject: [PATCH 1/1] RDMA/nldev: Add dellink function pointer
>>>
>>> The newlink function pointer was previously added to support
>>> dynamic RDMA link creation. In the RXE driver, this path creates
>>> a transport socket listening on port 4791. Consequently, a dellink
>>> function pointer is required to ensure these sockets are properly
>>> closed when a user administratively removes a link via rdma link
>>> delete <dev>.
>>>
>>> Furthermore, RXE does not rely solely on this nldev path for resource
>>> management. It also monitors the underlying net_device state via a
>>> registered netdev_notifier. The rxe_net_event callback serves as a
>>> fallback mechanism to ensure that transport sockets are forcibly closed
>>> and all resources are released even if dellink is not explicitly called
>>> (e.g., if the parent NIC interface is removed or the driver is
>>> forcefully
>>> unloaded).
>> IMHO, this explanation belongs in the patch that implements dellink
>> for rxe.
>>
>> This patch adds the handler to allow link implementations to cleanup any
>> resources created by newklink as needed.
> Thanks for the feedback. I agree that the detailed explanation of
> RXE's resource management (like sockets and notifiers) is more
> appropriate for the subsequent patch that implements the RXE dellink
> handler.
>
> I will update the commit message for this patch to focus solely on the
> addition of the dellink infrastructure in the RDMA core, and move the
> RXE-specific details to the next patch in the series.
Hi,
I would like to use the following as the commit log. It seems simple and
direct.
"
Add a dellink function pointer to rdma_link_ops to allow drivers to
clean up resources created during newlink.
"
Thanks,
Zhu Yanjun
>
> Zhu Yanjun
>
>>
--
Best Regards,
Yanjun.Zhu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-12 5:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-10 2:05 [PATCH v5 0/4] RDMA/rxe: Add the support that rxe can work in net namespace Zhu Yanjun
2026-03-10 2:05 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] RDMA/nldev: Add dellink function pointer Zhu Yanjun
2026-03-10 15:47 ` David Ahern
2026-03-10 19:01 ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-03-11 1:58 ` Yanjun.Zhu
2026-03-11 8:54 ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-03-11 22:01 ` Yanjun.Zhu
2026-03-11 22:09 ` Yanjun.Zhu
2026-03-12 2:04 ` David Ahern
2026-03-12 3:59 ` Zhu Yanjun
2026-03-12 5:09 ` Zhu Yanjun [this message]
2026-03-12 18:04 ` Yanjun.Zhu
2026-03-10 2:05 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] RDMA/rxe: Add net namespace support for IPv4/IPv6 sockets Zhu Yanjun
2026-03-10 15:48 ` David Ahern
2026-03-10 2:05 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] RDMA/rxe: Support RDMA link creation and destruction per net namespace Zhu Yanjun
2026-03-10 15:48 ` David Ahern
2026-03-10 18:57 ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-03-10 20:32 ` Yanjun.Zhu
2026-03-11 8:45 ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-03-11 19:08 ` Yanjun.Zhu
2026-03-10 2:05 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] RDMA/rxe: Add testcase for net namespace rxe Zhu Yanjun
2026-03-10 15:49 ` David Ahern
2026-03-10 18:53 ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-03-10 21:01 ` Yanjun.Zhu
2026-03-11 8:51 ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-03-11 22:51 ` Yanjun.Zhu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=434a9a8c-f369-435a-b8bf-d9ae85558c8e@linux.dev \
--to=yanjun.zhu@linux.dev \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=zyjzyj2000@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox