Linux Kernel Selftest development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zhu Yanjun <yanjun.zhu@linux.dev>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
	Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
	"yanjun.zhu@linux.dev" <yanjun.zhu@linux.dev>
Cc: jgg@ziepe.ca, zyjzyj2000@gmail.com, shuah@kernel.org,
	linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] RDMA/nldev: Add dellink function pointer
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2026 22:09:09 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <434a9a8c-f369-435a-b8bf-d9ae85558c8e@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e8e1fc5b-7772-40c5-8214-b4f9d4a10d98@linux.dev>


在 2026/3/11 20:59, Zhu Yanjun 写道:
>
> 在 2026/3/11 19:04, David Ahern 写道:
>> On 3/11/26 4:01 PM, Yanjun.Zhu wrote:
>>
>>> Got it. The commit log explains how the netdev_notifier mechanism is
>> netdev notifiers are the NETDEV_UNREGISTER and friends. This dellink
>> handler is not related to that; this is an IB stack thing when the rxe
>> link is removed.
>>
>>> used to clean up the related resources.
>>>
>>> In the source code, additional comments have been added to explain how
>>> the dellink operation for rxe is triggered. For iWARP, this change
>>> should not make any difference because iWARP does not implement the
>>> dellink function.
>>>
>>> The commit is shown below. Please take a look and share your comments.
>>> If you agree, I will send out the latest commits out very soon.
>>>
>>>  From c05038dcdf69c5985837736a8926ba76d9f3e8e4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>> From: Zhu Yanjun <yanjun.zhu@linux.dev>
>>> Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2022 16:52:45 +0000
>>> Subject: [PATCH 1/1] RDMA/nldev: Add dellink function pointer
>>>
>>> The newlink function pointer was previously added to support
>>> dynamic RDMA link creation. In the RXE driver, this path creates
>>> a transport socket listening on port 4791. Consequently, a dellink
>>> function pointer is required to ensure these sockets are properly
>>> closed when a user administratively removes a link via rdma link
>>> delete <dev>.
>>>
>>> Furthermore, RXE does not rely solely on this nldev path for resource
>>> management. It also monitors the underlying net_device state via a
>>> registered netdev_notifier. The rxe_net_event callback serves as a
>>> fallback mechanism to ensure that transport sockets are forcibly closed
>>> and all resources are released even if dellink is not explicitly called
>>> (e.g., if the parent NIC interface is removed or the driver is 
>>> forcefully
>>> unloaded).
>> IMHO, this explanation belongs in the patch that implements dellink 
>> for rxe.
>>
>> This patch adds the handler to allow link implementations to cleanup any
>> resources created by newklink as needed.
> Thanks for the feedback. I agree that the detailed explanation of 
> RXE's resource management (like sockets and notifiers) is more 
> appropriate for the subsequent patch that implements the RXE dellink 
> handler.
>
> I will update the commit message for this patch to focus solely on the 
> addition of the dellink infrastructure in the RDMA core, and move the 
> RXE-specific details to the next patch in the series.

Hi,

I would like to use the following as the commit log. It seems simple and 
direct.

"

Add a dellink function pointer to rdma_link_ops to allow drivers to 
clean up resources created during newlink.
"

Thanks,

Zhu Yanjun


>
> Zhu Yanjun
>
>>
-- 
Best Regards,
Yanjun.Zhu


  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-12  5:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-10  2:05 [PATCH v5 0/4] RDMA/rxe: Add the support that rxe can work in net namespace Zhu Yanjun
2026-03-10  2:05 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] RDMA/nldev: Add dellink function pointer Zhu Yanjun
2026-03-10 15:47   ` David Ahern
2026-03-10 19:01   ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-03-11  1:58     ` Yanjun.Zhu
2026-03-11  8:54       ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-03-11 22:01         ` Yanjun.Zhu
2026-03-11 22:09           ` Yanjun.Zhu
2026-03-12  2:04           ` David Ahern
2026-03-12  3:59             ` Zhu Yanjun
2026-03-12  5:09               ` Zhu Yanjun [this message]
2026-03-12 18:04                 ` Yanjun.Zhu
2026-03-10  2:05 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] RDMA/rxe: Add net namespace support for IPv4/IPv6 sockets Zhu Yanjun
2026-03-10 15:48   ` David Ahern
2026-03-10  2:05 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] RDMA/rxe: Support RDMA link creation and destruction per net namespace Zhu Yanjun
2026-03-10 15:48   ` David Ahern
2026-03-10 18:57   ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-03-10 20:32     ` Yanjun.Zhu
2026-03-11  8:45       ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-03-11 19:08         ` Yanjun.Zhu
2026-03-10  2:05 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] RDMA/rxe: Add testcase for net namespace rxe Zhu Yanjun
2026-03-10 15:49   ` David Ahern
2026-03-10 18:53   ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-03-10 21:01     ` Yanjun.Zhu
2026-03-11  8:51       ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-03-11 22:51         ` Yanjun.Zhu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=434a9a8c-f369-435a-b8bf-d9ae85558c8e@linux.dev \
    --to=yanjun.zhu@linux.dev \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=zyjzyj2000@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox