Re: [PATCH V2 13/13] selftests/resctrl: Keep results from first test run

["Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4587 bytes --]

On Thu, 12 Sep 2024, Reinette Chatre wrote:

> The resctrl selftests drop the results from every first test run
> to avoid (per comment) "inaccurate due to monitoring setup transition
> phase" data. Previously inaccurate data resulted from workloads needing
> some time to "settle" and also the measurements themselves to
> account for earlier measurements to measure across needed timeframe.
> 
> commit da50de0a92f3 ("selftests/resctrl: Calculate resctrl FS derived mem
> bw over sleep(1) only")
> 
> ensured that measurements accurately measure just the time frame of
> interest. The default "fill_buf" benchmark since separated the buffer
> prepare phase from the benchmark run phase reducing the need for the
> tests themselves to accommodate the benchmark's "settle" time.
> 
> With these enhancements there are no remaining portions needing
> to "settle" and the first test run can contribute to measurements.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
> ---
> Changes since V1:
> - Remove comment about needing results from first run removed.
> - Fix existing incorrect spacing while changing line.
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cmt_test.c |  5 ++---
>  tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mba_test.c | 10 +++-------
>  tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mbm_test.c | 10 +++-------
>  3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cmt_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cmt_test.c
> index a7effe76b419..d4b85d144985 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cmt_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cmt_test.c
> @@ -99,14 +99,13 @@ static int check_results(struct resctrl_val_param *param, size_t span, int no_of
>  		}
>  
>  		/* Field 3 is llc occ resc value */
> -		if (runs > 0)
> -			sum_llc_occu_resc += strtoul(token_array[3], NULL, 0);
> +		sum_llc_occu_resc += strtoul(token_array[3], NULL, 0);
>  		runs++;
>  	}
>  	fclose(fp);
>  
>  	return show_results_info(sum_llc_occu_resc, no_of_bits, span,
> -				 MAX_DIFF, MAX_DIFF_PERCENT, runs - 1, true);
> +				 MAX_DIFF, MAX_DIFF_PERCENT, runs, true);
>  }
>  
>  static void cmt_test_cleanup(void)
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mba_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mba_test.c
> index 5c6063d0a77c..89c2446b9f80 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mba_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mba_test.c
> @@ -86,18 +86,14 @@ static bool show_mba_info(unsigned long *bw_imc, unsigned long *bw_resc)
>  		int avg_diff_per;
>  		float avg_diff;
>  
> -		/*
> -		 * The first run is discarded due to inaccurate value from
> -		 * phase transition.
> -		 */
> -		for (runs = NUM_OF_RUNS * allocation + 1;
> +		for (runs = NUM_OF_RUNS * allocation;
>  		     runs < NUM_OF_RUNS * allocation + NUM_OF_RUNS ; runs++) {
>  			sum_bw_imc += bw_imc[runs];
>  			sum_bw_resc += bw_resc[runs];
>  		}
>  
> -		avg_bw_imc = sum_bw_imc / (NUM_OF_RUNS - 1);
> -		avg_bw_resc = sum_bw_resc / (NUM_OF_RUNS - 1);
> +		avg_bw_imc = sum_bw_imc / NUM_OF_RUNS;
> +		avg_bw_resc = sum_bw_resc / NUM_OF_RUNS;
>  		if (avg_bw_imc < THROTTLE_THRESHOLD || avg_bw_resc < THROTTLE_THRESHOLD) {
>  			ksft_print_msg("Bandwidth below threshold (%d MiB). Dropping results from MBA schemata %u.\n",
>  				       THROTTLE_THRESHOLD,
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mbm_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mbm_test.c
> index 7635ee6b9339..8c818e292dce 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mbm_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mbm_test.c
> @@ -22,17 +22,13 @@ show_bw_info(unsigned long *bw_imc, unsigned long *bw_resc, size_t span)
>  	int runs, ret, avg_diff_per;
>  	float avg_diff = 0;
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * Discard the first value which is inaccurate due to monitoring setup
> -	 * transition phase.
> -	 */
> -	for (runs = 1; runs < NUM_OF_RUNS ; runs++) {
> +	for (runs = 0; runs < NUM_OF_RUNS; runs++) {
>  		sum_bw_imc += bw_imc[runs];
>  		sum_bw_resc += bw_resc[runs];
>  	}
>  
> -	avg_bw_imc = sum_bw_imc / 4;
> -	avg_bw_resc = sum_bw_resc / 4;
> +	avg_bw_imc = sum_bw_imc / NUM_OF_RUNS;
> +	avg_bw_resc = sum_bw_resc / NUM_OF_RUNS;
>  	avg_diff = (float)labs(avg_bw_resc - avg_bw_imc) / avg_bw_imc;
>  	avg_diff_per = (int)(avg_diff * 100);

While the patch itself is fine, I notice the code has this magic number 
gem too:

        unsigned long bw_imc[1024], bw_resc[1024];

Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>


-- 
 i.