From: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>, David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>,
Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
KUnit Development <kunit-dev@googlegroups.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kunit: tool: Force the use of the 'tty' console for UML
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2021 11:13:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <578de82c-5119-78e4-4497-c8a8d642388d@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <X/c8jQMyXbsJf85M@alley>
On 1/7/21 9:53 AM, Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Wed 2021-01-06 12:29:12, David Gow wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 3:52 AM Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 1/5/21 11:57 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 09:34:33AM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
>>>>> On 1/5/21 9:21 AM, Petr Mladek wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon 2021-01-04 09:23:57, Shuah Khan wrote:
>>>>>>> On 12/22/20 4:11 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 11:39:00PM -0800, David Gow wrote:
>>>>>>>>> kunit_tool relies on the UML console outputting printk() output to the
>>>>>>>>> tty in order to get results. Since the default console driver could
>>>>>>>>> change, pass 'console=tty' to the kernel.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This is triggered by a change[1] to use ttynull as a fallback console
>>>>>>>>> driver which -- by chance or by design -- seems to have changed the
>>>>>>>>> default console output on UML, breaking kunit_tool. While this may be
>>>>>>>>> fixed, we should be less fragile to such changes in the default.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [1]:
>>>>>>>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=757055ae8dedf5333af17b3b5b4b70ba9bc9da4e
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Reported-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
>>>>>>>> Tested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thank you all. Now in linux-kselftest kunit-fixes branch.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Will send this up for rc3.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sorry for the delay - have been away from the keyboard for a
>>>>>>> bit.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> JFYI, I am not sure that this is the right solution. I am
>>>>>> looking into it, see
>>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/X%2FSRA1P8t+ONZFKb@alley/
>>>>>> for more details.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks Petr. I will hold off on sending the patch up to Linus and
>>>>> let you find a the right solution.
>>>>
>>>> Please. leave it in Linux Next at least. Otherwise kunit will be broken for a
>>>> long time which is not good.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yes. That is the plan. It will be in there until real fix comes in.
>
> The real fix would be too complicated for 5.11-rc3. Instead, I
> proposed to revert the problematic commit, see
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210107164400.17904-2-pmladek@suse.com/
> I would like to push it for 5.11-rc3.
>
>> Personally, I think that this patch makes some sense to keep even if
>> the underlying issue with ttynull is resolved. Given that kunit.py
>> requires the console output, explicitly stating we want console=tty
>> set is probably worth doing rather than relying on it being the
>> default.
>
> I agree that the patch makes sense on its own. kunit depends on the
> particular console. Note that "tty" is actually the UML-specific
> stdio console implemented in arch/um/drivers/stdio_console.c.
>
The proposal sounds like revert the problem commit
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210107164400.17904-2-pmladek@suse.com/
and also send kunit fix up. Sounds reasonable to me. I will send
it for 5.11-rc3
thanks,
-- Shuah
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-07 18:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-22 7:39 [PATCH] kunit: tool: Force the use of the 'tty' console for UML David Gow
2020-12-22 11:11 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-01-04 16:23 ` Shuah Khan
2021-01-05 16:21 ` Petr Mladek
2021-01-05 16:34 ` Shuah Khan
2021-01-05 18:57 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-01-05 19:52 ` Shuah Khan
2021-01-06 4:29 ` David Gow
2021-01-07 16:53 ` Petr Mladek
2021-01-07 18:13 ` Shuah Khan [this message]
2020-12-27 20:00 ` Brendan Higgins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=578de82c-5119-78e4-4497-c8a8d642388d@linuxfoundation.org \
--to=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=brendanhiggins@google.com \
--cc=davidgow@google.com \
--cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox