Linux Kernel Selftest development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@redhat.com>
To: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@suse.com>,
	live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Cc: shuah@kernel.org, jpoimboe@redhat.com, mbenes@suse.cz, pmladek@suse.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] livepatch: Move tests from lib/livepatch to selftests/livepatch
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2022 09:06:16 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5966397b-5577-8075-ffdd-f32e5e4ca75a@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c5dc436e-2e3f-db2c-5cd5-215a9af19152@linuxfoundation.org>

On 6/9/22 4:16 PM, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 6/3/22 8:32 AM, Marcos Paulo de Souza wrote:
>> Hi there,
>>
>> The first patch moves the current livepatch tests to selftests,
>> allowing it
>> be better suited to contain more complex tests, like using userspace C
>> code
>> to use the livepatched kernel code. As a bonus it allows to use
>> "gen_tar" to export the livepatch selftests, rebuild the modules by
>> running make in selftests/livepatch directory and simplifies the process
>> of creating and debugging new selftests.
>>
> 
> In general selftests don't include modules. We keep test modules under lib.
> One of the reasons is that modules have dependencies on the kernel and
> should
> be built when kernel is built.
> 
> I don't fully buy the argument that moving modules under selftest would
> simplify
> the process.
> 

Hi Shuah,

I see that there is tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/ which
claims to be a "conceptually out-of-tree module".  Would similarly
moving livepatch test modules under tools/ give us flexibility to write
them build for multiple kernel versions?  Then one could theoretically
build and run the latest, greatest selftests against older kernels
(assuming the associate script/module/kernel supports the idea)?

Regards,
-- 
Joe


  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-10 13:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-03 14:32 [PATCH 0/2] livepatch: Move tests from lib/livepatch to selftests/livepatch Marcos Paulo de Souza
2022-06-03 14:32 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Marcos Paulo de Souza
2022-06-09 20:00   ` Shuah Khan
2022-06-09 20:13     ` Shuah Khan
2022-06-03 14:32 ` [PATCH 2/2] selftests: livepatch: Test livepatching a heavily called syscall Marcos Paulo de Souza
2022-06-17 21:17   ` Joe Lawrence
2022-06-09 20:16 ` [PATCH 0/2] livepatch: Move tests from lib/livepatch to selftests/livepatch Shuah Khan
2022-06-10 13:06   ` Joe Lawrence [this message]
2022-06-10 14:48     ` Petr Mladek
2022-06-14  1:02       ` Shuah Khan
2022-06-10 13:50   ` Marcos Paulo de Souza

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5966397b-5577-8075-ffdd-f32e5e4ca75a@redhat.com \
    --to=joe.lawrence@redhat.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
    --cc=mpdesouza@suse.com \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox