Linux Kernel Selftest development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: "Ridong Chen" <ridong.chen@linux.dev>,
	"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	"Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>,
	"Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>,
	cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	"Guopeng Zhang" <guopeng.zhang@linux.dev>,
	sashiko-bot@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH-next v3 00/11] cgroup/cpuset: Miscellaneous bug fixes & cleanup
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2026 08:26:59 -1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5e2e1243e837e2b73dcfe8217f521b0f@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261025214449.310715-1-longman@redhat.com>

>   cgroup/cpuset: Find furthest isolated ancestor for invalidated
>     isolated partition
>   cgroup/cpuset: Properly compute effective xcpus in
>     update_parent_effective_cpumask()
>   cgroup/cpuset: Fix incorrect effective_cpus bug in
>     update_cpumasks_hier()
>   cgroup/cpuset: Minor fixes to prstate_housekeeping_conflict()
>   selftests/cgroup: Check for a single range nohz_full CPUs before
>     running test matrix
>   cgroup/cpuset: Prevent recursive call of remote_cpus_update() via
>     update_cpumasks_hier()
>   cgroup/cpuset: Make sure compute_partition_effective_cpumask() is only
>     called for valid partition
>   cgroup/cpuset: Release invalid isolated CPUs in
>     compute_partition_effective_cpumask()
>   cgroup/cpuset: Release invalid isolated CPUs with a shrunk root
>     partition parent
>   cgroup/cpuset: Relocate compute_*effective_cpumask() and
>     compute_effective_nodemask()
>   cgroup/cpuset: Integrate compute_partition_effective_cpumask() into
>     compute_effective_cpumask()

Applied 1-11 to cgroup/for-7.4-fixes (9 as v3.1) with the Fixes tag
dropped from 5 and the following tags added:

  Reviewed-by: Guopeng Zhang <zhangguopeng@kylinos.cn> (1-4, 8, 9)
  Tested-by: Guopeng Zhang <zhangguopeng@kylinos.cn> (2, 8, 9)
  Acked-by: Guopeng Zhang <zhangguopeng@kylinos.cn> (7, 10, 11)

Thanks.

--
tejun

      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-10-26 18:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-25 21:44 [PATCH-next v3 00/11] cgroup/cpuset: Miscellaneous bug fixes & cleanup Waiman Long
2026-10-25 21:44 ` [PATCH-next v3 01/11] cgroup/cpuset: Find furthest isolated ancestor for invalidated isolated partition Waiman Long
2026-10-26  6:33   ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-25 21:44 ` [PATCH-next v3 02/11] cgroup/cpuset: Properly compute effective xcpus in update_parent_effective_cpumask() Waiman Long
2026-10-26  6:39   ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-25 21:44 ` [PATCH-next v3 03/11] cgroup/cpuset: Fix incorrect effective_cpus bug in update_cpumasks_hier() Waiman Long
2026-10-26  6:46   ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-25 21:44 ` [PATCH-next v3 04/11] cgroup/cpuset: Minor fixes to prstate_housekeeping_conflict() Waiman Long
2026-10-26  6:57   ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-25 21:44 ` [PATCH-next v3 05/11] selftests/cgroup: Check for a single range nohz_full CPUs before running test matrix Waiman Long
2026-10-25 21:44 ` [PATCH-next v3 06/11] cgroup/cpuset: Prevent recursive call of remote_cpus_update() via update_cpumasks_hier() Waiman Long
2026-10-25 21:44 ` [PATCH-next v3 07/11] cgroup/cpuset: Make sure compute_partition_effective_cpumask() is only called for valid partition Waiman Long
2026-10-26  7:14   ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-25 21:44 ` [PATCH-next v3 08/11] cgroup/cpuset: Release invalid isolated CPUs in compute_partition_effective_cpumask() Waiman Long
2026-10-26  8:49   ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-25 21:44 ` [PATCH-next v3 09/11] cgroup/cpuset: Release invalid isolated CPUs with a shrunk root partition parent Waiman Long
2026-10-25 23:53   ` [PATCH-next v3.1 " Waiman Long
2026-10-26  8:51     ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-25 23:56   ` [PATCH-next v3 " Waiman Long
2026-10-25 21:44 ` [PATCH-next v3 10/11] cgroup/cpuset: Relocate compute_*effective_cpumask() and compute_effective_nodemask() Waiman Long
2026-10-26  9:08   ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-25 21:44 ` [PATCH-next v3 11/11] cgroup/cpuset: Integrate compute_partition_effective_cpumask() into compute_effective_cpumask() Waiman Long
2026-10-26  9:44   ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-26 18:26 ` Tejun Heo [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5e2e1243e837e2b73dcfe8217f521b0f@kernel.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=guopeng.zhang@linux.dev \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
    --cc=ridong.chen@linux.dev \
    --cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox