From: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@amd.com>
To: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Cc: jgg@nvidia.com, kevin.tian@intel.com, will@kernel.org,
joro@8bytes.org, suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com,
robin.murphy@arm.com, dwmw2@infradead.org,
baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, shuah@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, eric.auger@redhat.com,
jean-philippe@linaro.org, mdf@kernel.org, mshavit@google.com,
shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com, smostafa@google.com,
yi.l.liu@intel.com, zhangfei.gao@linaro.org,
patches@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/14] iommufd: Add vIOMMU infrastructure (Part-2: vDEVICE)
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 16:58:33 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <607d019e-25b7-45b8-8c85-3829d4b53a82@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZxsvofcC9xSSEMHi@Asurada-Nvidia>
On 25/10/24 16:41, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 04:32:10PM +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>>
>>
>> On 25/10/24 15:59, Nicolin Chen wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 03:54:44PM +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>>>> On 22/10/24 11:20, Nicolin Chen wrote:
>>>>> Following the previous vIOMMU series, this adds another vDEVICE structure,
>>>>> representing the association from an iommufd_device to an iommufd_viommu.
>>>>> This gives the whole architecture a new "v" layer:
>>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>>> | iommufd (with vIOMMU/vDEVICE) |
>>>>> | _____________ _____________ |
>>>>> | | | | | |
>>>>> | |----------------| vIOMMU |<---| vDEVICE |<------| |
>>>>> | | | | |_____________| | |
>>>>> | | ______ | | _____________ ___|____ |
>>>>> | | | | | | | | | | |
>>>>> | | | IOAS |<---|(HWPT_PAGING)|<---| HWPT_NESTED |<--| DEVICE | |
>>>>> | | |______| |_____________| |_____________| |________| |
>>>>> |______|________|______________|__________________|_______________|_____|
>>>>> | | | | |
>>>>> ______v_____ | ______v_____ ______v_____ ___v__
>>>>> | struct | | PFN | (paging) | | (nested) | |struct|
>>>>> |iommu_device| |------>|iommu_domain|<----|iommu_domain|<----|device|
>>>>> |____________| storage|____________| |____________| |______|
>>>>>
>>>>> This vDEVICE object is used to collect and store all vIOMMU-related device
>>>>> information/attributes in a VM. As an initial series for vDEVICE, add only
>>>>> the virt_id to the vDEVICE, which is a vIOMMU specific device ID in a VM:
>>>>> e.g. vSID of ARM SMMUv3, vDeviceID of AMD IOMMU, and vID of Intel VT-d to
>>>>> a Context Table. This virt_id helps IOMMU drivers to link the vID to a pID
>>>>> of the device against the physical IOMMU instance. This is essential for a
>>>>> vIOMMU-based invalidation, where the request contains a device's vID for a
>>>>> device cache flush, e.g. ATC invalidation.
>>>>>
>>>>> Therefore, with this vDEVICE object, support a vIOMMU-based invalidation,
>>>>> by reusing IOMMUFD_CMD_HWPT_INVALIDATE for a vIOMMU object to flush cache
>>>>> with a given driver data.
>>>>>
>>>>> As for the implementation of the series, add driver support in ARM SMMUv3
>>>>> for a real world use case.
>>>>>
>>>>> This series is on Github:
>>>>> https://github.com/nicolinc/iommufd/commits/iommufd_viommu_p2-v4
>>>>>
>>>>> For testing, try this "with-rmr" branch:
>>>>> https://github.com/nicolinc/iommufd/commits/iommufd_viommu_p2-v4-with-rmr
>>>>
>>>> Is there any real example of a .vdevice_alloc hook, besides the
>>>> selftests? It is not in iommufd_viommu_p2-v4-with-rmr, hence the
>>>> question. I am trying to sketch something with this new machinery and
>>>> less guessing would be nice. Thanks,
>>>
>>> No, I am actually dropping that one, and moving the vdevice struct
>>> to the private header, as there seems to be no use case:
>>
>> Why keep it then?
>
> We need that structure to store per-vIOMMU virtual ID. Hiding it
> in the core only means we need to provide another vIOMMU APIs for
> drivers to look up the ID, v.s. exposing it for drivers to access
> directly.
Sorry I lost you here. If we need it, then there should be an example of
.vdevice_alloc() somewhere but you say they is not one. How do you test
this, with just selftests? :) Thanks,
>
> Thanks
> Nicolin
--
Alexey
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-25 5:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-22 0:20 [PATCH v4 00/14] iommufd: Add vIOMMU infrastructure (Part-2: vDEVICE) Nicolin Chen
2024-10-22 0:20 ` [PATCH v4 01/14] iommufd/viommu: Introduce IOMMUFD_OBJ_VDEVICE and its related struct Nicolin Chen
2024-10-25 3:37 ` Nicolin Chen
2024-10-25 7:53 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2024-10-25 13:20 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-10-25 16:39 ` Nicolin Chen
2024-10-22 0:20 ` [PATCH v4 02/14] iommufd/viommu: Add IOMMU_VDEVICE_ALLOC ioctl Nicolin Chen
2024-10-22 3:40 ` Baolu Lu
2024-10-22 4:40 ` Nicolin Chen
2024-10-22 0:20 ` [PATCH v4 03/14] iommufd/selftest: Add IOMMU_VDEVICE_ALLOC test coverage Nicolin Chen
2024-10-22 0:20 ` [PATCH v4 04/14] iommu/viommu: Add cache_invalidate to iommufd_viommu_ops Nicolin Chen
2024-10-22 0:20 ` [PATCH v4 05/14] iommufd/hw_pagetable: Enforce cache invalidation op on vIOMMU-based hwpt_nested Nicolin Chen
2024-10-22 0:20 ` [PATCH v4 06/14] iommufd: Allow hwpt_id to carry viommu_id for IOMMU_HWPT_INVALIDATE Nicolin Chen
2024-10-22 0:20 ` [PATCH v4 07/14] iommu: Add iommu_copy_struct_from_full_user_array helper Nicolin Chen
2024-10-22 0:20 ` [PATCH v4 08/14] iommufd/viommu: Add vdev_to_dev helper Nicolin Chen
2024-10-25 3:39 ` Nicolin Chen
2024-10-22 0:20 ` [PATCH v4 09/14] iommufd/selftest: Add mock_viommu_cache_invalidate Nicolin Chen
2024-10-22 0:20 ` [PATCH v4 10/14] iommufd/selftest: Add IOMMU_TEST_OP_DEV_CHECK_CACHE test command Nicolin Chen
2024-10-22 0:20 ` [PATCH v4 11/14] iommufd/selftest: Add vIOMMU coverage for IOMMU_HWPT_INVALIDATE ioctl Nicolin Chen
2024-10-22 0:20 ` [PATCH v4 12/14] Documentation: userspace-api: iommufd: Update vDEVICE Nicolin Chen
2024-10-22 0:20 ` [PATCH v4 13/14] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add arm_vsmmu_cache_invalidate Nicolin Chen
2024-10-22 0:20 ` [PATCH v4 14/14] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Allow ATS for IOMMU_DOMAIN_NESTED Nicolin Chen
2024-10-25 4:54 ` [PATCH v4 00/14] iommufd: Add vIOMMU infrastructure (Part-2: vDEVICE) Alexey Kardashevskiy
2024-10-25 4:59 ` Nicolin Chen
2024-10-25 5:32 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2024-10-25 5:41 ` Nicolin Chen
2024-10-25 5:58 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy [this message]
2024-10-25 6:14 ` Nicolin Chen
2024-10-25 13:29 ` Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=607d019e-25b7-45b8-8c85-3829d4b53a82@amd.com \
--to=aik@amd.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mdf@kernel.org \
--cc=mshavit@google.com \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=smostafa@google.com \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
--cc=zhangfei.gao@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox