From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
To: Tiago Lam <tiagolam@cloudflare.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>,
Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@fb.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>,
Tiago Lam <tiagolam@cloudflare.com>,
kernel-team@cloudflare.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] ipv4: Run a reverse sk_lookup on sendmsg.
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2024 08:45:23 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <66eacb6317540_29b986294b5@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240913-reverse-sk-lookup-v1-1-e721ea003d4c@cloudflare.com>
Tiago Lam wrote:
> In order to check if egress traffic should be allowed through, we run a
> reverse socket lookup (i.e. normal socket lookup with the src/dst
> addresses and ports reversed) to check if the corresponding ingress
> traffic is allowed in.
The subject and this description makes it sound that the change always
runs a reverse sk_lookup on sendmsg.
It also focuses on the mechanism, rather than the purpose.
The feature here adds IP_ORIGDSTADDR as a way to respond from a
user configured address. With the sk_lookup limited to this new
special case, as a safety to allow it.
If I read this correctly, I suggest rewording the cover letter and
commit to make this intent and behavior more explicit.
> Thus, if there's a sk_lookup reverse call
> returns a socket that matches the egress socket, we also let the egress
> traffic through - following the principle of, allowing return traffic to
> proceed if ingress traffic is allowed in. The reverse lookup is only
> performed in case an sk_lookup ebpf program is attached and the source
> address and/or port for the return traffic have been modified.
>
> The src address and port can be modified by using ancilliary messages.
> Up until now, it was possible to specify a different source address to
> sendmsg by providing it in an IP_PKTINFO anciliarry message, but there's
> no way to change the source port. This patch also extends the ancilliary
> messages supported by sendmsg to support the IP_ORIGDSTADDR ancilliary
> message, reusing the same cmsg and struct used in recvmsg - which
> already supports specifying a port.
>
> Suggested-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tiago Lam <tiagolam@cloudflare.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-18 12:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-13 9:39 [RFC PATCH 0/3] Allow sk_lookup UDP return traffic to egress Tiago Lam
2024-09-13 9:39 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] ipv4: Run a reverse sk_lookup on sendmsg Tiago Lam
2024-09-18 12:45 ` Willem de Bruijn [this message]
2024-09-20 16:57 ` Tiago Lam
2024-09-13 9:39 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] ipv6: " Tiago Lam
2024-09-13 18:24 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-09-17 16:15 ` Tiago Lam
2024-09-24 23:58 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-10-11 11:21 ` Tiago Lam
2024-09-14 8:59 ` Simon Horman
2024-09-17 16:06 ` Tiago Lam
2024-09-14 11:40 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-09-17 16:03 ` Tiago Lam
2024-09-13 9:39 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] bpf: Add sk_lookup test to use ORIGDSTADDR cmsg Tiago Lam
2024-09-13 12:10 ` Philo Lu
2024-09-17 16:00 ` Tiago Lam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=66eacb6317540_29b986294b5@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch \
--to=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=jakub@cloudflare.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@cloudflare.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=mykolal@fb.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=tiagolam@cloudflare.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).