From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F1B1E7849A for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2023 11:50:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236599AbjJBLuZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Oct 2023 07:50:25 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49106 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236786AbjJBLb0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Oct 2023 07:31:26 -0400 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA33CD8; Mon, 2 Oct 2023 04:31:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1696246283; x=1727782283; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id: references:mime-version; bh=aCTNRtcJs2aRsXatRFnEc0X1XOXxvpcVCPYjfzR4Hds=; b=SGfOxKMjrYXZUJCXWbRioYOHY2UcBPNkQo1uMwBJn/7mY3zZzSnUDhmb BM+RvCQGRAx5yd7+w4TZcFP+gmus8VtBqXBJPDHllK9o4hx88S9tz9rEC QA6yrsf0OGIMmFibve9L+uu4kuV+B6NuitUUfICzurf52eNn43SzMx7ll XW8JVVepxZuYgC+tu36PLiCm6cuN3zg31ELIrQO3lRWmot5mKjiPwbX+W 0tKrEvvYsH5/4JoE7YV1wHfrygTgxmkqtnweicbpgFsDUARfnOUiPl5mU 6VWi8FVorCaeSSpc1f5OzicxZspfJbVSn0Hb+NovmonH+brMj966jWvkO Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10850"; a="382529557" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.03,194,1694761200"; d="scan'208";a="382529557" Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Oct 2023 04:31:22 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10850"; a="866474806" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.03,194,1694761200"; d="scan'208";a="866474806" Received: from roliveir-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com ([10.251.222.16]) by fmsmga002-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Oct 2023 04:31:20 -0700 Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2023 14:31:18 +0300 (EEST) From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Ilpo_J=E4rvinen?= To: Shuah Khan cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Reinette Chatre , =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Maciej_Wiecz=F3r-Retman?= , Shaopeng Tan , LKML , stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] selftests/resctrl: Fixes to failing tests In-Reply-To: <20231002094813.6633-1-ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com> Message-ID: <6a826da8-a94d-261b-cfe8-c494d7237a0@linux.intel.com> References: <20231002094813.6633-1-ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="8323329-198948541-1696246282=:2459" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --8323329-198948541-1696246282=:2459 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Mon, 2 Oct 2023, Ilpo Järvinen wrote: > Fix four issues with resctrl selftests. > > The signal handling fix became necessary after the mount/umount fixes > and the uninitialized member bug was discovered during the review. > > The other two came up when I ran resctrl selftests across the server > fleet in our lab to validate the upcoming CAT test rewrite (the rewrite > is not part of this series). > > These are developed and should apply cleanly at least on top the > benchmark cleanup series (might apply cleanly also w/o the benchmark > series, I didn't test). LKP seems to no longer happy to apply this cleanly without the benchmark rework series as the signal handling fix got now a bigger footprint (maybe LKP didn't build v3 at all as the changes from v3->v4 were really small and I did not get error out of v3). Shuah, would you want me to reorganize this such that it goes in before the benchmark series? In any case, I'll wait until Reinette has had time to look at the first patch if I'm to send the series reordered. -- i. --8323329-198948541-1696246282=:2459--