From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B053EC4332F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2022 20:52:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232582AbiKGUw5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Nov 2022 15:52:57 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42798 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232191AbiKGUw4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Nov 2022 15:52:56 -0500 Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8FF727176; Mon, 7 Nov 2022 12:52:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1667854375; x=1699390375; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KHZYJ5N4WN4GFIdBJV+9/tjtDA1oPGVdqK3Z+qwe07A=; b=Oc4iLPbTPMczUwq7su4EZeOzYvn7LuUMbqbYNqEXUcgvB4MtvkFwdXwW qEnvnxPAnDC1MJdQfKAYy3pd0oehrgS8oGaLNA+OqsGmX1cD2alChzFWV 215PZQEPr/YEPL591QgUcgP0OU4uoi1aIn0otS0l6x8yT41L8sdeEMbnX pd25pTFaMcjDJGTEsayNwIa9Zgz0HM7b+KzPxYvT1ycWQKJFutEgMqGi4 BMsphX036TjjhFhf2w/9ZvlXqHXQrOSAoaIz2zhCFKv2f/7D/klK+o9yb Xwc8u1NP08ha4yaPADeMX9fCzXxJJ376BiZYmZpjz6DEMnvtqrmhM51fk Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10524"; a="310524040" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.96,145,1665471600"; d="scan'208";a="310524040" Received: from fmsmga008.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.58]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Nov 2022 12:52:55 -0800 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10524"; a="699636618" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.96,145,1665471600"; d="scan'208";a="699636618" Received: from peggykes-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.251.7.244]) ([10.251.7.244]) by fmsmga008-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Nov 2022 12:52:54 -0800 Message-ID: <6d29eadd-69ef-343d-fcc8-b0432d604e92@intel.com> Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2022 12:52:52 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.2.2 Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v6] x86/fpu: Trying to fix writing PKRU through ptrace Content-Language: en-US To: Slade Watkins , Kyle Huey Cc: Linus Torvalds , Dave Hansen , Thomas Gleixner , Borislav Petkov , Ingo Molnar , x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Paolo Bonzini , Andy Lutomirski , Peter Zijlstra , Sean Christopherson , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Robert O'Callahan , David Manouchehri References: <20221107063807.81774-1-khuey@kylehuey.com> From: Dave Hansen In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org On 11/7/22 12:49, Slade Watkins wrote: > On Mon, Nov 7, 2022 at 1:38 AM Kyle Huey wrote: >> I've been trying since July to get this regression that was introduced in >> 5.14 fixed. This is my third time submitting this version of the patch in the >> last two months. Both prior submissions have not received any comments from >> (nor have they been applied by) the x86 maintainers. I don't really know >> what else to do at this point beyond "complain to the management" as it >> were. >> >> I appreciate anything you can do to unjam things here. > Maintainers: is there any reason why this hasn't been applied, or > received comments? I'm confused and a bit worried. Thomas had some strong opinions in the area, so I've been neglecting it. I'll put it in my queue to take a look now, though.