From: Joseph Jang <jjang@nvidia.com>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Cc: shuah@kernel.org, avagin@google.com, amir73il@gmail.com,
brauner@kernel.org, mochs@nvidia.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, sdonthineni@nvidia.com,
treding@nvidia.com, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] selftest: rtc: Add support rtc alarm content check
Date: Fri, 3 May 2024 18:47:56 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6ea936b8-b036-467b-8186-f461b7eea5e1@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202405030649157e9de2ac@mail.local>
On 2024/5/3 2:49 PM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> On 02/05/2024 18:41:02-0700, Joseph Jang wrote:
>> Some platforms do not support WAKEUP service by default, we use a shell
>> script to check the absence of alarm content in /proc/driver/rtc.
>
> procfs for the RTC has been deprecated for a while, don't use it.
>
> Instead, you can use the RTC_PARAM_GET ioctl to get RTC_PARAM_FEATURES
> and then look at RTC_FEATURE_ALARM.
> See https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/abelloni/rtc-tools.git/tree/rtc.c
>
I found old version kernel doesn't support RTC_PARAM_GET ioctl. In order
support old version kernel testing, is it possible to use rtc procfs to
validate wakealarm function for old version kernel ?
Can I move this rtc alarm validation to
<linux_root>/tools/testing/selftests/rtc/rtctest.c ? So we could try to
use RTC_PARAM_GET ioctl
first and then roll back to use rtc procfs if RTC_PARAM_GET ioctl was
not supported.
Thank you,
Joseph.
>>
>> The script will validate /proc/driver/rtc when it is not empty and then
>> check if could find alarm content in it according to the rtc wakealarm
>> is supported or not.
>>
>> Requires commit 101ca8d05913b ("rtc: efi: Enable SET/GET WAKEUP services
>> as optional")
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Matthew R. Ochs <mochs@nvidia.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Joseph Jang <jjang@nvidia.com>
>> ---
>> tools/testing/selftests/Makefile | 1 +
>> tools/testing/selftests/rtc/property/Makefile | 5 ++++
>> .../selftests/rtc/property/rtc-alarm-test.sh | 27 +++++++++++++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 33 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/rtc/property/Makefile
>> create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/rtc/property/rtc-alarm-test.sh
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/Makefile
>> index e1504833654d..f5d43e2132e8 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/Makefile
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/Makefile
>> @@ -80,6 +80,7 @@ TARGETS += riscv
>> TARGETS += rlimits
>> TARGETS += rseq
>> TARGETS += rtc
>> +TARGETS += rtc/property
>> TARGETS += rust
>> TARGETS += seccomp
>> TARGETS += sgx
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/rtc/property/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/rtc/property/Makefile
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..c6f7aa4f0e29
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/rtc/property/Makefile
>> @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +TEST_PROGS := rtc-alarm-test.sh
>> +
>> +include ../../lib.mk
>> +
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/rtc/property/rtc-alarm-test.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/rtc/property/rtc-alarm-test.sh
>> new file mode 100755
>> index 000000000000..3bee1dd5fbd0
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/rtc/property/rtc-alarm-test.sh
>> @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
>> +#!/bin/bash
>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +
>> +if [ ! -f /proc/driver/rtc ]; then
>> + echo "SKIP: the /proc/driver/rtc is empty."
>> + exit 4
>> +fi
>> +
>> +# Check if could find alarm content in /proc/driver/rtc according to
>> +# the rtc wakealarm is supported or not.
>> +if [ -n "$(ls /sys/class/rtc/rtc* | grep -i wakealarm)" ]; then
>> + if [ -n "$(grep -i alarm /proc/driver/rtc)" ]; then
>> + exit 0
>> + else
>> + echo "ERROR: The alarm content is not found."
>> + cat /proc/driver/rtc
>> + exit 1
>> + fi
>> +else
>> + if [ -n "$(grep -i alarm /proc/driver/rtc)" ]; then
>> + echo "ERROR: The alarm content is found."
>> + cat /proc/driver/rtc
>> + exit 1
>> + else
>> + exit 0
>> + fi
>> +fi
>> --
>> 2.34.1
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-03 10:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-03 1:41 [PATCH 0/1] selftest: rtc: Add support rtc alarm content check Joseph Jang
2024-05-03 1:41 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Joseph Jang
2024-05-03 6:49 ` Alexandre Belloni
2024-05-03 10:47 ` Joseph Jang [this message]
2024-05-03 11:21 ` Joseph Jang
[not found] ` <IA0PR12MB83745321F32B6FA0DE041D10C01F2@IA0PR12MB8374.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
2024-05-03 12:23 ` Joseph Jang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6ea936b8-b036-467b-8186-f461b7eea5e1@nvidia.com \
--to=jjang@nvidia.com \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=avagin@google.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mochs@nvidia.com \
--cc=sdonthineni@nvidia.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=treding@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox