From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 411533E2ACC; Sun, 13 Sep 2026 10:24:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789295070; cv=none; b=uDM/fv7CpfJ25hkluj7dTUBt4KzrTUKKuF1H5OGy4AZlzHWLtXyxQcZhlO8xLjTe4m6M01/fwdsuGHpxcLk2Iyzv5RxqffNCduyLJNO9oXp1+issyQawB0eGUXrgB8WZfwzjkNwsYtncVt4CQRJNQSW1+ykqXGqrMZERSy7Zcug= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789295070; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Ppyco9I84ddMlU1O9ZYk2ofbAJAiLguvAB2+4QTqXjE=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:From:To:Cc:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=kgyglerhvy64kXj3ExxPC6AxC3Yv6OJhSV8MXN5C38r8H7dLln6rf/JnoQjMWNF8PSYgThOicGymdJO4lbq9OLbbWNfkE5x8/F+rL6JC1EmkzfGULzQRyYuFr3lO9SRKO1jfGIEPjHFtHV1FTto0lJ2oaveUNH9g1F4YtFxkdnU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=arm.com header.i=@arm.com header.b=qrdk26jQ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=arm.com header.i=@arm.com header.b="qrdk26jQ" Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64F9F1655; Sun, 13 Sep 2026 03:24:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.57.81.151] (unknown [10.57.81.151]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6B3A43F7B4; Sun, 13 Sep 2026 03:24:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=arm.com; s=foss; t=1789295059; bh=Ppyco9I84ddMlU1O9ZYk2ofbAJAiLguvAB2+4QTqXjE=; h=Date:Subject:From:To:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=qrdk26jQPzo3hTOw4vj2lavydgi6kLds3Mc6wUWXNkYP0OLLkerE6TqRvtuVkPkrn x88a+mwXm6HJ4/7B/c6GQdrc1qSSrQe/cBEcZ7Xp3U3jDY8oHz31lImuA8hWnlQ+lb uXK0fyoWHc7AA6+QlbuBAHh50KvhlJ3o1+iedjQA= Message-ID: <777919b3-5935-4f1d-b642-e1e56f5a82f8@arm.com> Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2026 11:24:13 +0100 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] selftests: Skip SUD tests when unsupported From: Christian Loehle To: Shuah Khan , linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Cc: Rama Krishna Katta , Thomas Gleixner , Gregory Price , Kees Cook , Peter Zijlstra , Andy Lutomirski , Gabriel Krisman Bertazi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <499c6893-5daf-421d-ae11-31d0d9332241@arm.com> Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <499c6893-5daf-421d-ae11-31d0d9332241@arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 8/26/26 15:56, Christian Loehle wrote: > On 8/17/26 12:16, Christian Loehle wrote: >> Syscall User Dispatch (SUD) is unavailable on architectures without >> generic syscall entry. Such architectures return -EINVAL for otherwise >> valid SUD prctl and ptrace requests, which the SUD selftests currently >> report as failures. >> >> Probe SUD with a valid disabled configuration and skip the affected tests >> when that probe returns EINVAL. Unexpected errors remain failures, and the >> existing coverage is unchanged on kernels that support SUD. >> >> Christian Loehle (3): >> selftests/ptrace: Skip get_set_sud if SUD is unsupported >> selftests/syscall_user_dispatch: Skip tests if SUD is unsupported >> selftests/syscall_user_dispatch: Skip benchmark if SUD is unsupported >> >> tools/testing/selftests/ptrace/get_set_sud.c | 8 +++++ >> .../syscall_user_dispatch/sud_benchmark.c | 9 +++++ >> .../syscall_user_dispatch/sud_test.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++ >> 3 files changed, 53 insertions(+) >> >> >> base-commit: 8d3ae59288f1e7d58d76558a6ee96d533bc5019f > > Gentle ping on this Another gentle ping, this should have all the reviews to land, right?