From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D3C1C19F2A for ; Thu, 4 Aug 2022 16:58:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230177AbiHDQ6E (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Aug 2022 12:58:04 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59928 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236308AbiHDQ6C (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Aug 2022 12:58:02 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x431.google.com (mail-pf1-x431.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::431]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7508167CB8; Thu, 4 Aug 2022 09:58:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x431.google.com with SMTP id u133so26065pfc.10; Thu, 04 Aug 2022 09:58:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc; bh=kcSGs+fZuWMXLT8zv9vm9AaTYUZcm+hY8x4vuZxcqO4=; b=KGtRlv4dcnACfh2AWJWv+FJR7v3O72dX7m83WhrgoTl3oSgJBk/pmKKaW3j0dcdfbd f5YMdxxVKOh1Ndf7yjXllO/4i72QPQjiXSxCcOzJTieTj33LipenWCHkX804ZQVeP7oo 7uySwlS5+DENHUJ8D7ii+D8tG2h/dW7JIvc9hao4fqPhZPLUmDlk7tpdZe1R88Can+/C IRoqVDCG99gC8yt2pxX9JyENJns/9HcolNbk+5VSh/TUKlgXoo6oLfytCoPQw1+F2hTb y97x/CAmiEK6WZG4b9CMmc1UmmhRCnuD5JGeE6Xdzn7SvcqQHasazmZRQmD26RfhUuZQ vzRg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=kcSGs+fZuWMXLT8zv9vm9AaTYUZcm+hY8x4vuZxcqO4=; b=Q+udMhLhjLOalGtUGEosPV6nEIDyeyFAcZ++poR3rX/EDTpOVgfmezbHw0Xo3/SDlI Shg5E31A5zLCTNiaRT7g0bxLJXXAyXgAbql3Fb+kG4cX/n1yssbpm9GPbeapeehdQpXY P20flEcXixw0SmdEAEqrS9n6m1VHuKGf8Jpx7LHQkltoE9Azd0uuJ1D3oYhXD65qrzE5 ichdF4WDpxYyGKFDEiML9U7tcfBPx9fGYFNouViSKGRlbr7Z671rUE/1atz3p5jogBGY Sn3zX5qvP6jetrc138AJjsBrIAd/ttqda65uhDR7Q8vXBKtJg+1gDLiH9gk8XDSZaSY8 I4Xw== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo3nCFoJMxP5L2aeskLWWZfgaHh+zKoi1vxM0mLYzafnRrUYz2rE Ia+eWkTFDPYxRee1CRvQvok= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR4Aogd2F75JVozSzkz3uRZ/PBrMX9MpACR5b1bkQvz18Y8JaiotVwjnYzL+BeNVLlvnlB6Sdw== X-Received: by 2002:a63:5f09:0:b0:41c:da4f:e498 with SMTP id t9-20020a635f09000000b0041cda4fe498mr2378174pgb.276.1659632280734; Thu, 04 Aug 2022 09:58:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2620:10d:c083:3603:1885:b229:3257:6535? ([2620:10d:c090:500::1:a8ba]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a1-20020a170902ecc100b0016cf714d029sm1154466plh.288.2022.08.04.09.57.59 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 04 Aug 2022 09:58:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <7c42bf11-8a30-3220-9d52-34b46b68888f@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2022 09:57:58 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.1.0 Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 1/6] net: Documentation on QUIC kernel Tx crypto. Content-Language: en-US To: Andrew Lunn Cc: kuba@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, corbet@lwn.net, dsahern@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org, imagedong@tencent.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org References: <20220803164045.3585187-1-adel.abushaev@gmail.com> <20220803164045.3585187-2-adel.abushaev@gmail.com> <4a757ba1-7b8e-6012-458e-217056eaee63@gmail.com> From: Adel Abouchaev In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Looking at https://github.com/shemminger/iproute2/blob/main/misc/ss.c#L589 the ss.c still uses proc/. Adel. On 8/4/22 8:29 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote: > On Wed, Aug 03, 2022 at 11:51:59AM -0700, Adel Abouchaev wrote: >> Andrew, >> >>    Could you add more to your comment? The /proc was used similarly to kTLS. >> Netlink is better, though, unsure how ULP stats would fit in it. > How do tools like ss(1) retrieve the protocol summary statistics? Do > they still use /proc, or netlink? > > Andrew