From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
To: Geliang Tang <geliang@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@fb.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 6/7] selftests/bpf: Use connect_to_fd_opts in do_test in bpf_tcp_ca
Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 22:21:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7e9c544a-fd2a-4c19-b06b-d72b5e7fc543@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bd55a421ab8e8b8bce4658840bc028d9aa6965c5.1716638248.git.tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
On 5/25/24 5:08 AM, Geliang Tang wrote:
> From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
>
> This patch uses connect_to_fd_opts() instead of using connect_fd_to_fd()
> and settcpca() in do_test() in prog_tests/bpf_tcp_ca.c to accept a struct
> network_helper_opts argument.
>
> Then define a dctcp dedicated post_socket_cb callback stg_post_socket_cb(),
> invoking both cc_cb() and bpf_map_update_elem() in it, and set it in
> test_dctcp(). For passing map_fd into stg_post_socket_cb() callback, a new
> member map_fd is added in struct cb_opts.
>
> Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
> ---
> .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_tcp_ca.c | 42 ++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_tcp_ca.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_tcp_ca.c
> index ebc7d4616880..9a7c3dc39008 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_tcp_ca.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_tcp_ca.c
> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ static int expected_stg = 0xeB9F;
>
> struct cb_opts {
> const char *cc;
> + int map_fd;
> };
>
> static int settcpca(int fd, const char *tcp_ca)
> @@ -41,7 +42,6 @@ static int settcpca(int fd, const char *tcp_ca)
> static void do_test(const struct network_helper_opts *opts,
> const struct bpf_map *sk_stg_map)
> {
> - struct cb_opts *cb_opts = (struct cb_opts *)opts->cb_opts;
> int lfd = -1, fd = -1;
> int err;
>
> @@ -49,25 +49,9 @@ static void do_test(const struct network_helper_opts *opts,
> if (!ASSERT_NEQ(lfd, -1, "socket"))
> return;
>
> - fd = socket(AF_INET6, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
> - if (!ASSERT_NEQ(fd, -1, "socket")) {
> - close(lfd);
> - return;
> - }
> -
> - if (settcpca(fd, cb_opts->cc))
> - goto done;
> -
> - if (sk_stg_map) {
> - err = bpf_map_update_elem(bpf_map__fd(sk_stg_map), &fd,
> - &expected_stg, BPF_NOEXIST);
> - if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_map_update_elem(sk_stg_map)"))
> - goto done;
> - }
> -
> /* connect to server */
> - err = connect_fd_to_fd(fd, lfd, 0);
> - if (!ASSERT_NEQ(err, -1, "connect"))
> + fd = connect_to_fd_opts(lfd, opts);
> + if (!ASSERT_NEQ(fd, -1, "connect_to_fd_opts"))
> goto done;
>
> if (sk_stg_map) {
> @@ -124,13 +108,30 @@ static void test_cubic(void)
> bpf_cubic__destroy(cubic_skel);
> }
>
> +static int stg_post_socket_cb(int fd, void *opts)
> +{
> + struct cb_opts *cb_opts = (struct cb_opts *)opts;
> + int err;
> +
> + err = settcpca(fd, cb_opts->cc);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + err = bpf_map_update_elem(cb_opts->map_fd, &fd,
> + &expected_stg, BPF_NOEXIST);
Looking at it again, it is not very correct. At least this map update is
unnecessary for the start_server_str() in do_test(). do_test() uses the same
opts for start_server_str() and connect_to_fd_opts().
Also, the post_connect_cb in patch 8 is unnecessary for network_helpers.c. The
connect_to_fd_opts helper is going to return the fd anyway. It is unnecessary to
have the helper to do the post_connect_cb(fd). The caller (do_test here) can
directly do that instead. Lets not add unnecessary post_connect_cb to the
network_helpers.c now until there is a clear case that the caller cannot do it.
I would just add another "const struct network_helper_opts *cli_opts" to the
do_test() to do what patch 7 and patch 8 need to do. Separate it from the server
"opts".
Patach 1 to 5 is applied. Thanks.
> + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_map_update_elem(sk_stg_map)"))
> + return err;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static void test_dctcp(void)
> {
> struct cb_opts cb_opts = {
> .cc = "bpf_dctcp",
> };
> struct network_helper_opts opts = {
> - .post_socket_cb = cc_cb,
> + .post_socket_cb = stg_post_socket_cb,
> .cb_opts = &cb_opts,
> };
> struct bpf_dctcp *dctcp_skel;
> @@ -146,6 +147,7 @@ static void test_dctcp(void)
> return;
> }
>
> + cb_opts.map_fd = bpf_map__fd(dctcp_skel->maps.sk_stg_map);
> do_test(&opts, dctcp_skel->maps.sk_stg_map);
> ASSERT_EQ(dctcp_skel->bss->stg_result, expected_stg, "stg_result");
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-29 5:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-25 12:08 [PATCH bpf-next v5 0/7] use network helpers, part 5 Geliang Tang
2024-05-25 12:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 1/7] selftests/bpf: Drop struct post_socket_opts Geliang Tang
2024-05-25 12:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 2/7] selftests/bpf: Add start_server_str helper Geliang Tang
2024-05-25 12:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 3/7] selftests/bpf: Use post_socket_cb in connect_to_fd_opts Geliang Tang
2024-05-25 12:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 4/7] selftests/bpf: Use post_socket_cb in start_server_str Geliang Tang
2024-05-25 12:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 5/7] selftests/bpf: Use start_server_str in do_test in bpf_tcp_ca Geliang Tang
2024-05-25 12:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 6/7] selftests/bpf: Use connect_to_fd_opts " Geliang Tang
2024-05-29 5:21 ` Martin KaFai Lau [this message]
2024-05-25 12:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 7/7] selftests/bpf: Add post_connect_cb callback Geliang Tang
2024-05-29 5:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 0/7] use network helpers, part 5 patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7e9c544a-fd2a-4c19-b06b-d72b5e7fc543@linux.dev \
--to=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=geliang@kernel.org \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mykolal@fb.com \
--cc=sdf@google.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=tanggeliang@kylinos.cn \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox