From: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com>
To: srinivas pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com>,
kernel@collabora.com, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] selftests/thermel/intel: conform the test to TAP output
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2024 11:19:03 +0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <81fe07bb-8980-4fca-950a-7945b6f8563a@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7142312c6a9e2aa96134031be435448c56d1897e.camel@linux.intel.com>
On 7/3/24 9:40 AM, srinivas pandruvada wrote:
> On Tue, 2024-07-02 at 15:12 +0500, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
>> Conform the layout, informational and status messages to TAP. No
>> functional change is intended other than the layout of output
>> messages.
>>
> Not true. You did functional change by adding a break in the loop.
> The purpose here to wait for these message continuously till ctrl-c or
> similar.
I'll correct the description.
>
>> The test has infinite loop to read the value of status_str. Break the
>> loop after getting the value once and finish the test.
>>
> No, that is not the purpose.
We want to finish the test after some iterations as in CIs we cannot abort
the test by sending signals. Would 10 or 100 iterations be enough for this
test? Or it is the kind of test which wouldn't get events until some other
process is using the same driver files?
>
>> Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com>
>> ---
>> Changes since v1:
>> - Use ksft_exit_fail_perror if read() returns error
>> - Break the infinite loop after printing status_str
>> ---
>> .../intel/power_floor/power_floor_test.c | 70 ++++++++---------
>> --
>> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git
>> a/tools/testing/selftests/thermal/intel/power_floor/power_floor_test.
>> c
>> b/tools/testing/selftests/thermal/intel/power_floor/power_floor_test.
>> c
>> index 0326b39a11b91..c06b275acd36b 100644
>> ---
>> a/tools/testing/selftests/thermal/intel/power_floor/power_floor_test.
>> c
>> +++
>> b/tools/testing/selftests/thermal/intel/power_floor/power_floor_test.
>> c
>> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
>> #include <fcntl.h>
>> #include <poll.h>
>> #include <signal.h>
>> +#include "../../../kselftest.h"
>>
>> #define POWER_FLOOR_ENABLE_ATTRIBUTE
>> "/sys/bus/pci/devices/0000:00:04.0/power_limits/power_floor_enable"
>> #define POWER_FLOOR_STATUS_ATTRIBUTE
>> "/sys/bus/pci/devices/0000:00:04.0/power_limits/power_floor_status"
>> @@ -20,17 +21,13 @@ void power_floor_exit(int signum)
>> /* Disable feature via sysfs knob */
>>
>> fd = open(POWER_FLOOR_ENABLE_ATTRIBUTE, O_RDWR);
>> - if (fd < 0) {
>> - perror("Unable to open power floor enable file\n");
>> - exit(1);
>> - }
>> + if (fd < 0)
>> + ksft_exit_fail_perror("Unable to open power floor
>> enable file");
>>
>> - if (write(fd, "0\n", 2) < 0) {
>> - perror("Can' disable power floor notifications\n");
>> - exit(1);
>> - }
>> + if (write(fd, "0\n", 2) < 0)
>> + ksft_exit_fail_perror("Can' disable power floor
>> notifications");
>>
>> - printf("Disabled power floor notifications\n");
>> + ksft_print_msg("Disabled power floor notifications\n");
>>
>> close(fd);
>> }
>> @@ -41,6 +38,9 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>> char status_str[3];
>> int fd, ret;
>>
>> + ksft_print_header();
>> + ksft_set_plan(1);
>> +
>> if (signal(SIGINT, power_floor_exit) == SIG_IGN)
>> signal(SIGINT, SIG_IGN);
>> if (signal(SIGHUP, power_floor_exit) == SIG_IGN)
>> @@ -50,59 +50,49 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>>
>> /* Enable feature via sysfs knob */
>> fd = open(POWER_FLOOR_ENABLE_ATTRIBUTE, O_RDWR);
>> - if (fd < 0) {
>> - perror("Unable to open power floor enable file\n");
>> - exit(1);
>> - }
>> + if (fd < 0)
>> + ksft_exit_fail_perror("Unable to open power floor
>> enable file");
>>
>> - if (write(fd, "1\n", 2) < 0) {
>> - perror("Can' enable power floor notifications\n");
>> - exit(1);
>> - }
>> + if (write(fd, "1\n", 2) < 0)
>> + ksft_exit_fail_perror("Can' enable power floor
>> notifications");
>>
>> close(fd);
>>
>> - printf("Enabled power floor notifications\n");
>> + ksft_print_msg("Enabled power floor notifications\n");
>>
>> while (1) {
>> fd = open(POWER_FLOOR_STATUS_ATTRIBUTE, O_RDONLY);
>> - if (fd < 0) {
>> - perror("Unable to power floor status
>> file\n");
>> - exit(1);
>> - }
>> + if (fd < 0)
>> + ksft_exit_fail_perror("Unable to power floor
>> status file");
>>
>> - if ((lseek(fd, 0L, SEEK_SET)) < 0) {
>> - fprintf(stderr, "Failed to set pointer to
>> beginning\n");
>> - exit(1);
>> - }
>> + if ((lseek(fd, 0L, SEEK_SET)) < 0)
>> + ksft_exit_fail_perror("Failed to set pointer
>> to beginning\n");
>>
>> - if (read(fd, status_str, sizeof(status_str)) < 0) {
>> - fprintf(stderr, "Failed to read from:%s\n",
>> - POWER_FLOOR_STATUS_ATTRIBUTE);
>> - exit(1);
>> - }
>> + if (read(fd, status_str, sizeof(status_str)) < 0)
>> + ksft_exit_fail_perror("Failed to read from:
>> power_floor_status");
>>
>> ufd.fd = fd;
>> ufd.events = POLLPRI;
>>
>> ret = poll(&ufd, 1, -1);
>> if (ret < 0) {
>> - perror("poll error");
>> - exit(1);
>> + ksft_exit_fail_msg("Poll error\n");
>> } else if (ret == 0) {
>> - printf("Poll Timeout\n");
>> + ksft_print_msg("Poll Timeout\n");
>> } else {
>> - if ((lseek(fd, 0L, SEEK_SET)) < 0) {
>> - fprintf(stderr, "Failed to set
>> pointer to beginning\n");
>> - exit(1);
>> - }
>> + if ((lseek(fd, 0L, SEEK_SET)) < 0)
>> + ksft_exit_fail_msg("Failed to set
>> pointer to beginning\n");
>>
>> if (read(fd, status_str, sizeof(status_str))
>> < 0)
>> - exit(0);
>> + ksft_exit_fail_perror("Failed to
>> read");
>>
>> - printf("power floor status: %s\n",
>> status_str);
>> + ksft_print_msg("power floor status: %s\n",
>> status_str);
>> + break;
>> }
>>
>> close(fd);
>> }
>> +
>> + ksft_test_result_pass("Successfully read\n");
>> + ksft_finished();
>> }
>
>
--
BR,
Muhammad Usama Anjum
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-03 6:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-02 10:12 [PATCH v2 1/2] selftests/thermel/intel: conform the test to TAP output Muhammad Usama Anjum
2024-07-02 10:12 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] " Muhammad Usama Anjum
2024-07-03 4:40 ` srinivas pandruvada
2024-07-03 6:19 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum [this message]
2024-07-03 6:49 ` srinivas pandruvada
2024-07-09 23:39 ` Shuah Khan
2024-07-03 4:34 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] " srinivas pandruvada
2024-07-09 23:38 ` Shuah Khan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=81fe07bb-8980-4fca-950a-7945b6f8563a@collabora.com \
--to=usama.anjum@collabora.com \
--cc=kernel@collabora.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox