From: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Anjali Kulkarni <anjali.k.kulkarni@oracle.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Liam Howlett <liam.howlett@oracle.com>,
"kuba@kernel.org" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH next 3/3] selftests:connector: Add root check and fix arg error paths to skip
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2023 16:25:55 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <84048d13-9311-36f6-9eb4-8169952580d7@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3242346A-9B09-44F7-A062-8456F83372C7@oracle.com>
On 7/28/23 15:59, Anjali Kulkarni wrote:
>
>
>> On Jul 28, 2023, at 2:41 PM, Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 7/28/23 15:21, Anjali Kulkarni wrote:
>>>> On Jul 28, 2023, at 12:44 PM, Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 7/28/23 13:06, Shuah Khan wrote:
>>>>> On 7/28/23 12:10, Anjali Kulkarni wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Jul 28, 2023, at 10:29 AM, Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> proc_filter test requires root privileges. Add root privilege check
>>>>>>> and skip the test. Also fix argument parsing paths to skip in their
>>>>>>> error legs.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> tools/testing/selftests/connector/proc_filter.c | 9 +++++++--
>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/connector/proc_filter.c b/tools/testing/selftests/connector/proc_filter.c
>>>>>>> index 4fe8c6763fd8..7b2081b98e5c 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/connector/proc_filter.c
>>>>>>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/connector/proc_filter.c
>>>>>>> @@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> if (argc > 2) {
>>>>>>> printf("Expected 0(assume no-filter) or 1 argument(-f)\n");
>>>>>>> - exit(1);
>>>>>>> + exit(KSFT_SKIP);
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> if (argc == 2) {
>>>>>>> @@ -256,10 +256,15 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>>>>>>> filter = 1;
>>>>>>> } else {
>>>>>>> printf("Valid option : -f (for filter feature)\n");
>>>>>>> - exit(1);
>>>>>>> + exit(KSFT_SKIP);
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> + if (geteuid()) {
>>>>>>> + printf("Connector test requires root privileges.\n");
>>>>>>> + exit(KSFT_SKIP);
>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am not sure why you have added this check? proc_filter does not need root privilege to run.
>>>>>>
>>>>> It failed for me when I ran it saying it requires root privileges.
>>>>> I had to run it as root.
>>>>
>>>> The following is what I see when I run the test as non-root
>>>> user:
>>>>
>>>> bind failed: Operation not permitted
>>>>
>>> Yes, that’s expected on a kernel which does not have the kernel patches submitted with this selftest installed on it.
>>> So this check for root needs to be removed.
>>
>> I will send v2 for this patch without root check. I should have
>> split the argument error paths and root check anyway.
>>
>> However, what is strange is if the test run by root, bind() doesn't fail.
>> This doesn't make sense to me based on what you said about bind() fails
>> if kernel doesn't support the new feature.
>>
>
> I didn’t say that - part of the changes introduced by the patches is to remove the root check and add some features on top of existing code.
>
Okay. So what should happen if a root user runs this test on a kernel
that doesn't have the kernel patches submitted with this selftest
installed on it?
thanks,
-- Shuah
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-28 22:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-28 17:29 [PATCH next 0/3] Connector/proc_filter test fixes Shuah Khan
2023-07-28 17:29 ` [PATCH next 1/3] selftests:connector: Fix Makefile to include KHDR_INCLUDES Shuah Khan
2023-07-31 21:55 ` Anjali Kulkarni
2023-07-28 17:29 ` [PATCH next 2/3] selftests:connector: Add .gitignore and poupulate it with test Shuah Khan
2023-07-31 21:55 ` Anjali Kulkarni
2023-07-28 17:29 ` [PATCH next 3/3] selftests:connector: Add root check and fix arg error paths to skip Shuah Khan
2023-07-28 18:10 ` Anjali Kulkarni
2023-07-28 19:06 ` Shuah Khan
2023-07-28 19:44 ` Shuah Khan
2023-07-28 21:21 ` Anjali Kulkarni
2023-07-28 21:41 ` Shuah Khan
2023-07-28 21:59 ` Anjali Kulkarni
2023-07-28 22:25 ` Shuah Khan [this message]
2023-07-28 22:40 ` Anjali Kulkarni
2023-07-28 23:00 ` Shuah Khan
2023-07-29 0:19 ` Anjali Kulkarni
2023-07-29 0:32 ` Shuah Khan
2023-07-29 0:58 ` Anjali Kulkarni
2023-07-29 1:02 ` Anjali Kulkarni
2023-07-31 21:50 ` [PATCH next 0/3] Connector/proc_filter test fixes patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=84048d13-9311-36f6-9eb4-8169952580d7@linuxfoundation.org \
--to=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=anjali.k.kulkarni@oracle.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=liam.howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox