From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
To: "Nylon Chen" <nylon.chen@sifive.com>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Darren Hart" <dvhart@infradead.org>,
"Davidlohr Bueso" <dave@stgolabs.net>,
"André Almeida" <andrealmeid@igalia.com>,
"Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Zong Li <zong.li@sifive.com>, Nylon Chen <nylon.chen@sifive.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/futex: skip futex_numa_mpol without libnuma
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2026 22:35:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877bst33zr.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260128-b4-futex-test-v1-1-ce73742068ad@sifive.com>
On Wed, Jan 28 2026 at 22:32, Nylon Chen wrote:
> Use pkg-config --exists numa to derive HAVE_LIBNUMA.
> Only keep futex_numa_mpol in TEST_GEN_PROGS when libnuma is present.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zong Li <zong.li@sifive.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nylon Chen <nylon.chen@sifive.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/Makefile | 9 ++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/Makefile
> index af7ec309ea78..ec3c39a51182 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/Makefile
> @@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> PKG_CONFIG ?= pkg-config
> +HAVE_LIBNUMA := $(shell sh -c "$(PKG_CONFIG) --exists numa > /dev/null 2>&1 && echo y")
> LIBNUMA_TEST = $(shell sh -c "$(PKG_CONFIG) numa --atleast-version 2.0.16 > /dev/null 2>&1 && echo SUFFICIENT || echo NO")
Why another test? LIBNUMA_TEST fails when it does not exist or when the
version number is not enough.
> INCLUDES := -I../include -I../../ $(KHDR_INCLUDES)
> CFLAGS := $(CFLAGS) -g -O2 -Wall -pthread -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_TIME_BITS=64 $(INCLUDES) $(KHDR_INCLUDES) -DLIBNUMA_VER_$(LIBNUMA_TEST)=1
> -LDLIBS := -lpthread -lrt -lnuma
>
> LOCAL_HDRS := \
> ../include/futextest.h \
> @@ -27,6 +27,13 @@ TEST_GEN_PROGS := \
>
> TEST_PROGS := run.sh
>
> +ifeq ($(HAVE_LIBNUMA),y)
> +LDLIBS := -lpthread -lrt -lnuma
> +else
> +LDLIBS := -lpthread -lrt
> +TEST_GEN_PROGS := $(filter-out futex_numa_mpol,$(TEST_GEN_PROGS))
Why? The test contains more than just the libnuma dependend stuff. There
are two issues here:
One is -lnuma, which is trivial to solve:
LDLIBS := -lpthread -lrt
ifeq ($(LIBNUMA_TEST),SUFFICIENT)
LDLIBS += -lnuma
endif
The other is the include <numa*.h> in the source. I assume you can
figure out how to prevent those headers from being included, right?
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-03 21:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-29 6:32 [PATCH] selftests/futex: skip futex_numa_mpol without libnuma Nylon Chen
2026-02-03 21:35 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2026-02-09 2:33 ` Nylon Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877bst33zr.ffs@tglx \
--to=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=andrealmeid@igalia.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nylon.chen@sifive.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=zong.li@sifive.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox