From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E94842087C; Tue, 7 Jul 2026 23:31:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783467109; cv=none; b=CLC+X2KZeErr1o7FNU0a75eQhjZxVmEjalzRJd6FLVwsARLpPYsm7sd4snf3W+1MbT7shPBpqiXIzja5CLr+qhY/SF6jbouOckNo5vY2pYhDUakd2ZD01InmLnnAGlp4kEXJFovSXa8VzBDm9kvTTMMJZUb3SlceV8YTXr382vM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783467109; c=relaxed/simple; bh=1o9GasjyRG7VkwsP2i9tjfr6NHhBE2xcqSB732UHFu0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=unu/NCjP0PEeoclwP8DL+jDhQQah0Ui0GcgYb3ceWpxMahTlwAZhwR+mQ2/0f+I/BQ4s8q8WG3TTnVqfA8fUFijk6GCVRmO3sDjCylBysMu4JRTTHK3u6uJ8YCIx9Tnpo/891Idd5ICaRlmGnzQ7sP5tbh0YYeW5kBM1jIQArCo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=XL08PlqP; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="XL08PlqP" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 69EC61F000E9; Tue, 7 Jul 2026 23:31:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1783467108; bh=dkTHGFBJaM/pBTpgRVxWI+W9Dt9g2gJVwODYrceqbmU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=XL08PlqPsErNP7eaBtBzkDZPcg4RtirpgjPyQ392NkdWbT4E/K60tsAmRUiXc5YgV zXfDmab8IM9jjIDl0WV8HA7bvshNN8xLDyV0t/hKMdY3ltX1OJ18sQECakZfcBQy4x oJpjyRHRCcLkV9kaVvwqwzjL1oHVt+WtUh+ykjh0ZC4lgimcwzAQ/UDDQifiQIX5oX JJVAocnGYfdjiFirMvh8A0gtUmfz3sraoQ5uQDuwO4deELyF+xx9XvKuBEXyEUbWWu EpoGB4VJbDbEDEXAMnTocku71Zf/lCATDO8Vb7nGuYIJQ8ev8Or9Coe4XBm9sMZ6vt zKlo99lmwmPeg== From: Thomas Gleixner To: Mark Brown , Yuwen Chen Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, andrealmeid@igalia.com, bigeasy@linutronix.de, colin.i.king@gmail.com, dave@stgolabs.net, dvhart@infradead.org, edliaw@google.com, justinstitt@google.com, kernel-team@android.com, licayy@foxmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, luto@mit.edu, mingo@redhat.com, morbo@google.com, nathan@kernel.org, ndesaulniers@google.com, peterz@infradead.org, shuah@kernel.org, usama.anjum@collabora.com, wakel@google.com, mark.rutland@arm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/2] selftests/futex: fix the failed futex_requeue test issue In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2026 01:31:45 +0200 Message-ID: <87cxwys7fi.ffs@fw13> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Tue, Jul 07 2026 at 23:28, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, May 18, 2026 at 10:16:54AM +0800, Yuwen Chen wrote: > > I'm seeing failures on arm64 (running a system with 4xA53) in -next in > this test which bisect to this commit, the commit seems obviously > plausible but I didn't actually investigate: > > # TAP version 13 > 1..2 > # Starting 2 tests from 1 test cases. > # RUN global.requeue_single ... > # futex_requeue.c:28:requeue_single:Expected res (-1) == 0 (0) > # futex_requeue.c:29:requeue_single:waiter failed errno 110: Connection timed out > # futex_requeue.c:49:requeue_single:Expected futex_wait_for_thread(&waiter, _metadata) (110) == 0 (0) > # futex_requeue.c:50:requeue_single:Wait for thread failed Do you have /proc/ disabled by chance or is it not accessible for the test case? > Full log should be at: > > https://lava.sirena.org.uk/scheduler/job/2954705#L13289 > > but I'm having a terrible time with AI scrapers right now so perhaps not > usefully. Seems to correlate with the test case failure: Connection timed out :)