From: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>, lufei <lufei@uniontech.com>
Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] unshare_test: set nr_open using soft limit
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2025 15:30:32 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87e72133-03f0-48fe-ac0d-3f2ac278357a@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250409055656.GA231133@pevik>
On 4/8/25 23:56, Petr Vorel wrote:
>> On 3/31/25 19:55, lufei wrote:
>>> Set maximum file descriptor number limit by rlimit.rlim_max than
>>> nr_open(hard limit). Hard limit may cause dup2 fail.
>
>>> Signed-off-by: lufei <lufei@uniontech.com>
>
>> Petr, Al,
>
>> Okay to take this patch?
>
> LGTM, hopefully I haven't overlook anything.
>
> Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
>
> FYI Cyril Hrubis suggested a different approach (for LTP tests which is based on
> this Al's test):
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/ltp/Z-u7yYJpTBG8Hi6A@yuki.lan/
> https://lore.kernel.org/ltp/Z-vwYZxLms8juTjX@yuki.lan/
>
> filedescriptor that is >= 64 and set the nr_open to 64.
>
> That would help to avoid using /proc/sys/fs/nr_open.
>
Thank you for this suggestion.
lufei, Can you look into this as a solution? Also the short log
should include the subsystem: e.:
selftests:core: unshare_test: -----
thanks,
-- Shuah
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-09 21:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-01 1:55 [PATCH v2] unshare_test: set nr_open using soft limit lufei
2025-04-08 23:42 ` Shuah Khan
2025-04-09 5:56 ` Petr Vorel
2025-04-09 21:30 ` Shuah Khan [this message]
2025-04-10 2:05 ` Lu Fei
2025-04-14 2:17 ` [PATCH v3] selftests:core: unshare_test: using bits_per_long instead of nr_open+64 lufei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87e72133-03f0-48fe-ac0d-3f2ac278357a@linuxfoundation.org \
--to=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lufei@uniontech.com \
--cc=pvorel@suse.cz \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox