From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30828206F31; Tue, 8 Apr 2025 09:00:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744102854; cv=none; b=FmLuMw9FV2VTnPdcWBX/6/lNIXKmTmXSSp4JWc+EzFUXTAq95m1G7QlAniLwxQ+LG0aSc+5PI1VTqbGfC/W34UL+bNzgX63Z3s++UAqnW7Kno2zjrdD2js+WT37Drwif1r49NB8ZLpQwloteptj0iZ9x8twvqWC4vH7mwIGmob0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744102854; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Z/pcvKfgNqZVt5kg+UI9M+1DEbsC3c9S7vBAF3ADiIM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=USbycY9t66Jl03CvVVEuJQ1VDVxQpa7ZmgvIP0oDgoQ/XEqRENU3jDS9iYLczn6SfHe85eGgVBhgEU7CmFCIHPoTHupnJpUmiotkDbB8et5Pb//dD1zwVmzo1mKXec3sleSYwWYc8+GLPnKQ84QSHDx7sc6xO7ZWqd9SA+tD0C8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=FLTcbOre; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=RAAYx+1g; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="FLTcbOre"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="RAAYx+1g" From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1744102851; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Z/pcvKfgNqZVt5kg+UI9M+1DEbsC3c9S7vBAF3ADiIM=; b=FLTcbOrekMjaZiOAywyNvzZAWxshyzHJMfAuKxuvSgOQQxrTv3pGJSv5wXNlH7AznJ/Bxj BzB7j6vBE/VsSyPfgr48tMz+VU6RbZO9E3TmpGeaNGVHthaZ82XU1S2vJV8cvLO3CcZ7r0 VYxpaACs/+forcgxrjUfhDmNO24pH+LaBdMftEOtzuftXWGq2pFE4LAc7lbrDea5EYTSL1 N4NPQqkvEt/Nl198DNKzORZloyygiBTntm+vnV3Be+saXmLjYOzJJVv1O+RkcZOe0eZUyq pEGWEi4cuvLsM+Qo82AN8kCDk/jDI0FgMZLtvq2npvtUfSC8JNYKsIwtA7ugcw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1744102851; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Z/pcvKfgNqZVt5kg+UI9M+1DEbsC3c9S7vBAF3ADiIM=; b=RAAYx+1g87X/fuPtv+7fUKIjVyB4ca7ZsoUSkjyxj1pLcsu3OBj+BqWcPw91uI7t2JiPLK J4AZewqWuWcEPiBg== To: Edward Liaw , linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Darren Hart , Davidlohr Bueso , =?utf-8?Q?Andr=C3=A9?= Almeida , Shuah Khan Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@android.com, Edward Liaw Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/futex: futex_waitv wouldblock test should fail In-Reply-To: <20250404221225.1596324-1-edliaw@google.com> References: <20250404221225.1596324-1-edliaw@google.com> Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2025 11:00:50 +0200 Message-ID: <87ldsbuiwt.ffs@tglx> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Fri, Apr 04 2025 at 22:12, Edward Liaw wrote: > Testcase should fail if -EWOULDBLOCK is not returned when expected value > differs from actual value from the waiter. > > Fixes: 9d57f7c79748920636f8293d2f01192d702fe390 ("selftests: futex: Test sys_futex_waitv() wouldblock") > Signed-off-by: Edward Liaw Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner