From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ej1-f53.google.com (mail-ej1-f53.google.com [209.85.218.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E46731813F for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2025 12:58:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.218.53 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763643507; cv=none; b=kTTB+XoY0NFblBB52/RshZ/MTGcyuByb3C7vaY0S891AVcBm0ragptsk4qQn0W3iMr2gerfgW+co3W9BE2lhQ96DCaU71nQHfnh7LD2PDaaFjVi15sTaUZjAMpVUf0gDAPTsVkDxUkpuQLY6www8t/Txup3Zaw0q22um3M15uB8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763643507; c=relaxed/simple; bh=yrrGT9RTCWN6v25Jy1PljEJyV2gwJA+0BkSczHJvwqU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Jy9uJz49Pud4WXsNoM4YkUdXwfdMEPL0QdqEe39Enxnxtp8FrfJrGMKAVE+ujMCVcW8XGCnQfRzlTB+Aa83hdYO0rvZq/maodJsMtl8+DOv5+eNGaBPmPEHs4lwR593LyU6mg7oyv5WlQqH7ElkBZUoxn/jsLmBopXFwh3rNuY8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=cloudflare.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cloudflare.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cloudflare.com header.i=@cloudflare.com header.b=S7aqdZIp; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.218.53 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=cloudflare.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cloudflare.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cloudflare.com header.i=@cloudflare.com header.b="S7aqdZIp" Received: by mail-ej1-f53.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-b73b24f1784so156637166b.0 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2025 04:58:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cloudflare.com; s=google09082023; t=1763643505; x=1764248305; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=mime-version:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=rWt1WezTZ5DpLX3MB7doQs98ekhplq8AtMdx/O/O2yc=; b=S7aqdZIpeni1IEmbAnYHWLn6J0Yx8fLyUQLq2Ef1J/WrTksSv4BxKoCb2jI/FILfsc wyaUpjWBz/BvwJf4kYQD+NiacTMcuF09mbR03g0xKuuaaEcWUZY0ezk7DscGdzobZBO6 IejvOvDsDPo+JaQVnqpns0r6JcuL9O4F+ZfF+ihHVAdz8YI6A1CahTv31/CKHY/LU9yC Ov/M4kmm+073daycX90GqfpCkJQ+/Rqz6Nk1cqbwvLkKyIQamctisqo/ubcf2I2VwrkS B6PboTQVBrKutFNcyknsISoH0nwmw1SMBJHDkNKOFWc7T+QzZ4j5bkqBE+4pRTwWedRc Odvg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1763643505; x=1764248305; h=mime-version:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to :from:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=rWt1WezTZ5DpLX3MB7doQs98ekhplq8AtMdx/O/O2yc=; b=tlgWt1TzxC1o1eB2HXyHHHzsTADTDINg6T838TeghEekBXnuZvgEt66D2TmEUwiz+S sLqdrbpSIFIyVfU9b8Tz2HByEbPPA9UALsX36hyzpiowQvgktfHMGsIUxbpxI9dFnS7Z I0q21cmwkwefFkBHOuqDiXc77H5WmGzHulWaGCtpRiJCr+LXKHmByzbXDrBfX8FX94xZ 9BRPNcuXHqah/PQdif2e/4vbXknbvMjdVoP9rLil8EjrqvW8n5RRoY/irQHAeu9NSVd9 VvhG/7LJYnM+MhQBOTc0JCYtpivfh5aHUer2LAtUp80zrmRpvwnaQGvsqkaWPTeAn/9O VY8A== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVwZBEqyYOJKNAz1EUOBBxqiF0PjxNEjURw6iw+CGCvhJApkzJHofwDn5BqdneLEctCBGmve/wol0ANAuJ6uL0=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyndMj24W/7Ff0JCFDRr9HRNHnLkW3GsAvpsIiEFDlu2zymvVtt XIg5CFKlvE96A4YrXV3Nd0/Stm530nzyQyigtO8dyQ5JcjDyxVGMi2UsPfvazorNfSA= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnctMFtny6NoIAg7V4ANhP69qb627+RPKhMcPYzgFN+ZpgsD0nNa9dobHG/ozlj1 uHwvm7nTJz9shKXbx59xZFDC+3raQGBa35pDdP9YJODPV6kTKy9Rr99Ei75el7DqszkFKme7O1m vUhUJpU/eGUuigZk9is9IhigPcvjjSe6Vedh2P8r9JTmXoztJlmgqhrrWAWuiUGgd3zjHJnJ1lV hHt80RwwiAuuvsQ+dhsRQxJtA3DGlM3IqVDgjxN+1qXVedvXw+txudORugLVCV3lURWyT/XLnVF 8To4DDnWlh8PinVpl12Oy/2iEBBXWPCkqUsNe5QMUG89OeXeWz4lL6gcu3+NOva/IBTQ6pI1zg5 peeWCvb/HUcQRGBXwRHYAti14zdUBzWCyHYaA/ySbD1QmlHg3jGgimyeScEM4Ev5jaPPeyilgYI tas8E= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGx1D4Lf3+ONX9DYRjufCOc1Fw/EfSu7B0mNDhtvWXtJYLURbexh3sFGvbZtkfpHNbDzHlRQg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:9487:b0:b04:48b5:6ea5 with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-b765720a6e1mr306820066b.17.1763643504589; Thu, 20 Nov 2025 04:58:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from cloudflare.com ([2a09:bac5:5063:2387::38a:71]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a640c23a62f3a-b7654fd4e51sm201000466b.42.2025.11.20.04.58.23 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 20 Nov 2025 04:58:23 -0800 (PST) From: Jakub Sitnicki To: "Jiayuan Chen" Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, "John Fastabend" , "David S. Miller" , "Eric Dumazet" , "Jakub Kicinski" , "Paolo Abeni" , "Simon Horman" , "Neal Cardwell" , "Kuniyuki Iwashima" , "David Ahern" , "Alexei Starovoitov" , "Daniel Borkmann" , "Andrii Nakryiko" , "Martin KaFai Lau" , "Eduard Zingerman" , "Song Liu" , "Yonghong Song" , "KP Singh" , "Stanislav Fomichev" , "Hao Luo" , "Jiri Olsa" , "Shuah Khan" , "Michal Luczaj" , "Stefano Garzarella" , "Cong Wang" , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1 1/3] bpf, sockmap: Fix incorrect copied_seq calculation In-Reply-To: <5a66955891ef8db94b7288bbb296efcc0ac357cf@linux.dev> (Jiayuan Chen's message of "Thu, 20 Nov 2025 02:49:43 +0000") References: <20251117110736.293040-1-jiayuan.chen@linux.dev> <20251117110736.293040-2-jiayuan.chen@linux.dev> <87zf8h6bpd.fsf@cloudflare.com> <5a66955891ef8db94b7288bbb296efcc0ac357cf@linux.dev> Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2025 13:58:23 +0100 Message-ID: <87tsyo6ets.fsf@cloudflare.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Thu, Nov 20, 2025 at 02:49 AM GMT, Jiayuan Chen wrote: > November 20, 2025 at 03:53, "Jakub Sitnicki" wrote: > > [...] >> > +/* The BPF program sets BPF_F_INGRESS on sk_msg to indicate data needs to be >> > + * redirected to the ingress queue of a specified socket. Since BPF_F_INGRESS is >> > + * defined in UAPI so that we can't extend this enum for our internal flags. We >> > + * define some internal flags here while inheriting BPF_F_INGRESS. >> > + */ >> > +enum { >> > + SK_MSG_F_INGRESS = BPF_F_INGRESS, /* (1ULL << 0) */ >> > + /* internal flag */ >> > + SK_MSG_F_INGRESS_SELF = (1ULL << 1) >> > +}; >> > + >> > >> I'm wondering if we need additional state to track this. >> Can we track sk_msg's construted from skb's that were not redirected by >> setting `sk_msg.sk = sk` to indicate that the source socket is us in >> sk_psock_skb_ingress_self()? > > Functionally, that would work. However, in that case, we would have to hold > a reference to sk until the sk_msg is read, which would delay the release of > sk. One concern is that if there is a bug in the read-side application, sk > might never be released. We don't need to grab a reference to sk if we're talking about setting it only in sk_psock_skb_ingress_self(). psock already holds a ref for psock->sk, and we purge psock->ingress_msg queue when destroying the psock before releasing the sock ref in sk_psock_destroy(). While there's nothing wrong with an internal flaag, I'm trying to see if we make things somewhat consistent so as a result sk_msg state is easier to reason about. My thinking here is that we already set sk_msg.sk to source socket in sk_psock_msg_verdict() on sendmsg() path, so we know that this is the purpose of that field. We could mimic this on recvmsg() path.