From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 228FAC19437 for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 15:56:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D018323AAC for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 15:56:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730227AbgLHP4h (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Dec 2020 10:56:37 -0500 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]:39772 "EHLO galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729558AbgLHP4h (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Dec 2020 10:56:37 -0500 From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1607442954; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=zLoKOU+kSW7kZX0dODC+sT6g6ygfkbwnnbOdUP+fpIo=; b=YNEqf/mqLSmjBmP5ZGf5eHu12lDeWGEzyauSFZAHPkhNVHZ1/AlNAqqBPKV7Wk4RaFHIGJ xw+JhkXoG1lzOSOOV44QRn+kYn/uRbW0SwbEHU9i24YAkRr5r38Q6CP2rpn56gigMEdWL1 HMMQPjUWoDQhvMK1Ejpzf6kjbKeHvGDAt2nulDNCRwCN6R+eVKoK9GDHsV/EWGPBTYQ95o FJaY6t3dBgA0WtPuhtS8j4M/sxcSKM3xflf4o0uEViYQ3ccAFTNoP07V4Uw9VOg5+bnb13 m33F8u0g5ENeP//5nmPwIFr2XPcSO7wjFthT0v2C1FB67BUBOjzvq0Pl6JEYvw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1607442954; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=zLoKOU+kSW7kZX0dODC+sT6g6ygfkbwnnbOdUP+fpIo=; b=5eK4E9Ikvqh6D2TZGskNvX7QoOS3LoBgXize7jGZM3c/9qut1GtVzf/vcoIv5MUQ/DOWqH HrwKMSeV0laYDOAQ== To: Ira Weiny , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Andy Lutomirski , Peter Zijlstra , Dave Hansen Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Fenghua Yu , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Dan Williams , Greg KH Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 00/10] PKS: Add Protection Keys Supervisor (PKS) support V3 In-Reply-To: <20201207221431.GL1563847@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> References: <20201106232908.364581-1-ira.weiny@intel.com> <20201207221431.GL1563847@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2020 16:55:54 +0100 Message-ID: <87v9dc2sxh.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Ira, On Mon, Dec 07 2020 at 14:14, Ira Weiny wrote: > Is there any chance of this landing before the kmap stuff gets sorted out? I have marked this as needs an update because the change log of 5/10 sucks. https://lore.kernel.org/r/87lff1xcmv.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de > It would be nice to have this in 5.11 to build off of. It would be nice if people follow up on review request :) Thanks, tglx