From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B922CC4332F for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2022 07:56:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232481AbiLBH4s (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Dec 2022 02:56:48 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33960 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232504AbiLBH4V (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Dec 2022 02:56:21 -0500 Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.220.28]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9CFAA4334 for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2022 23:54:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from imap1.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap1.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.73]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59D9321BDC; Fri, 2 Dec 2022 07:54:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_rsa; t=1669967683; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=SZRVzq8sY0vftKWe+iY9HQ+3uMjMKDXQEOhQ9QaYl2c=; b=aKxPtLCo1Y16oXbEIOJP38Nzd3pxMdR2M4vW1C8hZU2G+5VqYY1lPlQfxQZWfb8wFDDlKA ZtiDgL1nMXNcrEFLoX/0+jcLYZgb3A6snsWIotoRJTkFRTDcoToIqb0jegkZwuSeD/M0/n UrN50y4I8+SgF/rzwOFmJSWahvoz9XM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1669967683; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=SZRVzq8sY0vftKWe+iY9HQ+3uMjMKDXQEOhQ9QaYl2c=; b=IX3aH0UaL//a0qV2Bgw6KRctrBom7YC3wKxTnQUUdIOmkUJji+WIxc/WoE+i5gnBTmpytJ E2mCVm/kPYVZtvDg== Received: from imap1.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap1.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.73]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36CF713644; Fri, 2 Dec 2022 07:54:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap1.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id 68uQC0OviWOqFAAAGKfGzw (envelope-from ); Fri, 02 Dec 2022 07:54:43 +0000 Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2022 08:54:44 +0100 Message-ID: <87wn7akzp7.wl-tiwai@suse.de> From: Takashi Iwai To: Mark Brown Cc: Jaroslav Kysela , Shuah Khan , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] kselftest/alsa: pcm-test improvements In-Reply-To: <87y1rqkzto.wl-tiwai@suse.de> References: <20221130000608.519574-1-broonie@kernel.org> <87359zlz9t.wl-tiwai@suse.de> <87y1rqkzto.wl-tiwai@suse.de> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/27.2 Mule/6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 02 Dec 2022 08:52:03 +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > On Thu, 01 Dec 2022 21:29:48 +0100, > Mark Brown wrote: > > > > On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 08:06:22PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > > On Thu, 01 Dec 2022 18:42:22 +0100, > > > Jaroslav Kysela wrote: > > > > > > > > Let me know, if I can stack your changes on top, or perhaps, you may > > > > be willing to adapt them. > > > > > > As Mark has already sent a v2 series, I applied his v2 at first. > > > Could you rebase and resubmit on top of my for-next branch? > > > > Oh, this is getting a little confusing - I'd just picked Jaroslav's > > patch into my tree and was in the middle redoing my ideas on top of his > > code! I might have something more later this evening... I think we can > > converge here, let me continue taking a look. > > Ah then it was my misunderstanding, and everything should be fine now > ;) Thanks! Erm, you meant sent as *v3*. I've seen now. As the v2 patches were already merged, could you rather rebase and resubmit? I'd like to avoid rebase the full series that are already included in linux-next. Apologies for the mess. Takashi