From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E6D418C011; Fri, 15 Aug 2025 03:15:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.9 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755227728; cv=none; b=M1AoK895o51J6zdu8P7ftkTll8GkTADis3aEA5erh0m57QlSmjThX2c+cnvHbXRYKPwUpGDdgQvE134BilLrTKVX5D3ig2+cEc2BkD+Q569MWHFAsvZwVM1WsEWP9ckwtF6wyaiiraLxW6yWEcddOZKX+SS/eldRRabjBykzDtk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755227728; c=relaxed/simple; bh=fC1mrUytUG74MKUNflCkOvX5lW6hkNqnNNZ7FyLjNIk=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=hFqugJSGyaCYwBrg3ZJ8men8CprDvUpqM16idRKwq0ot5i+PBvlRtfu1R+uUqNdY9OkVaOqgMxEW8tu5zzzTAs5p/kKa7rKMn+oA2u+Jl+mlIilRlFRozKn1/C4hd95XmDST7ckdxBRZGi5tAG6WZJTFSDyNAQltxDA6Qw3C3w8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=kF4AR4Hm; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.9 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="kF4AR4Hm" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1755227727; x=1786763727; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fC1mrUytUG74MKUNflCkOvX5lW6hkNqnNNZ7FyLjNIk=; b=kF4AR4HmpnP0KjgcbW6BuHcyyJ8+CKKyjFT/2a+aSkPEA+Dfg+2DbovR w5gebYf1D5mCRhl60Lrocs8MGW45TjVbWkwZAW74fNkY0uLMQ0TU6f4nB I7wod7D29H1Vo5TUed1YjbQhTSSNxArka77mPAnmBywA1RkgVHyBiBVfi opHhKkvgkQNiocrXn8hYSkzUxfvZV+A/D0IZNk0PyebwVeNZ8Fd6Kyh0k FjnE4PPJ3qnR8VXRWXuaj29a1L+204+01Tz9XvgomguMTw+Adsn7Rhklq d31q/4yWEAt8PJN2vu4tVbejRbPsWYt6HzXZmf+gnM8wBMiexua77rLSE A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: OjLVpetZRVWiitcFTxvUBg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 1xQXv2FtTVOr9WdEqygXNA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11522"; a="80134704" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.17,290,1747724400"; d="scan'208";a="80134704" Received: from fmviesa006.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.146]) by orvoesa101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Aug 2025 20:15:26 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: gWE2MD7FSsO1FMn9GpkNvw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 7azx2Hb7QE2UY2Q4NI5dPg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.17,290,1747724400"; d="scan'208";a="166834945" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.238.0.107]) ([10.238.0.107]) by fmviesa006-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Aug 2025 20:15:21 -0700 Message-ID: <8b76b1d7-edc9-4677-8069-a428e1067050@linux.intel.com> Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2025 11:15:19 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 25/30] KVM: selftests: KVM: selftests: Expose new vm_vaddr_alloc_private() To: Sean Christopherson , Sagi Shahar Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini , Shuah Khan , Ackerley Tng , Ryan Afranji , Andrew Jones , Isaku Yamahata , Erdem Aktas , Rick Edgecombe , Roger Wang , Oliver Upton , "Pratik R. Sampat" , Reinette Chatre , Ira Weiny , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org References: <20250807201628.1185915-1-sagis@google.com> <20250807201628.1185915-26-sagis@google.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Binbin Wu In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 8/12/2025 5:07 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote: > On Thu, Aug 07, 2025, Sagi Shahar wrote: >> From: Ackerley Tng >> >> vm_vaddr_alloc_private allow specifying both the virtual and physical >> addresses for the allocation. > Why? > Yeah, this is not needed. vm_vaddr_alloc() will handle it as private memory by default if the vm has protected memory.