From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-il1-f172.google.com (mail-il1-f172.google.com [209.85.166.172]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00CED200CB7 for ; Wed, 6 Nov 2024 17:02:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.166.172 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730912524; cv=none; b=afg6Jcxn/LV48rVEq0BEih+ro3eQqipd+5ANJf22GrjvLQKm9Rnw3Ba9/Z+DQNYKEPf/B5zf7OYt4KdwDhyXVb5Uq7/inP7O91nd8Wc/OXAtPJwUR3be+tSESrTz7mHbLVZdNVUKm9tgT0kBNMJeBgYlChmnY7fAxMQweoP9XG8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730912524; c=relaxed/simple; bh=q1WeBHGD5h1tHIzQJ3J0B4q74CaQ/9M3+/9g556AVjs=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=LE6ybMjn9Zws2DyWtvJiAGLlYTujLB8VdSy/JIDITuXNPRgGEupUSKHwr3fRxVIIE7ljJIWM2Wi2CzTXs6cscvkD6FWKjyMU8vVXimHPg8XpW1FyIZtwPVOgztI0k9l8GR8yodMYrQyguuu+J5Xodm1QMJ1wJERgtTM2HNsuYb4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linuxfoundation.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxfoundation.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=Y1Z5JiAh; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.166.172 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxfoundation.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="Y1Z5JiAh" Received: by mail-il1-f172.google.com with SMTP id e9e14a558f8ab-3a394418442so339715ab.0 for ; Wed, 06 Nov 2024 09:02:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; t=1730912521; x=1731517321; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=CGwC2Hl3MxKojtjjrNlDFREWkdarOnfG+IIyc3QOx0E=; b=Y1Z5JiAhxUTxhmEZ2RQy+weWn8XXMrhpdctCJMcd5GMVOl0rhEurvIpqIlOv+DDaox ls2t/UaRZ0Vwuez2eJv3MWkgtj4htC4v3T4ky/LqcdCwb7B2Y7SIgNrDs3xRVvPRt77v l8AXsofuhgPVW9oV82cQdi67Fxrnzb5eNqozU= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1730912521; x=1731517321; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=CGwC2Hl3MxKojtjjrNlDFREWkdarOnfG+IIyc3QOx0E=; b=T+C+WODVFbwZaTQTNuBVLzZIn7KzEMtg/0V0pzDeXgaYAW6ZGeDmqbzyoWTU26dEXL RE68IwK0Iew7g+tP7RPdxa93RancR8IGk2+cOzoT+gCPbt3dnyOg6xiF8TbweVCoC+fp MFpOMoSjj1PaBbyhNPi57IvzwKG/n0szRvbqaktom9/Y6Ct8GfSyfJTlCmShgUy52BAK 5jkhOIQrYaTzt7Vxgt0kMhjT5htWyz1dnCX3KY2cpptlkC59gSE9yytyCjKMsmwS9wg6 GrZkGhVXSRglcVpZtFOuYViiOh4PNfpUCdH2P/VQdTL0H5B8p0Yq7xzTP4ACsVpVkK1h DIsA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzK2hItlOYswSUsKGDuYeH3s7eowbdYiAhcyug+14ivJO94vIwb SsjhOQJUtp2JPBCdZs3FLv32kPucj7x07CjeXXb3Dq26RVfmSjDH2w2bcSstkd0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGpeyiohwTOy3CiKjinzWrPekKa3XkMj9Vgkkbqp5ZVCiUarzkfx8daEIGTgTOBqI7LMwudKg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:1946:b0:3a3:b527:e809 with SMTP id e9e14a558f8ab-3a6b0327357mr188862495ab.14.1730912520864; Wed, 06 Nov 2024 09:02:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.128] ([38.175.170.29]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e9e14a558f8ab-3a6bd2da409sm26213575ab.57.2024.11.06.09.01.59 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 06 Nov 2024 09:02:00 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <920c61a8-4c5b-4386-a072-7c4e0f3a48c8@linuxfoundation.org> Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 10:01:59 -0700 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] selftests: tmpfs: Add kselftest support to tmpfs To: Shivam Chaudhary Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org References: <20241105202639.1977356-1-cvam0000@gmail.com> <20241105202639.1977356-3-cvam0000@gmail.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Shuah Khan In-Reply-To: <20241105202639.1977356-3-cvam0000@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 11/5/24 13:26, Shivam Chaudhary wrote: > Replace direct error handling with 'ksft_test_result_*', > 'ksft_print_msg' and KSFT_SKIP macros for better reporting. > > Test logs: > > Before change: > > - Without root > error: unshare, errno 1 > > - With root > No, output > > After change: > > - Without root > TAP version 13 > 1..1 > ok 1 # SKIP This test needs root to run > > - With root > TAP version 13 > 1..1 > unshare(): Creat new mount namespace: Success. > mount(): Root filesystem private mount: Success > mount(): Mounting tmpfs on /tmp: Success > openat(): Open first temporary file: Success > linkat(): Linking the temporary file: Success > openat(): Opening the second temporary file: Success This is too noisy - there is no need to add message in every single conditional. Errors make sense, bot don't add unnecessary messages. > ok 1 Test : Success > Totals: pass:1 fail:0 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0 > > Signed-off-by: Shivam Chaudhary > --- > > .../selftests/tmpfs/bug-link-o-tmpfile.c | 66 ++++++++++++++----- > 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/tmpfs/bug-link-o-tmpfile.c b/tools/testing/selftests/tmpfs/bug-link-o-tmpfile.c > index cdab1e8c0392..f2e6a5b20698 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/tmpfs/bug-link-o-tmpfile.c > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/tmpfs/bug-link-o-tmpfile.c > @@ -42,39 +42,71 @@ int main(void) > > if (unshare(CLONE_NEWNS) == -1) { > if (errno == ENOSYS || errno == EPERM) { > - fprintf(stderr, "error: unshare, errno %d\n", errno); > - return 4; > + ksft_print_msg("unshare() error: unshare, errno %d\n", errno); > + exit(KSFT_SKIP); Same comment - you can simply use approrpiare ksft_exit_*() routine. > + > + } > + else{ > + fprintf(stderr, "unshare() error: unshare, errno %d\n", errno); > + return 1; Since you are converting the test to use KSFT_ codes, why not change this one? Shound't this ksft_exit_fail_msg() > + > } > - fprintf(stderr, "error: unshare, errno %d\n", errno); > - return 1; Since you are converting the test to use KSFT_ codes, why not change this one? Shound't this ksft_exit_fail_msg() > + } > + > + else { > + ksft_print_msg("unshare(): Creat new mount namespace: Success.\n"); Spelling - did you tun checkpatch on this? > + > } > - if (mount(NULL, "/", NULL, MS_PRIVATE|MS_REC, NULL) == -1) { > - fprintf(stderr, "error: mount '/', errno %d\n", errno); > - return 1; Since you are converting the test to use KSFT_ codes, why not change this one? Shound't this ksft_exit_fail_msg() Same comment on using KSFT_ codes consistently. > + > + > + > + if (mount(NULL, "/", NULL, MS_PRIVATE | MS_REC, NULL) == -1) { > + ksft_print_msg("mount() error: Root filesystem private mount: Fail %d\n", errno); > + exit(KSFT_SKIP); Why is this a skip? Don't need two calls - ksft_exit_* calls Since you are converting the test to use KSFT_ codes, why not change this one? Shound't this ksft_exit_fail_msg() > + } else { > + ksft_print_msg("mount(): Root filesystem private mount: Success\n"); Is this message necessary? > } > > + > /* Our heroes: 1 root inode, 1 O_TMPFILE inode, 1 permanent inode. */ > if (mount(NULL, "/tmp", "tmpfs", 0, "nr_inodes=3") == -1) { > - fprintf(stderr, "error: mount tmpfs, errno %d\n", errno); > - return 1; > + ksft_print_msg("mount() error: Mounting tmpfs on /tmp: Fail %d\n", errno); > + exit(KSFT_SKIP); > + } else { > + ksft_print_msg("mount(): Mounting tmpfs on /tmp: Success\n"); > } > > - fd = openat(AT_FDCWD, "/tmp", O_WRONLY|O_TMPFILE, 0600); > + > + fd = openat(AT_FDCWD, "/tmp", O_WRONLY | O_TMPFILE, 0600); > if (fd == -1) { > - fprintf(stderr, "error: open 1, errno %d\n", errno); > - return 1; > + ksft_print_msg("openat() error: Open first temporary file: Fail %d\n", errno); > + exit(KSFT_SKIP); > + } else { > + ksft_print_msg("openat(): Open first temporary file: Success\n"); > } > + > + > if (linkat(fd, "", AT_FDCWD, "/tmp/1", AT_EMPTY_PATH) == -1) { > - fprintf(stderr, "error: linkat, errno %d\n", errno); > - return 1; > + ksft_print_msg("linkat() error: Linking the temporary file: Fail %d\n", errno); > + /* Ensure fd is closed on failure */ > + close(fd); > + exit(KSFT_SKIP); > + } else { > + ksft_print_msg("linkat(): Linking the temporary file: Success\n"); > } > close(fd); > > - fd = openat(AT_FDCWD, "/tmp", O_WRONLY|O_TMPFILE, 0600); > + > + fd = openat(AT_FDCWD, "/tmp", O_WRONLY | O_TMPFILE, 0600); > if (fd == -1) { > - fprintf(stderr, "error: open 2, errno %d\n", errno); > - return 1; > + ksft_print_msg("openat() error: Opening the second temporary file: Fail %d\n", errno); > + exit(KSFT_SKIP); > + } else { > + ksft_print_msg("openat(): Opening the second temporary file: Success\n"); > } > > + ksft_test_result_pass("Test : Success\n"); Why do you need a message additional message here. > + ksft_exit_pass(); > return 0; > } > + I didn't call out every single error path. Same comments apply to all. Please get rid of unnecessary success path messages. If the output is too noisy it is hard to read and understand. thanks, -- Shuah