Linux Kernel Selftest development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>
To: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>,
	Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>,
	Naoya Horiguchi <nao.horiguchi@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	"Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com,
	Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] mm/memory-failure: report MF_MSG_KERNEL for reserved pages
Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 10:17:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9504c193-8c01-4d03-8f62-c50fd7fbdbc0@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260511-ecc_panic-v6-1-183012ba7d4b@debian.org>

On 5/11/26 17:38, Breno Leitao wrote:
> When get_hwpoison_page() returns a negative value, distinguish
> reserved pages from other failure cases by reporting MF_MSG_KERNEL
> instead of MF_MSG_GET_HWPOISON. Reserved pages belong to the kernel
> and should be classified accordingly for proper handling.
> 
> Sample PG_reserved before the get_hwpoison_page() call. In the
> MF_COUNT_INCREASED path get_any_page() can drop the caller's
> reference before returning -EIO, after which the underlying page may
> have been freed and reallocated with page->flags reset; reading
> PageReserved(p) at that point would observe stale or unrelated state.
> The pre-call snapshot reflects what the page actually was at the
> time of the failure event.
> 
> Acked-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
> Reviewed-by: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
> Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
> ---
>  mm/memory-failure.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
> index 866c4428ac7ef..f112fb27a8ff6 100644
> --- a/mm/memory-failure.c
> +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
> @@ -2348,6 +2348,7 @@ int memory_failure(unsigned long pfn, int flags)
>  	unsigned long page_flags;
>  	bool retry = true;
>  	int hugetlb = 0;
> +	bool is_reserved;
>  
>  	if (!sysctl_memory_failure_recovery)
>  		panic("Memory failure on page %lx", pfn);
> @@ -2411,6 +2412,18 @@ int memory_failure(unsigned long pfn, int flags)
>  	 * In fact it's dangerous to directly bump up page count from 0,
>  	 * that may make page_ref_freeze()/page_ref_unfreeze() mismatch.
>  	 */
> +	/*
> +	 * Pages with PG_reserved set are not currently managed by the
> +	 * page allocator (memblock-reserved memory, driver reservations,
> +	 * etc.), so classify them as kernel-owned for reporting.
> +	 *
> +	 * Sample the flag before get_hwpoison_page(): in the
> +	 * MF_COUNT_INCREASED path, get_any_page() can drop the caller's
> +	 * reference before returning -EIO, after which page->flags may
> +	 * have been reset by the allocator.
> +	 */
> +	is_reserved = PageReserved(p);
> +
>  	res = get_hwpoison_page(p, flags);
>  	if (!res) {
>  		if (is_free_buddy_page(p)) {
> @@ -2432,7 +2445,11 @@ int memory_failure(unsigned long pfn, int flags)
>  		}
>  		goto unlock_mutex;
>  	} else if (res < 0) {
> -		res = action_result(pfn, MF_MSG_GET_HWPOISON, MF_IGNORED);
> +		if (is_reserved)
> +			res = action_result(pfn, MF_MSG_KERNEL, MF_IGNORED);
> +		else
> +			res = action_result(pfn, MF_MSG_GET_HWPOISON,
> +					    MF_IGNORED);
>  		goto unlock_mutex;
>  	}
>  
> 

It's a bit odd that we need this handling when we already have handling for
reserved pages in error_states[].

HWPoisonHandlable() would always essentially reject PG_reserved pages. So
__get_hwpoison_page() ... would always fail? Making
get_hwpoison_page()->get_any_page() always fail?

But then, we never call identify_page_state()? And never call me_kernel()?

This all looks very odd.

Why would you even want to call get_hwpoison_page() in the first place if you
find PageReserved?

-- 
Cheers,

David

  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-12  8:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-11 15:38 [PATCH v6 0/4] mm/memory-failure: add panic option for unrecoverable pages Breno Leitao
2026-05-11 15:38 ` [PATCH v6 1/4] mm/memory-failure: report MF_MSG_KERNEL for reserved pages Breno Leitao
2026-05-12  8:17   ` David Hildenbrand (Arm) [this message]
2026-05-12 12:48     ` Lance Yang
2026-05-12 13:04     ` Breno Leitao
2026-05-12 17:58     ` jane.chu
2026-05-11 15:38 ` [PATCH v6 2/4] mm/memory-failure: classify get_any_page() failures by reason Breno Leitao
2026-05-12  8:21   ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-05-12 13:33     ` Breno Leitao
2026-05-11 15:38 ` [PATCH v6 3/4] mm/memory-failure: add panic option for unrecoverable pages Breno Leitao
2026-05-12  8:22   ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-05-12 13:05     ` Breno Leitao
2026-05-11 15:38 ` [PATCH v6 4/4] Documentation: document panic_on_unrecoverable_memory_failure sysctl Breno Leitao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9504c193-8c01-4d03-8f62-c50fd7fbdbc0@kernel.org \
    --to=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
    --cc=leitao@debian.org \
    --cc=liam@infradead.org \
    --cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=nao.horiguchi@gmail.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox