From: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>
To: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Cc: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>, David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
Nico Pache <npache@redhat.com>,
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>, Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>,
Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>, Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 11/14] selftests/mm: remove READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS in khugepaged
Date: Fri, 8 May 2026 22:06:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <959238dd-2493-4d9c-ac35-6d04460a8239@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260429153538.727855-7-ziy@nvidia.com>
On 4/29/26 17:35, Zi Yan wrote:
> Change the requirement to a file system with large folio support and the
> supported order needs to include PMD_ORDER.
>
> Also add tests of opening a file with read write permission and populating
> folios with writes. Reuse the XFS image from split_huge_page_test.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/mm/khugepaged.c | 131 +++++++++++++++-------
> tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh | 12 +-
> 2 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/khugepaged.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/khugepaged.c
> index a6bb9d50363d2..80b913185c643 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/khugepaged.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/khugepaged.c
> @@ -49,7 +49,8 @@ struct mem_ops {
> const char *name;
> };
>
> -static struct mem_ops *file_ops;
> +static struct mem_ops *read_only_file_ops;
> +static struct mem_ops *read_write_file_ops;
> static struct mem_ops *anon_ops;
> static struct mem_ops *shmem_ops;
>
> @@ -112,7 +113,8 @@ static void restore_settings(int sig)
> static void save_settings(void)
> {
> printf("Save THP and khugepaged settings...");
> - if (file_ops && finfo.type == VMA_FILE)
> + if ((read_only_file_ops || read_write_file_ops) &&
> + finfo.type == VMA_FILE)
> thp_set_read_ahead_path(finfo.dev_queue_read_ahead_path);
> thp_save_settings();
>
> @@ -364,11 +366,14 @@ static bool anon_check_huge(void *addr, int nr_hpages)
> return check_huge_anon(addr, nr_hpages, hpage_pmd_size);
> }
>
> -static void *file_setup_area(int nr_hpages)
> +static void *file_setup_area_common(int nr_hpages, bool read_only)
> {
> int fd;
> void *p;
> unsigned long size;
> + int open_opt = read_only ? O_RDONLY : O_RDWR;
> + int mmap_prot = read_only ? PROT_READ : (PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE);
> + int mmap_opt = read_only ? MAP_PRIVATE : MAP_SHARED;
Can all be const and read better at the very top of the list.
Why do we go from private->shared depending on "read_only" parameter? I'd assume
we'd want to test MAP_SHARED for both (read-only + read-write)?
>
> unlink(finfo.path); /* Cleanup from previous failed tests */
> printf("Creating %s for collapse%s...", finfo.path,
> @@ -399,14 +404,15 @@ static void *file_setup_area(int nr_hpages)
> munmap(p, size);
> success("OK");
>
> - printf("Opening %s read only for collapse...", finfo.path);
> - finfo.fd = open(finfo.path, O_RDONLY, 777);
> + printf("Opening %s %s for collapse...", finfo.path,
> + read_only ? "read only" : "read-write");
"read-only" ?
> + finfo.fd = open(finfo.path, open_opt, 777);
> if (finfo.fd < 0) {
> perror("open()");
> exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
> }
> - p = mmap(BASE_ADDR, size, PROT_READ,
> - MAP_PRIVATE, finfo.fd, 0);
> + p = mmap(BASE_ADDR, size, mmap_prot,
> + mmap_opt, finfo.fd, 0);
While at it, can fit that into a single line.
> if (p == MAP_FAILED || p != BASE_ADDR) {
> perror("mmap()");
> exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
> @@ -418,6 +424,16 @@ static void *file_setup_area(int nr_hpages)
> return p;
> }
>
> +static void *file_setup_read_only_area(int nr_hpages)
> +{
> + return file_setup_area_common(nr_hpages, /* read_only= */ true);
> +}
> +
> +static void *file_setup_read_write_area(int nr_hpages)
> +{
> + return file_setup_area_common(nr_hpages, /* read_only= */ false);
> +}
> +
> static void file_cleanup_area(void *p, unsigned long size)
> {
> munmap(p, size);
> @@ -425,14 +441,25 @@ static void file_cleanup_area(void *p, unsigned long size)
> unlink(finfo.path);
> }
>
> -static void file_fault(void *p, unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
> +static void file_fault_common(void *p, unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
> + int madv_ops)
> {
> - if (madvise(((char *)p) + start, end - start, MADV_POPULATE_READ)) {
> + if (madvise(((char *)p) + start, end - start, madv_ops)) {
> perror("madvise(MADV_POPULATE_READ");
> exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
> }
> }
>
> +static void file_fault_read(void *p, unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
> +{
> + file_fault_common(p, start, end, MADV_POPULATE_READ);
Do we really want file_fault_common()? I'd say, just inline it. In particular
avoids checking the madv_ops to figure out the error message ...
> +}
> +
> +static void file_fault_write(void *p, unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
> +{
> + file_fault_common(p, start, end, MADV_POPULATE_WRITE);
> +}
> +
> static bool file_check_huge(void *addr, int nr_hpages)
> {
> switch (finfo.type) {
> @@ -488,10 +515,18 @@ static struct mem_ops __anon_ops = {
> .name = "anon",
> };
[...]
> };
>
> +static bool is_tmpfs(struct mem_ops *ops)
> +{
> + return (ops == &__read_only_file_ops ||
> + ops == &__read_write_file_ops) &&
Can't this fit into two lines?
> + finfo.type == VMA_SHMEM;
> +}
> +
> +static bool is_anon(struct mem_ops *ops)
> +{
> + return ops == &__anon_ops;
> +}
> +
> static void __madvise_collapse(const char *msg, char *p, int nr_hpages,
> struct mem_ops *ops, bool expect)
> {
> -
> static void alloc_at_fault(void)
> {
> struct thp_settings settings = *thp_current_settings();
> @@ -1097,8 +1142,8 @@ static void usage(void)
> fprintf(stderr, "\t<context>\t: [all|khugepaged|madvise]\n");
> fprintf(stderr, "\t<mem_type>\t: [all|anon|file|shmem]\n");
> fprintf(stderr, "\n\t\"file,all\" mem_type requires [dir] argument\n");
> - fprintf(stderr, "\n\t\"file,all\" mem_type requires kernel built with\n");
> - fprintf(stderr, "\tCONFIG_READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS=y\n");
> + fprintf(stderr, "\n\t\"file,all\" mem_type requires a file system\n");
> + fprintf(stderr, "\twith large folio support (order >= PMD order)\n");
"with PMD-sized large folio support"?
> fprintf(stderr, "\n\tif [dir] is a (sub)directory of a tmpfs mount, tmpfs must be\n");
> fprintf(stderr, "\tmounted with huge=advise option for khugepaged tests to work\n");
> fprintf(stderr, "\n\tSupported Options:\n");
> @@ -1154,20 +1199,22 @@ static void parse_test_type(int argc, char **argv)
> usage();
--
Cheers,
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-08 20:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-29 15:29 [PATCH v5 00/14] Remove CONFIG_READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS and enable file THP for writable files Zi Yan
2026-04-29 15:29 ` [PATCH v5 01/14] mm/khugepaged: remove READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS check Zi Yan
2026-04-30 14:37 ` Zi Yan
2026-04-30 15:04 ` Andrew Morton
2026-05-04 3:48 ` Nico Pache
2026-05-07 3:29 ` Lance Yang
2026-05-07 5:52 ` Zi Yan
2026-05-07 6:08 ` Zi Yan
2026-05-07 6:57 ` Zi Yan
2026-05-08 19:39 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-29 15:29 ` [PATCH v5 02/14] mm/khugepaged: add folio dirty check after try_to_unmap() Zi Yan
2026-04-30 15:11 ` Zi Yan
2026-05-04 3:53 ` Nico Pache
2026-05-06 5:23 ` Lance Yang
2026-04-29 15:29 ` [PATCH v5 03/14] mm/huge_memory: remove READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS from file_thp_enabled() Zi Yan
2026-05-04 3:57 ` Nico Pache
2026-05-07 4:29 ` Lance Yang
2026-05-08 19:43 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-29 15:29 ` [PATCH v5 04/14] mm/khugepaged: remove READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS check in hugepage_enabled() Zi Yan
2026-05-04 4:00 ` Nico Pache
2026-05-07 4:49 ` Lance Yang
2026-05-08 18:54 ` Andrew Morton
2026-05-11 7:15 ` Lance Yang
2026-04-29 15:35 ` [PATCH v5 05/14] mm: remove READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS Kconfig option Zi Yan
2026-05-04 4:02 ` Nico Pache
2026-05-07 12:48 ` Lance Yang
2026-05-08 2:52 ` Wei Yang
2026-05-08 3:22 ` Lance Yang
2026-04-29 15:35 ` [PATCH v5 06/14] mm: fs: remove filemap_nr_thps*() functions and their users Zi Yan
2026-05-07 12:59 ` Lance Yang
2026-04-29 15:35 ` [PATCH v5 07/14] fs: remove nr_thps from struct address_space Zi Yan
2026-05-04 4:11 ` Nico Pache
2026-04-29 15:35 ` [PATCH v5 08/14] mm/huge_memory: remove folio split check for READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS Zi Yan
2026-04-29 15:35 ` [PATCH v5 09/14] mm/truncate: use folio_split() in truncate_inode_partial_folio() Zi Yan
2026-04-30 15:12 ` Zi Yan
2026-05-08 7:01 ` Lance Yang
2026-05-08 19:46 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-29 15:35 ` [PATCH v5 10/14] fs/btrfs: remove a comment referring to READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS Zi Yan
2026-04-29 15:35 ` [PATCH v5 11/14] selftests/mm: remove READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS in khugepaged Zi Yan
2026-04-30 15:16 ` Zi Yan
2026-04-30 15:27 ` Zi Yan
2026-05-08 19:48 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-05-04 4:23 ` Nico Pache
2026-05-06 13:11 ` Zi Yan
2026-05-08 19:51 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-05-04 10:11 ` Nico Pache
2026-05-06 13:15 ` Zi Yan
2026-05-07 6:35 ` Nico Pache
2026-05-07 7:21 ` Zi Yan
2026-05-07 7:24 ` Zi Yan
2026-05-08 20:06 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm) [this message]
2026-04-29 15:35 ` [PATCH v5 12/14] selftests/mm: remove READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS code from guard-regions Zi Yan
2026-04-29 15:35 ` [PATCH v5 13/14] mm/khugepaged: enable clean pagecache folio collapse for writable files Zi Yan
2026-04-30 15:18 ` Zi Yan
2026-05-08 20:09 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-05-08 7:46 ` Lance Yang
2026-05-08 20:13 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-29 15:35 ` [PATCH v5 14/14] selftests/mm: add writable-file collapse tests for khugepaged Zi Yan
2026-04-29 16:13 ` [PATCH v5 00/14] Remove CONFIG_READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS and enable file THP for writable files Andrew Morton
2026-05-09 22:10 ` Zi Yan
2026-05-11 7:19 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=959238dd-2493-4d9c-ac35-6d04460a8239@kernel.org \
--to=david@kernel.org \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=npache@redhat.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox