Re: [PATCH] Build guest_memfd_test also on arm64.

[Itaru Kitayama <itaru.kitayama@linux.dev>]

> On May 8, 2024, at 15:41, Itaru Kitayama <itaru.kitayama@linux.dev> wrote:
> 
> Hi Paolo,
> 
>> On Feb 23, 2024, at 17:57, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
>> 
>> On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 12:44 AM Itaru Kitayama
>> <itaru.kitayama@linux.dev> wrote:
>>> on arm64 KVM_CAP_GUEST_MEMDF capability is not enabled, but
>>> guest_memfd_test can build on arm64, let's build it on arm64 as well.
>> 
>> The test will be skipped, so there's no point in compiling it.
> 
> It’s not merged yet, but the Arm CCA support series V2 is out there, would you consider building it for arm64
> as well?

Unless KVM_CAP_GUEST_MEMFD is supported in arm64, you think it should not be built at all?
Then, I will build them locally for now.

Thanks,
Itaru.

> 
> Thanks,
> Itaru.
> 
>> 
>> Paolo
>> 
>>> Signed-off-by: Itaru Kitayama <itaru.kitayama@fujitsu.com>
>>> ---
>>> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile | 1 +
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>> 
>>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
>>> index 492e937fab00..8a4f8afb81ca 100644
>>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
>>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
>>> @@ -158,6 +158,7 @@ TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += access_tracking_perf_test
>>> TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += demand_paging_test
>>> TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += dirty_log_test
>>> TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += dirty_log_perf_test
>>> +TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += guest_memfd_test
>>> TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += guest_print_test
>>> TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += get-reg-list
>>> TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += kvm_create_max_vcpus
>>> 
>>> ---
>>> base-commit: 39133352cbed6626956d38ed72012f49b0421e7b
>>> change-id: 20240222-memfd-7285f9564c1e
>>> 
>>> Best regards,
>>> --
>>> Itaru Kitayama <itaru.kitayama@linux.dev>
>>> 
>> 
>