Linux Kernel Selftest development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] KVM: selftests: arm64: Report register reset tests individually
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2026 14:42:39 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <99f23278-47de-4ee5-8ca5-18387f187f16@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251219-kvm-arm64-set-id-regs-aarch64-v3-2-bfa474ec3218@kernel.org>

Hi Mark,

On 12/19/25 19:28, Mark Brown wrote:
> set_id_regs tests that registers have their values preserved over reset.
> Currently it reports all registers in a single test with an instantly fatal
> assert which isn't great for diagnostics, it's hard to tell which register
> failed or if it's just one register. Change this to report each register as
> a separate test so that it's clear from the program output which registers
> have problems.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/set_id_regs.c | 14 ++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 

Reviewed-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>

Thanks,

Ben


  reply	other threads:[~2026-01-02 14:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-19 19:28 [PATCH v3 0/4] KVM: selftests: arm64: Improve diagnostics from set_id_regs Mark Brown
2025-12-19 19:28 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] KVM: selftests: arm64: Report set_id_reg reads of test registers as tests Mark Brown
2026-01-02 14:40   ` Ben Horgan
2025-12-19 19:28 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] KVM: selftests: arm64: Report register reset tests individually Mark Brown
2026-01-02 14:42   ` Ben Horgan [this message]
2025-12-19 19:28 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] KVM: selftests: arm64: Make set_id_regs bitfield validatity checks non-fatal Mark Brown
2026-01-02 14:45   ` Ben Horgan
2026-01-05 12:15     ` Mark Brown
2025-12-19 19:28 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] KVM: selftests: arm64: Skip all 32 bit IDs when set_id_regs is aarch64 only Mark Brown
2026-01-02 14:50   ` Ben Horgan
2026-01-05 16:45     ` Mark Brown
2026-01-05 17:00       ` Ben Horgan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=99f23278-47de-4ee5-8ca5-18387f187f16@arm.com \
    --to=ben.horgan@arm.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oupton@kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox