linux-kselftest.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/xe/tests: Fix some additional gen_params signatures
@ 2025-08-21 13:54 David Gow
  2025-08-21 13:54 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] kunit: Only output a test plan if we're using kunit_array_gen_params David Gow
  2025-08-21 20:16 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/xe/tests: Fix some additional gen_params signatures Rae Moar
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: David Gow @ 2025-08-21 13:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rae Moar, Marie Zhussupova, marievictoria875, Rodrigo Vivi,
	Shuah Khan
  Cc: David Gow, Stephen Rothwell, Linux Next Mailing List, intel-xe,
	kunit-dev, linux-kselftest, linux-kernel

In 444be9072fca ("kunit: Pass parameterized test context to generate_params()")
prototype used for gen_params functions was changed to add a struct
kunit parameter. However, a few of these used in xe were not updated.

Update these so that the xe_pci tests build and run again.

Fixes: 444be9072fca ("kunit: Pass parameterized test context to generate_params()")
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
---

Sorry, the last fix here caused a warning (thanks to the test robot for
finding it).

I'm still happy to sqash and re-send the whole original series if that's
preferred.

Changes since v1:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20250819073434.1411114-1-davidgow@google.com/
- Add the missing <kunit/test.h> include for struct kunit

---
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_pci.c      | 12 ++++++------
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_pci_test.h |  9 +++++----
 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_pci.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_pci.c
index a65705814b9a..f707e0a54295 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_pci.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_pci.c
@@ -44,9 +44,9 @@ KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM(pci_id, pciidlist, xe_pci_id_kunit_desc);
  *
  * Return: pointer to the next parameter or NULL if no more parameters
  */
-const void *xe_pci_graphics_ip_gen_param(const void *prev, char *desc)
+const void *xe_pci_graphics_ip_gen_param(struct kunit *test, const void *prev, char *desc)
 {
-	return graphics_ip_gen_params(prev, desc);
+	return graphics_ip_gen_params(test, prev, desc);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_IF_KUNIT(xe_pci_graphics_ip_gen_param);
 
@@ -61,9 +61,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_IF_KUNIT(xe_pci_graphics_ip_gen_param);
  *
  * Return: pointer to the next parameter or NULL if no more parameters
  */
-const void *xe_pci_media_ip_gen_param(const void *prev, char *desc)
+const void *xe_pci_media_ip_gen_param(struct kunit *test, const void *prev, char *desc)
 {
-	return media_ip_gen_params(prev, desc);
+	return media_ip_gen_params(test, prev, desc);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_IF_KUNIT(xe_pci_media_ip_gen_param);
 
@@ -78,9 +78,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_IF_KUNIT(xe_pci_media_ip_gen_param);
  *
  * Return: pointer to the next parameter or NULL if no more parameters
  */
-const void *xe_pci_id_gen_param(const void *prev, char *desc)
+const void *xe_pci_id_gen_param(struct kunit *test, const void *prev, char *desc)
 {
-	const struct pci_device_id *pci = pci_id_gen_params(prev, desc);
+	const struct pci_device_id *pci = pci_id_gen_params(test, prev, desc);
 
 	return pci->driver_data ? pci : NULL;
 }
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_pci_test.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_pci_test.h
index ce4d2b86b778..6d8bc56f7bde 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_pci_test.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_pci_test.h
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
 #define _XE_PCI_TEST_H_
 
 #include <linux/types.h>
+#include <kunit/test.h>
 
 #include "xe_platform_types.h"
 #include "xe_sriov_types.h"
@@ -25,9 +26,9 @@ struct xe_pci_fake_data {
 
 int xe_pci_fake_device_init(struct xe_device *xe);
 
-const void *xe_pci_graphics_ip_gen_param(const void *prev, char *desc);
-const void *xe_pci_media_ip_gen_param(const void *prev, char *desc);
-const void *xe_pci_id_gen_param(const void *prev, char *desc);
-const void *xe_pci_live_device_gen_param(const void *prev, char *desc);
+const void *xe_pci_graphics_ip_gen_param(struct kunit *test, const void *prev, char *desc);
+const void *xe_pci_media_ip_gen_param(struct kunit *test, const void *prev, char *desc);
+const void *xe_pci_id_gen_param(struct kunit *test, const void *prev, char *desc);
+const void *xe_pci_live_device_gen_param(struct kunit *test, const void *prev, char *desc);
 
 #endif
-- 
2.51.0.rc2.233.g662b1ed5c5-goog


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/2] kunit: Only output a test plan if we're using kunit_array_gen_params
  2025-08-21 13:54 [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/xe/tests: Fix some additional gen_params signatures David Gow
@ 2025-08-21 13:54 ` David Gow
  2025-08-21 20:17   ` Rae Moar
  2025-08-21 20:16 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/xe/tests: Fix some additional gen_params signatures Rae Moar
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: David Gow @ 2025-08-21 13:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rae Moar, Marie Zhussupova, marievictoria875, Rodrigo Vivi,
	Shuah Khan
  Cc: David Gow, Stephen Rothwell, Linux Next Mailing List, intel-xe,
	kunit-dev, linux-kselftest, linux-kernel

In 6a2a027e254b ("kunit: Enable direct registration of parameter arrays to a KUnit test"),
we now output a test plan for parameterised tests which use parameter
arrays. This uses the size of the array (via the ARRAY_SIZE macro) to
determine the number of subtests, which otherwise was indeterminate.

However some tests (particularly xe_pci.check_platform_gt_count) use
their own gen_params function which further filters the array, resulting
in the test plan being inaccurate (and hence kunit.py failing).

For now, only print the test plan line if the gen_params function is the
provided kunit_array_gen_params. Unfortunately, this catches a lot of
tests which would work, but at least makes sure we don't regress
anything until we can rework how some of these macros function.

Fixes: 6a2a027e254b ("kunit: Enable direct registration of parameter arrays to a KUnit test")
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
---

No changes since v1:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20250819073434.1411114-2-davidgow@google.com/

(The change was in patch 1.)

---
 lib/kunit/test.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/lib/kunit/test.c b/lib/kunit/test.c
index b661407ad0a3..bb66ea1a3eac 100644
--- a/lib/kunit/test.c
+++ b/lib/kunit/test.c
@@ -732,10 +732,12 @@ int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite)
 				  "KTAP version 1\n");
 			kunit_log(KERN_INFO, &test, KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT
 				  "# Subtest: %s", test_case->name);
-			if (test.params_array.params)
+			if (test.params_array.params &&
+			    test_case->generate_params == kunit_array_gen_params) {
 				kunit_log(KERN_INFO, &test, KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT
 					  KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT "1..%zd\n",
 					  test.params_array.num_params);
+			}
 
 			while (curr_param) {
 				struct kunit param_test = {
-- 
2.51.0.rc2.233.g662b1ed5c5-goog


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/xe/tests: Fix some additional gen_params signatures
  2025-08-21 13:54 [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/xe/tests: Fix some additional gen_params signatures David Gow
  2025-08-21 13:54 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] kunit: Only output a test plan if we're using kunit_array_gen_params David Gow
@ 2025-08-21 20:16 ` Rae Moar
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Rae Moar @ 2025-08-21 20:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Gow
  Cc: Marie Zhussupova, marievictoria875, Rodrigo Vivi, Shuah Khan,
	Stephen Rothwell, Linux Next Mailing List, intel-xe, kunit-dev,
	linux-kselftest, linux-kernel

On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 8:54 AM David Gow <davidgow@google.com> wrote:
>
> In 444be9072fca ("kunit: Pass parameterized test context to generate_params()")
> prototype used for gen_params functions was changed to add a struct
> kunit parameter. However, a few of these used in xe were not updated.
>
> Update these so that the xe_pci tests build and run again.
>
> Fixes: 444be9072fca ("kunit: Pass parameterized test context to generate_params()")
> Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
> ---
>
> Sorry, the last fix here caused a warning (thanks to the test robot for
> finding it).
>
> I'm still happy to sqash and re-send the whole original series if that's
> preferred.
>
> Changes since v1:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20250819073434.1411114-1-davidgow@google.com/
> - Add the missing <kunit/test.h> include for struct kunit
>

Hello!

Thanks for this change! It looks good to me!

Reviewed-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>

Thanks!
-Rae

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_pci.c      | 12 ++++++------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_pci_test.h |  9 +++++----
>  2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_pci.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_pci.c
> index a65705814b9a..f707e0a54295 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_pci.c
> @@ -44,9 +44,9 @@ KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM(pci_id, pciidlist, xe_pci_id_kunit_desc);
>   *
>   * Return: pointer to the next parameter or NULL if no more parameters
>   */
> -const void *xe_pci_graphics_ip_gen_param(const void *prev, char *desc)
> +const void *xe_pci_graphics_ip_gen_param(struct kunit *test, const void *prev, char *desc)
>  {
> -       return graphics_ip_gen_params(prev, desc);
> +       return graphics_ip_gen_params(test, prev, desc);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_IF_KUNIT(xe_pci_graphics_ip_gen_param);
>
> @@ -61,9 +61,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_IF_KUNIT(xe_pci_graphics_ip_gen_param);
>   *
>   * Return: pointer to the next parameter or NULL if no more parameters
>   */
> -const void *xe_pci_media_ip_gen_param(const void *prev, char *desc)
> +const void *xe_pci_media_ip_gen_param(struct kunit *test, const void *prev, char *desc)
>  {
> -       return media_ip_gen_params(prev, desc);
> +       return media_ip_gen_params(test, prev, desc);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_IF_KUNIT(xe_pci_media_ip_gen_param);
>
> @@ -78,9 +78,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_IF_KUNIT(xe_pci_media_ip_gen_param);
>   *
>   * Return: pointer to the next parameter or NULL if no more parameters
>   */
> -const void *xe_pci_id_gen_param(const void *prev, char *desc)
> +const void *xe_pci_id_gen_param(struct kunit *test, const void *prev, char *desc)
>  {
> -       const struct pci_device_id *pci = pci_id_gen_params(prev, desc);
> +       const struct pci_device_id *pci = pci_id_gen_params(test, prev, desc);
>
>         return pci->driver_data ? pci : NULL;
>  }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_pci_test.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_pci_test.h
> index ce4d2b86b778..6d8bc56f7bde 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_pci_test.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_pci_test.h
> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
>  #define _XE_PCI_TEST_H_
>
>  #include <linux/types.h>
> +#include <kunit/test.h>
>
>  #include "xe_platform_types.h"
>  #include "xe_sriov_types.h"
> @@ -25,9 +26,9 @@ struct xe_pci_fake_data {
>
>  int xe_pci_fake_device_init(struct xe_device *xe);
>
> -const void *xe_pci_graphics_ip_gen_param(const void *prev, char *desc);
> -const void *xe_pci_media_ip_gen_param(const void *prev, char *desc);
> -const void *xe_pci_id_gen_param(const void *prev, char *desc);
> -const void *xe_pci_live_device_gen_param(const void *prev, char *desc);
> +const void *xe_pci_graphics_ip_gen_param(struct kunit *test, const void *prev, char *desc);
> +const void *xe_pci_media_ip_gen_param(struct kunit *test, const void *prev, char *desc);
> +const void *xe_pci_id_gen_param(struct kunit *test, const void *prev, char *desc);
> +const void *xe_pci_live_device_gen_param(struct kunit *test, const void *prev, char *desc);
>
>  #endif
> --
> 2.51.0.rc2.233.g662b1ed5c5-goog
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] kunit: Only output a test plan if we're using kunit_array_gen_params
  2025-08-21 13:54 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] kunit: Only output a test plan if we're using kunit_array_gen_params David Gow
@ 2025-08-21 20:17   ` Rae Moar
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Rae Moar @ 2025-08-21 20:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Gow
  Cc: Marie Zhussupova, marievictoria875, Rodrigo Vivi, Shuah Khan,
	Stephen Rothwell, Linux Next Mailing List, intel-xe, kunit-dev,
	linux-kselftest, linux-kernel

On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 8:54 AM David Gow <davidgow@google.com> wrote:
>
> In 6a2a027e254b ("kunit: Enable direct registration of parameter arrays to a KUnit test"),
> we now output a test plan for parameterised tests which use parameter
> arrays. This uses the size of the array (via the ARRAY_SIZE macro) to
> determine the number of subtests, which otherwise was indeterminate.
>
> However some tests (particularly xe_pci.check_platform_gt_count) use
> their own gen_params function which further filters the array, resulting
> in the test plan being inaccurate (and hence kunit.py failing).
>
> For now, only print the test plan line if the gen_params function is the
> provided kunit_array_gen_params. Unfortunately, this catches a lot of
> tests which would work, but at least makes sure we don't regress
> anything until we can rework how some of these macros function.
>
> Fixes: 6a2a027e254b ("kunit: Enable direct registration of parameter arrays to a KUnit test")
> Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>


Hello!

This makes sense to me. Maybe we can work on this feature in the future. Thanks!

Reviewed-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>

Thanks!
-Rae

> ---
>
> No changes since v1:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20250819073434.1411114-2-davidgow@google.com/
>
> (The change was in patch 1.)
>
> ---
>  lib/kunit/test.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/kunit/test.c b/lib/kunit/test.c
> index b661407ad0a3..bb66ea1a3eac 100644
> --- a/lib/kunit/test.c
> +++ b/lib/kunit/test.c
> @@ -732,10 +732,12 @@ int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite)
>                                   "KTAP version 1\n");
>                         kunit_log(KERN_INFO, &test, KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT
>                                   "# Subtest: %s", test_case->name);
> -                       if (test.params_array.params)
> +                       if (test.params_array.params &&
> +                           test_case->generate_params == kunit_array_gen_params) {
>                                 kunit_log(KERN_INFO, &test, KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT
>                                           KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT "1..%zd\n",
>                                           test.params_array.num_params);
> +                       }
>
>                         while (curr_param) {
>                                 struct kunit param_test = {
> --
> 2.51.0.rc2.233.g662b1ed5c5-goog
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2025-08-21 20:17 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-08-21 13:54 [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/xe/tests: Fix some additional gen_params signatures David Gow
2025-08-21 13:54 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] kunit: Only output a test plan if we're using kunit_array_gen_params David Gow
2025-08-21 20:17   ` Rae Moar
2025-08-21 20:16 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/xe/tests: Fix some additional gen_params signatures Rae Moar

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).