From: Sagi Shahar <sagis@google.com>
To: Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>,
Ryan Afranji <afranji@google.com>,
Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>,
Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>,
Erdem Aktas <erdemaktas@google.com>,
Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
Roger Wang <runanwang@google.com>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
"Pratik R. Sampat" <pratikrajesh.sampat@amd.com>,
Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>, Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>,
Chenyi Qiang <chenyi.qiang@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 04/19] KVM: selftests: Expose function to allocate guest vCPU stack
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2025 11:00:19 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAhR5DG8EFds6GrMkv3YL0M8J1BuyzoXF9ZZn1YHFJ8arhyYLA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9ef0d1f4-3257-4821-8241-aedae0957c6a@linux.intel.com>
On Tue, Aug 26, 2025 at 12:39 AM Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 8/21/2025 12:28 PM, Sagi Shahar wrote:
> > TDX guests' registers cannot be initialized directly using
> > vcpu_regs_set(), hence the stack pointer needs to be initialized by
> > the guest itself, running boot code beginning at the reset vector.
> >
> > Expose the function to allocate the guest stack so that TDX
> > initialization code can allocate it itself and skip the allocation in
> > vm_arch_vcpu_add() in that case.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sagi Shahar <sagis@google.com>
> > ---
> > .../selftests/kvm/include/x86/processor.h | 2 ++
> > tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86/processor.c | 17 ++++++++++++-----
> > 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86/processor.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86/processor.h
> > index 5c16507f9b2d..8fcc5118683e 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86/processor.h
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86/processor.h
> > @@ -1111,6 +1111,8 @@ static inline void vcpu_clear_cpuid_feature(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> > vcpu_set_or_clear_cpuid_feature(vcpu, feature, false);
> > }
> >
> > +vm_vaddr_t kvm_allocate_vcpu_stack(struct kvm_vm *vm);
> > +
> > uint64_t vcpu_get_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, uint64_t msr_index);
> > int _vcpu_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, uint64_t msr_index, uint64_t msr_value);
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86/processor.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86/processor.c
> > index b2a4b11ac8c0..1eae92957456 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86/processor.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86/processor.c
> > @@ -687,12 +687,9 @@ void vcpu_arch_set_entry_point(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, void *guest_code)
> > vcpu_regs_set(vcpu, ®s);
> > }
> >
> > -struct kvm_vcpu *vm_arch_vcpu_add(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t vcpu_id)
> > +vm_vaddr_t kvm_allocate_vcpu_stack(struct kvm_vm *vm)
> > {
> > - struct kvm_mp_state mp_state;
> > - struct kvm_regs regs;
> > vm_vaddr_t stack_vaddr;
> > - struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
> >
> > stack_vaddr = __vm_vaddr_alloc(vm, DEFAULT_STACK_PGS * getpagesize(),
> > DEFAULT_GUEST_STACK_VADDR_MIN,
> > @@ -713,6 +710,15 @@ struct kvm_vcpu *vm_arch_vcpu_add(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t vcpu_id)
> > "__vm_vaddr_alloc() did not provide a page-aligned address");
> > stack_vaddr -= 8;
> >
> > + return stack_vaddr;
> > +}
> > +
> > +struct kvm_vcpu *vm_arch_vcpu_add(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t vcpu_id)
> > +{
> > + struct kvm_mp_state mp_state;
> > + struct kvm_regs regs;
> > + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
> > +
> > vcpu = __vm_vcpu_add(vm, vcpu_id);
> > vcpu_init_cpuid(vcpu, kvm_get_supported_cpuid());
> > vcpu_init_sregs(vm, vcpu);
> > @@ -721,7 +727,8 @@ struct kvm_vcpu *vm_arch_vcpu_add(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t vcpu_id)
> > /* Setup guest general purpose registers */
> > vcpu_regs_get(vcpu, ®s);
> > regs.rflags = regs.rflags | 0x2;
> > - regs.rsp = stack_vaddr;
> > + if (vm->type != KVM_X86_TDX_VM)
> > + regs.rsp = kvm_allocate_vcpu_stack(vm);
>
> I am wondering if this could be more generic.
> I.e, make vcpu_regs_get() return the error code.
> If vcpu_regs_get() failed (for TDX, since it's guest state is protected, the
> ioctl will return -EINVAL), the vcpu_regs_set(), including the allocation for
> the vcpu stack, could be skipped.
>
I'm dropping this check and only keeping the check from "KVM:
selftests: Hook TDX support to vm and vcpu creation" which looks like
this:
if (is_tdx_vm(vm)) {
vm_tdx_vcpu_add(vm, vcpu);
} else {
vcpu_init_cpuid(vcpu, kvm_get_supported_cpuid());
vcpu_init_sregs(vm, vcpu);
vcpu_init_xcrs(vm, vcpu);
/* Setup guest general purpose registers */
vcpu_regs_get(vcpu, ®s);
regs.rflags = regs.rflags | 0x2;
regs.rsp = kvm_allocate_vcpu_stack(vm);
vcpu_regs_set(vcpu, ®s);
}
Since there are other differences specific to TDX I think this is
cleaner than trying to handle kvm_allocate_vcpu_stack() individually.
> > vcpu_regs_set(vcpu, ®s);
> >
> > /* Setup the MP state */
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-26 16:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-21 4:28 [PATCH v9 00/19] TDX KVM selftests Sagi Shahar
2025-08-21 4:28 ` [PATCH v9 01/19] KVM: selftests: Include overflow.h instead of redefining is_signed_type() Sagi Shahar
2025-08-21 14:16 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-08-21 14:37 ` Ira Weiny
2025-08-21 14:42 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-08-21 4:28 ` [PATCH v9 02/19] KVM: selftests: Allocate pgd in virt_map() as necessary Sagi Shahar
2025-08-21 14:45 ` Ira Weiny
2025-08-26 2:36 ` Binbin Wu
2025-08-21 4:28 ` [PATCH v9 03/19] KVM: selftests: Expose functions to get default sregs values Sagi Shahar
2025-08-26 2:36 ` Binbin Wu
2025-08-26 14:05 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-08-21 4:28 ` [PATCH v9 04/19] KVM: selftests: Expose function to allocate guest vCPU stack Sagi Shahar
2025-08-21 22:00 ` Ira Weiny
2025-08-21 22:24 ` Sagi Shahar
2025-08-26 5:39 ` Binbin Wu
2025-08-26 16:00 ` Sagi Shahar [this message]
2025-08-26 17:16 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-08-21 4:28 ` [PATCH v9 05/19] KVM: selftests: Update kvm_init_vm_address_properties() for TDX Sagi Shahar
2025-08-21 22:05 ` Ira Weiny
2025-08-21 22:30 ` Sagi Shahar
2025-08-26 5:51 ` Binbin Wu
2025-08-26 16:04 ` Sagi Shahar
2025-08-21 4:28 ` [PATCH v9 06/19] KVM: selftests: Expose segment definitons to assembly files Sagi Shahar
2025-08-21 20:04 ` Ira Weiny
2025-08-21 4:29 ` [PATCH v9 07/19] KVM: selftests: Add kbuild definitons Sagi Shahar
2025-08-21 4:29 ` [PATCH v9 08/19] KVM: selftests: Define structs to pass parameters to TDX boot code Sagi Shahar
2025-08-26 6:52 ` Binbin Wu
2025-08-26 16:10 ` Sagi Shahar
2025-08-21 4:29 ` [PATCH v9 09/19] KVM: selftests: Add " Sagi Shahar
2025-08-21 4:29 ` [PATCH v9 10/19] KVM: selftests: Set up TDX boot code region Sagi Shahar
2025-08-25 5:32 ` Yan Zhao
2025-08-26 16:38 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-08-27 1:36 ` Yan Zhao
2025-08-21 4:29 ` [PATCH v9 11/19] KVM: selftests: Set up TDX boot parameters region Sagi Shahar
2025-08-26 8:36 ` Binbin Wu
2025-08-26 16:17 ` Sagi Shahar
2025-08-21 4:29 ` [PATCH v9 12/19] KVM: selftests: Add helper to initialize TDX VM Sagi Shahar
2025-08-21 4:29 ` [PATCH v9 13/19] KVM: selftests: TDX: Use KVM_TDX_CAPABILITIES to validate TDs' attribute configuration Sagi Shahar
2025-08-26 9:22 ` Binbin Wu
2025-08-21 4:29 ` [PATCH v9 14/19] KVM: selftests: Add helpers to init TDX memory and finalize VM Sagi Shahar
2025-08-25 8:40 ` Yan Zhao
2025-08-25 19:02 ` Sagi Shahar
2025-08-26 1:07 ` Yan Zhao
2025-08-27 2:24 ` Binbin Wu
2025-08-27 2:44 ` Yan Zhao
2025-08-27 3:52 ` Yan Zhao
2025-08-21 4:29 ` [PATCH v9 15/19] KVM: selftests: Hook TDX support to vm and vcpu creation Sagi Shahar
2025-08-26 8:28 ` Chenyi Qiang
2025-08-26 16:12 ` Sagi Shahar
2025-08-26 17:31 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-08-26 20:16 ` Ira Weiny
2025-08-26 20:29 ` Sagi Shahar
2025-08-26 20:30 ` Sagi Shahar
2025-08-26 21:31 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-08-26 21:38 ` Sagi Shahar
2025-08-21 4:29 ` [PATCH v9 16/19] KVM: selftests: Add support for TDX TDCALL from guest Sagi Shahar
2025-08-21 4:29 ` [PATCH v9 17/19] KVM: selftests: Add wrapper for TDX MMIO " Sagi Shahar
2025-08-21 4:29 ` [PATCH v9 18/19] KVM: selftests: Add ucall support for TDX Sagi Shahar
2025-08-27 7:18 ` Binbin Wu
2025-09-02 15:45 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-09-03 1:07 ` Binbin Wu
2025-08-21 4:29 ` [PATCH v9 19/19] KVM: selftests: Add TDX lifecycle test Sagi Shahar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAAhR5DG8EFds6GrMkv3YL0M8J1BuyzoXF9ZZn1YHFJ8arhyYLA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=sagis@google.com \
--cc=ackerleytng@google.com \
--cc=afranji@google.com \
--cc=ajones@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=binbin.wu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chao.gao@intel.com \
--cc=chenyi.qiang@intel.com \
--cc=erdemaktas@google.com \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=isaku.yamahata@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=pratikrajesh.sampat@amd.com \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
--cc=runanwang@google.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).