From: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
To: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Cc: Marie Zhussupova <marievic@google.com>,
rmoar@google.com, shuah@kernel.org, brendan.higgins@linux.dev,
dvyukov@google.com, lucas.demarchi@intel.com,
thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com, rodrigo.vivi@intel.com,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com,
kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] kcsan: test: Update parameter generator to new signature
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2025 13:11:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANpmjNMkcZaZ_dbXdd40dHrD3Wo2muv14ojmz4diwLG68LiFyQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABVgOSnmtcjarGuZog9zKNvt9rYD2Tsox3ngVgh4pJUFMF737w@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, 2 Aug 2025 at 11:45, David Gow <davidgow@google.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 30 Jul 2025 at 03:37, Marie Zhussupova <marievic@google.com> wrote:
> >
> > This patch modifies `nthreads_gen_params` in kcsan_test.c
> > to accept an additional `struct kunit *test` argument.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Marie Zhussupova <marievic@google.com>
> > ---
>
> This is a pretty straightforward fix after patch 3. KCSAN folks, would
> you prefer this kept as a separate patch, or squashed into the
> previous one (so there's no commit where this is broken)?
Normally patch series should be structured so that bisection does not
break. Having this fixup as a separate patch means that bisections
where the KCSAN test is enabled will break.
This is a tiny change, so I'd just squash it.
> Either way,
> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
>
>
> -- David
>
> > kernel/kcsan/kcsan_test.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/kcsan/kcsan_test.c b/kernel/kcsan/kcsan_test.c
> > index c2871180edcc..fc76648525ac 100644
> > --- a/kernel/kcsan/kcsan_test.c
> > +++ b/kernel/kcsan/kcsan_test.c
> > @@ -1383,7 +1383,7 @@ static void test_atomic_builtins_missing_barrier(struct kunit *test)
> > * The thread counts are chosen to cover potentially interesting boundaries and
> > * corner cases (2 to 5), and then stress the system with larger counts.
> > */
> > -static const void *nthreads_gen_params(const void *prev, char *desc)
> > +static const void *nthreads_gen_params(struct kunit *test, const void *prev, char *desc)
> > {
> > long nthreads = (long)prev;
> >
> > --
> > 2.50.1.552.g942d659e1b-goog
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-07 11:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-29 19:36 [PATCH 0/9] kunit: Refactor and extend KUnit's Marie Zhussupova
2025-07-29 19:36 ` [PATCH 1/9] kunit: Add parent kunit for parameterized test context Marie Zhussupova
2025-08-02 9:44 ` David Gow
2025-08-05 15:17 ` Rae Moar
2025-08-08 12:20 ` Marie Zhussupova
2025-07-29 19:36 ` [PATCH 2/9] kunit: Introduce param_init/exit for parameterized test shared context management Marie Zhussupova
2025-07-30 13:50 ` kernel test robot
2025-08-02 9:44 ` David Gow
2025-08-05 15:17 ` Rae Moar
2025-08-08 13:01 ` Marie Zhussupova
2025-07-29 19:36 ` [PATCH 3/9] kunit: Pass additional context to generate_params for parameterized testing Marie Zhussupova
2025-07-30 14:32 ` kernel test robot
2025-08-02 9:44 ` David Gow
2025-08-05 15:18 ` Rae Moar
2025-07-29 19:36 ` [PATCH 4/9] kcsan: test: Update parameter generator to new signature Marie Zhussupova
2025-08-02 9:44 ` David Gow
2025-08-07 11:11 ` Marco Elver [this message]
2025-07-29 19:36 ` [PATCH 5/9] drm/xe: " Marie Zhussupova
2025-08-02 9:44 ` David Gow
2025-08-07 10:59 ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-07-29 19:36 ` [PATCH 6/9] kunit: Enable direct registration of parameter arrays to a KUnit test Marie Zhussupova
2025-07-29 20:14 ` Rae Moar
2025-07-29 20:26 ` Rae Moar
2025-07-31 15:58 ` Dan Carpenter
2025-07-31 20:01 ` Marie Zhussupova
2025-08-02 9:44 ` David Gow
2025-08-05 15:18 ` Rae Moar
2025-08-08 1:22 ` Marie Zhussupova
2025-07-29 19:36 ` [PATCH 7/9] kunit: Add example parameterized test with shared resources and direct static parameter array setup Marie Zhussupova
2025-07-30 12:25 ` kernel test robot
2025-08-02 9:44 ` David Gow
2025-08-06 17:50 ` Marie Zhussupova
2025-08-05 15:19 ` Rae Moar
2025-07-29 19:36 ` [PATCH 8/9] kunit: Add example parameterized test with direct dynamic " Marie Zhussupova
2025-08-02 9:44 ` David Gow
2025-08-05 15:19 ` Rae Moar
2025-07-29 19:36 ` [PATCH 9/9] Documentation: kunit: Document new parameterized test features Marie Zhussupova
2025-08-02 9:45 ` David Gow
2025-08-08 13:02 ` Marie Zhussupova
2025-08-05 15:19 ` Rae Moar
2025-08-08 13:05 ` Marie Zhussupova
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CANpmjNMkcZaZ_dbXdd40dHrD3Wo2muv14ojmz4diwLG68LiFyQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=elver@google.com \
--cc=brendan.higgins@linux.dev \
--cc=davidgow@google.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=marievic@google.com \
--cc=rmoar@google.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).