From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wr1-f43.google.com (mail-wr1-f43.google.com [209.85.221.43]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A837B29712F for ; Fri, 23 May 2025 16:27:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.221.43 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1748017633; cv=none; b=DXZfmxU75FmyQHZqwRsWgdh6d7xkq5xqnTu0fSACIN0Iu9SxFBkrbUehtZoWBBqIE61A8Hs2B8ndCEdi78sFYszQzVoWWBqnWLKv/snRXW3dTkh1PlNC7c25XZlHIzWY+JF8XXPCA1YZxY6a2caCvRtwN+1AQFBQJt+WD3Qrc+s= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1748017633; c=relaxed/simple; bh=xoy2iHNo1joT7Vza5E4ulrB5ALTkKGuwFJzZh05QFXY=; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Subject:Cc:To:From: References:In-Reply-To; b=j1xgKUkhJbIsNOu/Vhjqahabm2CFsAluRlQ3POOku1KUoTLIWnJdoG6oRWa3bTTH2iF8S3bMkwDq5ET60ITAyMETgfapiz17+xeF15WUB/KR/dR3SrF192vF7M3z8vbTd6JfCLs7qTHOMpxEPiK74P0J7VW/4q0RRpkH+bRjf9I= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ventanamicro.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ventanamicro.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ventanamicro.com header.i=@ventanamicro.com header.b=YWVho5t0; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.221.43 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ventanamicro.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ventanamicro.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ventanamicro.com header.i=@ventanamicro.com header.b="YWVho5t0" Received: by mail-wr1-f43.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-3a374754e03so15185f8f.1 for ; Fri, 23 May 2025 09:27:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ventanamicro.com; s=google; t=1748017628; x=1748622428; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:references:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:date :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=Ia6puvfZPG5fMJM1ZRtmeD9phh8ksFStnHEcrbqR9QM=; b=YWVho5t00wvenZuAzoFsjd+SDYyEJKBKLddYH1sizwOm6UT4z3PLA+rgnyNaTcoNWY ivS2MCzrHRq9yzMIG4GiOV5tfNJrpVcRRNU3uFKdvwid2zy0LRznIFvCMYlMXSsya+r+ G2H1sQ+6JiML5gGBxo6avtIDrJc+xO0KuS5aJaJ52FslLlHm2YGRZftDYhgDOzvERsEB FlI5XrWoq0+HDRHs7wvgWSt8geb5p0uUl/ntjExeO5ZUwG/JB+T/zPVsjf5VsDde1z7i AbnfTu8soC+Eb2DMd18QwSUKo8DbVYnIdhiugDfbf9O6Qg9NEUAW4F1FhHsHRPvgil8U IWJQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1748017628; x=1748622428; h=in-reply-to:references:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:date :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Ia6puvfZPG5fMJM1ZRtmeD9phh8ksFStnHEcrbqR9QM=; b=fNPdiT1IsBac59UCcZX2n0rkGLAXgcq10CP8t7d6lSLXHKjkISzfHxIjFuRNvqYQrU n6YNSW5JJ1cKs4MD8GKgHiLoeAoMPa/i4nXenSuRLpxAxq3zuHb8XWxiemyzI8F3IWFD 6Zr/4pGsE1BSULjZE0708AUsTPbzk+Ug22+RlnwVs2Q015oZzPjWnDXbtWZd7lOXupRK c/LNGCJt4xEmjXWZ1IQu1r9iUyMutQXT2MCZclO2AILL98T03JCyVoU2vgwr8qpi9Zp7 YCIV+hZgJSxyR+fk8rDg0IVrgZ9QqhaNEyCxlVrNJfsa+XJPdoyUK/K31NYxNFRnhEZL geTQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXhqMlIxuLchcUwBW5stXnsmTSin4e8gRQGsOPzTu0cB9nilnBaqH88wbE1gooh0CgYZjyVTpIC0lxJt+2cVDQ=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwOh/NnUuiFMkDJf20K+vTpGZu55ILFqiB4zDkVjpeLC6kD40bY q0Rb0gZRuVNmFlNo7bbI57qz4pu3O43fU/zV5lZFZsSlYdMaRQJJ8k0fg4ebBBcU00I= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvYv0HBwve42HKxzuvl37CxGSPkGWherXWD+PLIQCtB4iDPa6Fk9aqjXX8tdtu ICPAdQvRXVZfikeTgYF/IjavN0naaR89pJlKrN9+vEtEZBpNgQsxlaI3dBTXl0JuP9CZ8znOclb HeNKGkbhBnlo0ohkdzpICdebRhG+cQFDVaDMP9sUm97uamBOpgI7Emb5gh5k6SVqfnfeD3GyPb0 ipZHcHa++psN1He0+o3tL5l2OCamICq7UW9MwKFY6hvc786U5DYVvCMc707gSMzBSmZe+PKM4EN KczCS56DBTGWpNM5yeJ+B00vr3SPs+3TcsYJL1DYD19CYt7iz0k3tgoKr7wSNIKCPcG8Ig== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGu5SqOXXJDnZhsvGxzP9Q90JnNNFmT1bVPxtvjIRaUq9pqy0zhm7LZZhwBJv3AkH7nFc+56w== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:230e:b0:3a4:bafb:adaa with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-3a4c2b3b3d4mr1273822f8f.3.1748017627898; Fri, 23 May 2025 09:27:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2a02:8308:a00c:e200:be84:d9ad:e5e6:f60b]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-3a368250dbbsm22377027f8f.47.2025.05.23.09.27.07 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 23 May 2025 09:27:07 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Fri, 23 May 2025 18:27:07 +0200 Message-Id: Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 13/14] RISC-V: KVM: add support for FWFT SBI extension Cc: "Samuel Holland" , "Andrew Jones" , "Deepak Gupta" , "Charlie Jenkins" , "Atish Patra" , "linux-riscv" To: =?utf-8?q?Cl=C3=A9ment_L=C3=A9ger?= , "Paul Walmsley" , "Palmer Dabbelt" , "Anup Patel" , "Atish Patra" , "Shuah Khan" , "Jonathan Corbet" , , , , , , From: =?utf-8?q?Radim_Kr=C4=8Dm=C3=A1=C5=99?= References: <20250523101932.1594077-1-cleger@rivosinc.com> <20250523101932.1594077-14-cleger@rivosinc.com> <9f9e2869-725d-4590-887a-9b0ef091472e@rivosinc.com> In-Reply-To: <9f9e2869-725d-4590-887a-9b0ef091472e@rivosinc.com> 2025-05-23T17:29:49+02:00, Cl=C3=A9ment L=C3=A9ger : > On 23/05/2025 15:05, Radim Kr=C4=8Dm=C3=A1=C5=99 wrote: >> 2025-05-23T12:19:30+02:00, Cl=C3=A9ment L=C3=A9ger = : >>> +++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_fwft.c >>> +static const enum sbi_fwft_feature_t kvm_fwft_defined_features[] =3D { >>> + SBI_FWFT_MISALIGNED_EXC_DELEG, >>> + SBI_FWFT_LANDING_PAD, >>> + SBI_FWFT_SHADOW_STACK, >>> + SBI_FWFT_DOUBLE_TRAP, >>> + SBI_FWFT_PTE_AD_HW_UPDATING, >>> + SBI_FWFT_POINTER_MASKING_PMLEN, >>> +}; >>=20 >> How will userspace control which subset of these features is allowed in >> the guest? >>=20 >> (We can reuse the KVM SBI extension interface if we don't want to add a >> FWFT specific ONE_REG.) > > Hi Radim, > > I didn't looked at that part. But most likely using the kvm one reg > interface seems ok like what is done for STA ? We could have per feature > override with one reg per feature. Sounds fine. > Is this something blocking though ? We'd like to merge FWFT once SBI 3.0 > is ratified so that would be nice not delaying it too much. I'll take a > look at it to see if it isn't too long to implement. Not blocking, but I would at least default FWFT to disabled, because current userspace cannot handle [14/14]. (Well... save/restore was probably broken even before, but let's try to not make it worse. :]) Thanks.