public inbox for linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Emil Tsalapatis" <emil@etsalapatis.com>
To: "Chengkaitao" <pilgrimtao@gmail.com>, <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
	<ast@kernel.org>, <daniel@iogearbox.net>, <andrii@kernel.org>,
	<eddyz87@gmail.com>, <song@kernel.org>, <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
	<john.fastabend@gmail.com>, <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
	<sdf@fomichev.me>, <haoluo@google.com>, <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	<shuah@kernel.org>, <chengkaitao@kylinos.cn>,
	<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v8 4/8] bpf: refactor __bpf_list_add to take insertion point via **prev_ptr
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2026 19:23:31 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DH8UIK9AQRV0.KZTEGI7CK0AV@etsalapatis.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260316112843.78657-5-pilgrimtao@gmail.com>

On Mon Mar 16, 2026 at 7:28 AM EDT, Chengkaitao wrote:
> From: Kaitao Cheng <chengkaitao@kylinos.cn>
>
> Refactor __bpf_list_add to accept (new, head, struct list_head **prev_ptr,
> ..) instead of (node, head, bool tail, ..). Load prev from *prev_ptr after
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(h), so we never dereference an uninitialized h->prev when
> head was 0-initialized (e.g. push_back passes &h->prev).
>
> When prev is not the list head, validate that prev is in the list via
> its owner.
>
> Prepares for bpf_list_add_impl(head, new, prev, ..) to insert after a
> given list node.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kaitao Cheng <chengkaitao@kylinos.cn>
> ---
>  kernel/bpf/helpers.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
> index dac346eb1e2f..a9665f97b3bc 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
> @@ -2379,11 +2379,13 @@ __bpf_kfunc void *bpf_refcount_acquire_impl(void *p__refcounted_kptr, void *meta
>  	return (void *)p__refcounted_kptr;
>  }
>  
> -static int __bpf_list_add(struct bpf_list_node_kern *node,
> +static int __bpf_list_add(struct bpf_list_node_kern *new,
>  			  struct bpf_list_head *head,
> -			  bool tail, struct btf_record *rec, u64 off)
> +			  struct list_head **prev_ptr,
> +			  struct btf_record *rec, u64 off)
>  {
> -	struct list_head *n = &node->list_head, *h = (void *)head;
> +	struct list_head *n = &new->list_head, *h = (void *)head;
> +	struct list_head *prev;
>  
>  	/* If list_head was 0-initialized by map, bpf_obj_init_field wasn't
>  	 * called on its fields, so init here
> @@ -2391,39 +2393,49 @@ static int __bpf_list_add(struct bpf_list_node_kern *node,
>  	if (unlikely(!h->next))
>  		INIT_LIST_HEAD(h);
>  
> -	/* node->owner != NULL implies !list_empty(n), no need to separately
> +	prev = *prev_ptr;
> +
> +	/* When prev is not the list head, it must be a node in this list. */
> +	if (prev != h && WARN_ON_ONCE(READ_ONCE(container_of(
> +	    prev, struct bpf_list_node_kern, list_head)->owner) != head))
> +		goto fail;
> +

This is pretty difficult to read, can you clean this up?

> +	/* new->owner != NULL implies !list_empty(n), no need to separately
>  	 * check the latter
>  	 */
> -	if (cmpxchg(&node->owner, NULL, BPF_PTR_POISON)) {
> -		/* Only called from BPF prog, no need to migrate_disable */
> -		__bpf_obj_drop_impl((void *)n - off, rec, false);
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -	}
> -
> -	tail ? list_add_tail(n, h) : list_add(n, h);
> -	WRITE_ONCE(node->owner, head);
> +	if (cmpxchg(&new->owner, NULL, BPF_PTR_POISON))
> +		goto fail;
>  
> +	list_add(n, prev);
> +	WRITE_ONCE(new->owner, head);
>  	return 0;
> +
> +fail:
> +	/* Only called from BPF prog, no need to migrate_disable */
> +	__bpf_obj_drop_impl((void *)n - off, rec, false);
> +	return -EINVAL;
>  }
>  
>  __bpf_kfunc int bpf_list_push_front_impl(struct bpf_list_head *head,
>  					 struct bpf_list_node *node,
>  					 void *meta__ign, u64 off)
>  {
> -	struct bpf_list_node_kern *n = (void *)node;
> +	struct bpf_list_node_kern *new = (void *)node;

I don't think this rename or the one in __bpf_list_add are useful, they
also kind of obfuscate the point of the patch by accident imo.

>  	struct btf_struct_meta *meta = meta__ign;
> +	struct list_head *h = (void *)head;
>  
> -	return __bpf_list_add(n, head, false, meta ? meta->record : NULL, off);
> +	return __bpf_list_add(new, head, &h, meta ? meta->record : NULL, off);
>  }
>  
>  __bpf_kfunc int bpf_list_push_back_impl(struct bpf_list_head *head,
>  					struct bpf_list_node *node,
>  					void *meta__ign, u64 off)
>  {
> -	struct bpf_list_node_kern *n = (void *)node;
> +	struct bpf_list_node_kern *new = (void *)node;
>  	struct btf_struct_meta *meta = meta__ign;
> +	struct list_head *h = (void *)head;
>  
> -	return __bpf_list_add(n, head, true, meta ? meta->record : NULL, off);
> +	return __bpf_list_add(new, head, &h->prev, meta ? meta->record : NULL, off);
>  }
>  
>  static struct bpf_list_node *__bpf_list_del(struct bpf_list_head *head,


  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-21 23:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-16 11:28 [PATCH bpf-next v8 0/8] bpf: Extend the bpf_list family of APIs Chengkaitao
2026-03-16 11:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 1/8] bpf: refactor kfunc checks using table-driven approach in verifier Chengkaitao
2026-03-19 15:39   ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-03-16 11:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 2/8] bpf: refactor __bpf_list_del to take list node pointer Chengkaitao
2026-03-19 16:17   ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-03-16 11:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 3/8] bpf: Introduce the bpf_list_del kfunc Chengkaitao
2026-03-16 12:10   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-03-21  2:45   ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-03-16 11:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 4/8] bpf: refactor __bpf_list_add to take insertion point via **prev_ptr Chengkaitao
2026-03-21 23:23   ` Emil Tsalapatis [this message]
2026-03-16 11:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 5/8] bpf: Add bpf_list_add_impl to insert node after a given list node Chengkaitao
2026-03-22  0:45   ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-03-16 11:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 6/8] bpf: allow bpf_list_front/back result as the prev argument of bpf_list_add_impl Chengkaitao
2026-03-16 14:29   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-03-16 11:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 7/8] bpf: add bpf_list_is_first/last/empty kfuncs Chengkaitao
2026-03-22  1:01   ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-03-22  1:20     ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-03-16 11:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 8/8] selftests/bpf: Add test cases for bpf_list_del/add/is_first/is_last/empty Chengkaitao
2026-03-19 16:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 0/8] bpf: Extend the bpf_list family of APIs Emil Tsalapatis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DH8UIK9AQRV0.KZTEGI7CK0AV@etsalapatis.com \
    --to=emil@etsalapatis.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=chengkaitao@kylinos.cn \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=pilgrimtao@gmail.com \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox