Linux Kernel Selftest development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>
To: "Bartosz Golaszewski" <bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	"Dmitry Torokhov" <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
	"Brendan Higgins" <brendan.higgins@linux.dev>,
	"David Gow" <david@davidgow.net>,
	"Rae Moar" <raemoar63@gmail.com>,
	"Andy Shevchenko" <andy@kernel.org>,
	"Maximilian Luz" <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>,
	"Hans de Goede" <hansg@kernel.org>,
	"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>,
	"Matthew Brost" <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
	"Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
	"Rodrigo Vivi" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	"David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
	"Simona Vetter" <simona@ffwll.ch>,
	brgl@kernel.org, driver-core@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
	intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/7] drm/xe/i2c: use platform_device_add_software_node()
Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 18:24:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DIGU67TAWF7W.1DWZMO4XAVK7G@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260512-swnode-remove-on-dev-unreg-v5-4-0035eff63812@oss.qualcomm.com>

On Tue May 12, 2026 at 1:59 PM CEST, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_i2c.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_i2c.c
> index 706783863d07d66b4685005d6649b3cd143ecc3b..7f4295e7dc74f112abff8427485b5c8a5ad71383 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_i2c.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_i2c.c
> @@ -53,6 +53,10 @@ static const struct property_entry xe_i2c_adapter_properties[] = {
>  	{ }
>  };
>  
> +static const struct software_node xe_i2c_adapter_swnode = {
> +	.properties = xe_i2c_adapter_properties,
> +};
> +
>  static inline void xe_i2c_read_endpoint(struct xe_mmio *mmio, void *ep)
>  {
>  	u32 *val = ep;
> @@ -96,10 +100,6 @@ static int xe_i2c_register_adapter(struct xe_i2c *i2c)
>  	struct fwnode_handle *fwnode;
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	fwnode = fwnode_create_software_node(xe_i2c_adapter_properties, NULL);
> -	if (IS_ERR(fwnode))
> -		return PTR_ERR(fwnode);
> -
>  	/*
>  	 * Not using platform_device_register_full() here because we don't have
>  	 * a handle to the platform_device before it returns. xe_i2c_notifier()
> @@ -107,10 +107,12 @@ static int xe_i2c_register_adapter(struct xe_i2c *i2c)
>  	 * platform_device_register_full() is done.
>  	 */
>  	pdev = platform_device_alloc(adapter_name, pci_dev_id(pci));
> -	if (!pdev) {
> -		ret = -ENOMEM;
> -		goto err_fwnode_remove;
> -	}
> +	if (!pdev)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	ret = platform_device_add_software_node(pdev, &xe_i2c_adapter_swnode);

By calling platform_device_add_software_node() the platform device technically
takes ownership of the struct software_node managing its lifetime, by removing
it in release().

However, this is not properly reflected by the
platform_device_add_software_node() API, as it just stores the pointer given by
the driver, which in this case is a pointer to module memory.

The platform device is reference counted and can outlive the module.

So, I think analogous to platform_device_add_data() we need to make a copy of
the struct software_node in platform_device_add_software_node().

> +	if (ret)
> +		goto err_pdev_put;
>  
>  	if (i2c->adapter_irq) {
>  		struct resource res;
> @@ -123,7 +125,6 @@ static int xe_i2c_register_adapter(struct xe_i2c *i2c)
>  	}
>  
>  	pdev->dev.parent = i2c->drm_dev;
> -	pdev->dev.fwnode = fwnode;
>  	i2c->adapter_node = fwnode;
>  	i2c->pdev = pdev;
>  
> @@ -135,8 +136,6 @@ static int xe_i2c_register_adapter(struct xe_i2c *i2c)
>  
>  err_pdev_put:
>  	platform_device_put(pdev);
> -err_fwnode_remove:
> -	fwnode_remove_software_node(fwnode);

There is another call to this in  xe_i2c_unregister_adapter(), which I think was
missed.

  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-12 16:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-12 11:59 [PATCH v5 0/7] driver core: remove software node from platform devices on device release Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-05-12 11:59 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] platform/surface: gpe: use platform_device_register_full() Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-05-12 11:59 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] driver core: platform: make the swnode check stricter Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-05-12 11:59 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] driver core: platform: provide platform_device_add_software_node() Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-05-12 16:31   ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-05-12 18:15     ` Dmitry Torokhov
2026-05-12 11:59 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] drm/xe/i2c: use platform_device_add_software_node() Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-05-12 16:24   ` Danilo Krummrich [this message]
2026-05-12 11:59 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] driver core: platform: remove software node on release() Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-05-12 11:59 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] kunit: provide kunit_software_node_register() Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-05-12 15:28   ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-05-12 11:59 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] driver core: platform: tests: add test cases for correct swnode removal Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-05-12 15:07 ` [PATCH v5 0/7] driver core: remove software node from platform devices on device release Danilo Krummrich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DIGU67TAWF7W.1DWZMO4XAVK7G@kernel.org \
    --to=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=andy@kernel.org \
    --cc=bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=brendan.higgins@linux.dev \
    --cc=brgl@kernel.org \
    --cc=david@davidgow.net \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=driver-core@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hansg@kernel.org \
    --cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luzmaximilian@gmail.com \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=raemoar63@gmail.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox