Linux Kernel Selftest development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Alexis Lothoré" <alexis.lothore@bootlin.com>
To: <bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org>, <alexis.lothore@bootlin.com>,
	<ast@kernel.org>, <daniel@iogearbox.net>, <andrii@kernel.org>,
	<martin.lau@linux.dev>, <eddyz87@gmail.com>, <memxor@gmail.com>,
	<song@kernel.org>, <yonghong.song@linux.dev>, <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	<john.fastabend@gmail.com>, <tglx@kernel.org>, <mingo@redhat.com>,
	<bp@alien8.de>, <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, <x86@kernel.org>,
	<hpa@zytor.com>, <shuah@kernel.org>, <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
	<alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>, <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>
Cc: <ebpf@linuxfoundation.org>, <bastien.curutchet@bootlin.com>,
	<thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>, <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <martin.lau@kernel.org>,
	<clm@meta.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/8] bpf: add BPF_JIT_KASAN for KASAN instrumentation of JITed programs
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2026 10:47:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DJ4DZHRVAV59.SPVM2QDQN0C@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1e7ab52954b9ff584d6871c2ec234a7155b577f29128564d0d597809cafad826@mail.kernel.org>

On Thu Jun 4, 2026 at 11:13 PM CEST, bot+bpf-ci wrote:
>> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/Kconfig b/kernel/bpf/Kconfig
>> index eb3de35734f0..a8e004f88b92 100644
>> --- a/kernel/bpf/Kconfig
>> +++ b/kernel/bpf/Kconfig
>
> [ ... ]
>
>> @@ -101,4 +105,9 @@ config BPF_LSM
>>
>>  	  If you are unsure how to answer this question, answer N.
>>
>> +config BPF_JIT_KASAN
>> +	bool
>> +	depends on HAVE_EBPF_JIT_KASAN
>> +	default y if BPF_JIT && KASAN_GENERIC && KASAN_VMALLOC && VMAP_STACK
>> +
>>  endmenu # "BPF subsystem"
>
> This isn't a bug, but a design concern raised on an earlier posting of
> this work doesn't look fully resolved.
>
> In the v1 (RFC) discussion, the suggestion was to not add a config knob
> at all and instead do the instrumentation inside the JIT whenever
> KASAN_GENERIC is set:
>
>   "Let's not add more config knobs. Even this patch looks redundant.
>    Inside JIT do instrumentation when KASAN_GENERIC is set."
>
>   https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAADnVQLj=UosnsC-4V2+mN92Fe0-kW++U+m-O9c93kk6BwiXgw@mail.gmail.com/
>
> The reasoning given for keeping the internal Kconfig was that it lets
> selftests adapt their behavior without sprinkling arch and KASAN
> conditionals, and another reviewer agreed that approach was reasonable.
>
> That "this patch looks redundant" objection was never explicitly
> retracted or re-acked, yet the BPF_JIT_KASAN config is retained here.
>
> Has this design point been settled?

I still advocate to keep this BPF_JIT_KASAN, which is used later in
patch 7/8 to check whether kasan tests should be executed or not.

Alexis
>
> ---
> AI reviewed your patch. Please fix the bug or email reply why it's not a bug.
> See: https://github.com/kernel-patches/vmtest/blob/master/ci/claude/README.md
>
> CI run summary: https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/26978380520




-- 
Alexis Lothoré, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com


  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-09  8:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-04 20:21 [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/8] bpf: add support for KASAN checks in JITed programs Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation)
2026-06-04 20:21 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/8] bpf: mark instructions accessing program stack Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation)
2026-06-04 21:13   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-05 23:20   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-06-04 20:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/8] bpf: add BPF_JIT_KASAN for KASAN instrumentation of JITed programs Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation)
2026-06-04 21:13   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-09  8:47     ` Alexis Lothoré [this message]
2026-06-04 20:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/8] bpf, x86: add helper to emit kasan checks in x86 " Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation)
2026-06-04 20:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 4/8] bpf, x86: refactor BPF_ST management in do_jit Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation)
2026-06-04 21:13   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-05 23:22   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-06-04 20:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 5/8] bpf, x86: emit KASAN checks into x86 JITed programs Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation)
2026-06-05 14:54   ` Yonghong Song
2026-06-05 15:50     ` Alexis Lothoré
2026-06-04 20:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 6/8] bpf, x86: enable KASAN for JITed programs on x86 Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation)
2026-06-04 20:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 7/8] selftests/bpf: add helper to check whether eBPF KASAN is active Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation)
2026-06-04 20:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 8/8] selftests/bpf: add tests to validate KASAN on JIT programs Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation)
2026-06-04 21:45   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-05 15:47   ` Yonghong Song
2026-06-05 16:01     ` Alexis Lothoré
2026-06-05 17:20       ` Yonghong Song
2026-06-05 20:55         ` Alexis Lothoré
2026-06-06  4:09           ` Yonghong Song
2026-06-06  8:51             ` Alexis Lothoré

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DJ4DZHRVAV59.SPVM2QDQN0C@bootlin.com \
    --to=alexis.lothore@bootlin.com \
    --cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bastien.curutchet@bootlin.com \
    --cc=bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=clm@meta.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ebpf@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox