From: "Alexis Lothoré" <alexis.lothore@bootlin.com>
To: "Qiliang Yuan" <odys.yuan@gmail.com>,
"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"Andrii Nakryiko" <andrii@kernel.org>,
"Eduard Zingerman" <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
"Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi" <memxor@gmail.com>,
"Martin KaFai Lau" <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
"Song Liu" <song@kernel.org>,
"Yonghong Song" <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
"Jiri Olsa" <jolsa@kernel.org>,
"Emil Tsalapatis" <emil@etsalapatis.com>,
"Ihor Solodrai" <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>,
"Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>,
"Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation)" <alexis.lothore@bootlin.com>
Cc: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: Run tc_edt serially
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2026 10:55:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DM4FOVA9PW2E.1WIY5HRJWA1QP@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261009-selftests-bpf-tc-edt-serial-v1-1-f72e045f2465@gmail.com>
Hi Qiliang,
On Fri Oct 9, 2026 at 3:50 AM CEST, Qiliang Yuan wrote:
> tc_edt shapes the traffic of a TCP connection between two netns to
> 5Mbps with a BPF program, and checks that the rate it measures from the
> userspace sender and receiver is within 2% of the target.
>
> The measured time includes the time the sender and the receiver take to
> run. When test_progs runs other tests in parallel, the sender and the
> receiver compete with those for the CPUs, the transfer takes longer,
> and the measured rate falls outside of the 2% margin.
>
> Make tc_edt a serial test.
>
> Fixes: b0f82e7ab6fb ("selftests/bpf: integrate test_tc_edt into test_progs")
> Signed-off-by: Qiliang Yuan <odys.yuan@gmail.com>
I don't know how to feel about the proposed fix. As a test involving
bandwith measurement, I get that such things could happen, but:
- I did not see this failure in the recent CI runs (but I could have
missed it)
- if you see it in your setup, how sure are we that it is due to high
CPU usage ? I guess it is very likely, but worth asking
- any idea about how much we are missing the 2% margin ? If this is only
by a little, I would rather increase the margin and keep the tests
parallel, there's not much point being too restrictive on the target
bandwith, if we get something close enough, this is a good proof that
the BPF rate limiter is triggered and running correctly
Thanks,
Alexis
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_tc_edt.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_tc_edt.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_tc_edt.c
> index 462512fb191f1..1e82d88c987a7 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_tc_edt.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_tc_edt.c
> @@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ static void run_test(void)
> "rate error is lower than threshold");
> }
>
> -void test_tc_edt(void)
> +void serial_test_tc_edt(void)
> {
> struct test_tc_edt *skel;
>
>
> ---
> base-commit: e1d84a37cba984388988d2f1ddc84561413f0db2
> change-id: 20261009-selftests-bpf-tc-edt-serial-9c65af71f845
>
> Best regards,
--
Alexis Lothoré, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-14 8:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-09 1:50 [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: Run tc_edt serially Qiliang Yuan
2026-10-14 8:55 ` Alexis Lothoré [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DM4FOVA9PW2E.1WIY5HRJWA1QP@bootlin.com \
--to=alexis.lothore@bootlin.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=odys.yuan@gmail.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox