Linux Kernel Selftest development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Alexis Lothoré" <alexis.lothore@bootlin.com>
To: "Qiliang Yuan" <odys.yuan@gmail.com>,
	"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
	"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	"Andrii Nakryiko" <andrii@kernel.org>,
	"Eduard Zingerman" <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
	"Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi" <memxor@gmail.com>,
	"Martin KaFai Lau" <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
	"Song Liu" <song@kernel.org>,
	"Yonghong Song" <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
	"Jiri Olsa" <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	"Emil Tsalapatis" <emil@etsalapatis.com>,
	"Ihor Solodrai" <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>,
	"Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>,
	"Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation)" <alexis.lothore@bootlin.com>
Cc: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: Run tc_edt serially
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2026 10:55:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DM4FOVA9PW2E.1WIY5HRJWA1QP@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261009-selftests-bpf-tc-edt-serial-v1-1-f72e045f2465@gmail.com>

Hi Qiliang,

On Fri Oct 9, 2026 at 3:50 AM CEST, Qiliang Yuan wrote:
> tc_edt shapes the traffic of a TCP connection between two netns to
> 5Mbps with a BPF program, and checks that the rate it measures from the
> userspace sender and receiver is within 2% of the target.
>
> The measured time includes the time the sender and the receiver take to
> run. When test_progs runs other tests in parallel, the sender and the
> receiver compete with those for the CPUs, the transfer takes longer,
> and the measured rate falls outside of the 2% margin.
>
> Make tc_edt a serial test.
>
> Fixes: b0f82e7ab6fb ("selftests/bpf: integrate test_tc_edt into test_progs")
> Signed-off-by: Qiliang Yuan <odys.yuan@gmail.com>

I don't know how to feel about the proposed fix. As a test involving
bandwith measurement, I get that such things could happen, but:
- I did not see this failure in the recent CI runs (but I could have
  missed it)
- if you see it in your setup, how sure are we that it is due to high
  CPU usage ? I guess it is very likely, but worth asking
- any idea about how much we are missing the 2% margin ? If this is only
  by a little, I would rather increase the margin and keep the tests
  parallel, there's not much point being too restrictive on the target
  bandwith, if we get something close enough, this is a good proof that
  the BPF rate limiter is triggered and running correctly

Thanks,

Alexis
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_tc_edt.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_tc_edt.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_tc_edt.c
> index 462512fb191f1..1e82d88c987a7 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_tc_edt.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_tc_edt.c
> @@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ static void run_test(void)
>  		  "rate error is lower than threshold");
>  }
>  
> -void test_tc_edt(void)
> +void serial_test_tc_edt(void)
>  {
>  	struct test_tc_edt *skel;
>  
>
> ---
> base-commit: e1d84a37cba984388988d2f1ddc84561413f0db2
> change-id: 20261009-selftests-bpf-tc-edt-serial-9c65af71f845
>
> Best regards,





-- 
Alexis Lothoré, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com


      reply	other threads:[~2026-10-14  8:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-09  1:50 [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: Run tc_edt serially Qiliang Yuan
2026-10-14  8:55 ` Alexis Lothoré [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DM4FOVA9PW2E.1WIY5HRJWA1QP@bootlin.com \
    --to=alexis.lothore@bootlin.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
    --cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=odys.yuan@gmail.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox