From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-23.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 824B5C4332E for ; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 20:08:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CF0123119 for ; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 20:08:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728613AbhASUHl (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jan 2021 15:07:41 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40806 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2392228AbhASUGP (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jan 2021 15:06:15 -0500 Received: from mail-pf1-x42a.google.com (mail-pf1-x42a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD04BC0613CF for ; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 12:05:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pf1-x42a.google.com with SMTP id m6so12976134pfk.1 for ; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 12:05:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=dEsHTOhzjzO6o9rD2N5DWat/JJ7Q/inxXOWFBgJvDTI=; b=K+bN7LxeDH9XpNlaRCisKxW2aaVCwJe4CNdTG6tvSMlY1NKYzVqi/c0D296XP5aKcQ vUnMolIDkQbec9Fxty0H5C7DMbnEja+e8mtAWtjuIXBlC69TJ+lZ2jBFF0EUm3YF4y4+ mscHktxp4ZgF386MBk+ktfaMNkksLFDDCZPRSOlxx5FvNGZWrtkyH/zYAi+8i0kUhjHe 6avmHs3Ff9t4FL8Mc3UN62O8S71aW3FfzgZEP2LTpvtvC4PL/6cQ7eI+u+8CsLOkNf4w zAwWWTe55Wff5axBTrbbA7IsfG91LIvnbel6MIKkmqYhg3Q1NbbsuvTpn2lpi71QiCCd qZIg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=dEsHTOhzjzO6o9rD2N5DWat/JJ7Q/inxXOWFBgJvDTI=; b=Zcc8TctUoe3/1oM/oRamHAngHmLFKYhEdvB6g9/Yr/QXkBh4Bxd+i6JIY+OCFBXre5 3fayLRoDUNzcJelReh/G1GFaoAAjlsxGsVZZWfYBnz3fZ1ZmzqpOIioNbjOL1A/O91in azn7uMdAKFLwPPwqMWiSZ3LvxeS/V6FU4ATD5fAvLsLYv3yRMbNGeciY+0WVz2Km8i/z N09KvxwXrND3MADAiAKg09U1y29Gvz4wd59+Z+QI7n+AQIIRibOGpBAgnANYc5fOsg6x +P7sWFAlO9mntof1p/PJ0hcxweXBQSQmMUB5MYaeEg5yYD09O3lnRAfg1kzAQNzV+p4z msqA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Ux+/1KtffOk+7lD52zJBJd088F3zA28y3vpbi7zhTULR39t/J 5TcDbCq8xfRFe/DaVrBNaVlRAw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxmIAjwqUXjXQNHFrRcsGx95boV03xzh9T8vnt0imRm6wf7NGD39Q/j7y43K/NTXLpdtIKPXw== X-Received: by 2002:a62:a508:0:b029:1ba:621:ff29 with SMTP id v8-20020a62a5080000b02901ba0621ff29mr2692033pfm.44.1611086734975; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 12:05:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from google.com ([2620:15c:f:10:1ea0:b8ff:fe73:50f5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a9sm19613789pfn.178.2021.01.19.12.05.32 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 19 Jan 2021 12:05:34 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 12:05:27 -0800 From: Sean Christopherson To: Tianjia Zhang Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andrew Morton , Shuah Khan , haitao.huang@intel.com, Kai Huang , x86@kernel.org, linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Jia Zhang Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/sgx: Allows ioctl PROVISION to execute before CREATE Message-ID: References: <20210118133335.98907-1-tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210118133335.98907-1-tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 18, 2021, Tianjia Zhang wrote: > In function sgx_encl_create(), the logic of directly assigning > value to attributes_mask determines that the call to > SGX_IOC_ENCLAVE_PROVISION must be after the command of > SGX_IOC_ENCLAVE_CREATE. If change this assignment statement to > or operation, the PROVISION command can be executed earlier and > more flexibly. > > Reported-by: Jia Zhang > Signed-off-by: Tianjia Zhang > --- > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/ioctl.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/ioctl.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/ioctl.c > index f45957c05f69..0ca3fc238bc2 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/ioctl.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/ioctl.c > @@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ static int sgx_encl_create(struct sgx_encl *encl, struct sgx_secs *secs) > encl->base = secs->base; > encl->size = secs->size; > encl->attributes = secs->attributes; > - encl->attributes_mask = SGX_ATTR_DEBUG | SGX_ATTR_MODE64BIT | SGX_ATTR_KSS; > + encl->attributes_mask |= SGX_ATTR_DEBUG | SGX_ATTR_MODE64BIT | SGX_ATTR_KSS; Alternatively, move the existing code to sgx_open()? Initializing the field when the encl object is allocated feels more correct. > /* Set only after completion, as encl->lock has not been taken. */ > set_bit(SGX_ENCL_CREATED, &encl->flags); > -- > 2.19.1.3.ge56e4f7 >