From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Cc: alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, acme@kernel.org,
mingo@redhat.com, jolsa@redhat.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
namhyung@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, glider@google.com,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, arnd@arndb.de, christian@brauner.io,
dvyukov@google.com, jannh@google.com, axboe@kernel.dk,
mascasa@google.com, pcc@google.com, irogers@google.com,
kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 8/8] selftests/perf: Add kselftest for remove_on_exec
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 17:42:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YFjI5qU0z3Q7J/jF@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YFiamKX+xYH2HJ4E@elver.google.com>
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 02:24:40PM +0100, Marco Elver wrote:
> To make compatible with more recent libc, we'll need to fixup the tests
> with the below.
OK, that reprodiced things here, thanks!
The below seems to not explode instantly.... it still has the
alternative version in as well (and I think it might even work too, but
the one I left in seems simpler).
---
kernel/events/core.c | 154 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 111 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index a7220e8c447e..8c0f905cc017 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -2167,8 +2172,9 @@ static void perf_group_detach(struct perf_event *event)
* If this is a sibling, remove it from its group.
*/
if (leader != event) {
+ leader->nr_siblings--;
list_del_init(&event->sibling_list);
- event->group_leader->nr_siblings--;
+ event->group_leader = event;
goto out;
}
@@ -2182,8 +2188,9 @@ static void perf_group_detach(struct perf_event *event)
if (sibling->event_caps & PERF_EV_CAP_SIBLING)
perf_remove_sibling_event(sibling);
- sibling->group_leader = sibling;
+ leader->nr_siblings--;
list_del_init(&sibling->sibling_list);
+ sibling->group_leader = sibling;
/* Inherit group flags from the previous leader */
sibling->group_caps = event->group_caps;
@@ -2360,10 +2367,19 @@ __perf_remove_from_context(struct perf_event *event,
static void perf_remove_from_context(struct perf_event *event, unsigned long flags)
{
struct perf_event_context *ctx = event->ctx;
+ bool remove;
lockdep_assert_held(&ctx->mutex);
- event_function_call(event, __perf_remove_from_context, (void *)flags);
+ /*
+ * There is concurrency vs remove_on_exec().
+ */
+ raw_spin_lock_irq(&ctx->lock);
+ remove = (event->attach_state & PERF_ATTACH_CONTEXT);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->lock);
+
+ if (remove)
+ event_function_call(event, __perf_remove_from_context, (void *)flags);
/*
* The above event_function_call() can NO-OP when it hits
@@ -4232,41 +4248,92 @@ static void perf_event_enable_on_exec(int ctxn)
static void perf_remove_from_owner(struct perf_event *event);
static void perf_event_exit_event(struct perf_event *child_event,
struct perf_event_context *child_ctx,
- struct task_struct *child);
+ struct task_struct *child,
+ bool removed);
/*
* Removes all events from the current task that have been marked
* remove-on-exec, and feeds their values back to parent events.
*/
-static void perf_event_remove_on_exec(void)
+static void perf_event_remove_on_exec(int ctxn)
{
- int ctxn;
+ struct perf_event_context *ctx, *clone_ctx = NULL;
+ struct perf_event *event, *next;
+ LIST_HEAD(free_list);
+ unsigned long flags;
+ bool modified = false;
- for_each_task_context_nr(ctxn) {
- struct perf_event_context *ctx;
- struct perf_event *event, *next;
+ ctx = perf_pin_task_context(current, ctxn);
+ if (!ctx)
+ return;
- ctx = perf_pin_task_context(current, ctxn);
- if (!ctx)
+ mutex_lock(&ctx->mutex);
+
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(ctx->task != current))
+ goto unlock;
+
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(event, next, &ctx->event_list, event_entry) {
+ if (!event->attr.remove_on_exec)
continue;
- mutex_lock(&ctx->mutex);
- list_for_each_entry_safe(event, next, &ctx->event_list, event_entry) {
- if (!event->attr.remove_on_exec)
- continue;
+ if (!is_kernel_event(event))
+ perf_remove_from_owner(event);
- if (!is_kernel_event(event))
- perf_remove_from_owner(event);
- perf_remove_from_context(event, DETACH_GROUP);
- /*
- * Remove the event and feed back its values to the
- * parent event.
- */
- perf_event_exit_event(event, ctx, current);
- }
- mutex_unlock(&ctx->mutex);
- put_ctx(ctx);
+ modified = true;
+
+ perf_remove_from_context(event, !!event->parent * DETACH_GROUP);
+ perf_event_exit_event(event, ctx, current, true);
+ }
+
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&ctx->lock, flags);
+ if (modified)
+ clone_ctx = unclone_ctx(ctx);
+ --ctx->pin_count;
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctx->lock, flags);
+
+#if 0
+ struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx;
+
+ if (!modified) {
+ perf_unpin_context(ctx);
+ goto unlock;
+ }
+
+ local_irq_save(flags);
+ cpuctx = __get_cpu_context(ctx);
+ perf_ctx_lock(cpuctx, ctx);
+ task_ctx_sched_out(cpuctx, ctx, EVENT_ALL);
+
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(event, next, &ctx->event_list, event_entry) {
+ if (!event->attr.remove_on_exec)
+ continue;
+
+ if (event->parent)
+ perf_group_detach(event);
+ list_del_event(event, ctx);
+
+ list_add(&event->active_list, &free_list);
+ }
+
+ ctx_resched(cpuctx, ctx, EVENT_ALL);
+
+ clone_ctx = unclone_ctx(ctx);
+ --ctx->pin_count;
+ perf_ctx_unlock(cpuctx, ctx);
+ local_irq_restore(flags);
+
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(event, next, &free_list, active_entry) {
+ list_del(&event->active_entry);
+ perf_event_exit_event(event, ctx, current, true);
}
+#endif
+
+unlock:
+ mutex_unlock(&ctx->mutex);
+
+ put_ctx(ctx);
+ if (clone_ctx)
+ put_ctx(clone_ctx);
}
struct perf_read_data {
@@ -7615,20 +7682,18 @@ void perf_event_exec(void)
struct perf_event_context *ctx;
int ctxn;
- rcu_read_lock();
for_each_task_context_nr(ctxn) {
- ctx = current->perf_event_ctxp[ctxn];
- if (!ctx)
- continue;
-
perf_event_enable_on_exec(ctxn);
+ perf_event_remove_on_exec(ctxn);
- perf_iterate_ctx(ctx, perf_event_addr_filters_exec, NULL,
- true);
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ ctx = rcu_dereference(current->perf_event_ctxp[ctxn]);
+ if (ctx) {
+ perf_iterate_ctx(ctx, perf_event_addr_filters_exec,
+ NULL, true);
+ }
+ rcu_read_unlock();
}
- rcu_read_unlock();
-
- perf_event_remove_on_exec();
}
struct remote_output {
@@ -12509,7 +12574,7 @@ static void sync_child_event(struct perf_event *child_event,
static void
perf_event_exit_event(struct perf_event *child_event,
struct perf_event_context *child_ctx,
- struct task_struct *child)
+ struct task_struct *child, bool removed)
{
struct perf_event *parent_event = child_event->parent;
@@ -12526,12 +12591,15 @@ perf_event_exit_event(struct perf_event *child_event,
* and being thorough is better.
*/
raw_spin_lock_irq(&child_ctx->lock);
- WARN_ON_ONCE(child_ctx->is_active);
+ if (!removed) {
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(child_ctx->is_active);
- if (parent_event)
- perf_group_detach(child_event);
- list_del_event(child_event, child_ctx);
- perf_event_set_state(child_event, PERF_EVENT_STATE_EXIT); /* is_event_hup() */
+ if (parent_event)
+ perf_group_detach(child_event);
+ list_del_event(child_event, child_ctx);
+ }
+ if (child_event->state >= PERF_EVENT_STATE_EXIT)
+ perf_event_set_state(child_event, PERF_EVENT_STATE_EXIT); /* is_event_hup() */
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&child_ctx->lock);
/*
@@ -12617,7 +12685,7 @@ static void perf_event_exit_task_context(struct task_struct *child, int ctxn)
perf_event_task(child, child_ctx, 0);
list_for_each_entry_safe(child_event, next, &child_ctx->event_list, event_entry)
- perf_event_exit_event(child_event, child_ctx, child);
+ perf_event_exit_event(child_event, child_ctx, child, false);
mutex_unlock(&child_ctx->mutex);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-22 16:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-10 10:41 [PATCH RFC v2 0/8] Add support for synchronous signals on perf events Marco Elver
2021-03-10 10:41 ` [PATCH RFC v2 1/8] perf/core: Apply PERF_EVENT_IOC_MODIFY_ATTRIBUTES to children Marco Elver
2021-03-10 10:41 ` [PATCH RFC v2 2/8] perf/core: Support only inheriting events if cloned with CLONE_THREAD Marco Elver
2021-03-10 10:41 ` [PATCH RFC v2 3/8] perf/core: Add support for event removal on exec Marco Elver
2021-03-10 10:47 ` Marco Elver
2021-03-16 16:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-22 9:20 ` Marco Elver
2021-03-10 10:41 ` [PATCH RFC v2 4/8] signal: Introduce TRAP_PERF si_code and si_perf to siginfo Marco Elver
2021-03-10 10:41 ` [PATCH RFC v2 5/8] perf/core: Add support for SIGTRAP on perf events Marco Elver
2021-03-10 10:41 ` [PATCH RFC v2 6/8] perf/core: Add breakpoint information to siginfo on SIGTRAP Marco Elver
2021-03-10 10:41 ` [PATCH RFC v2 7/8] selftests/perf: Add kselftest for process-wide sigtrap handling Marco Elver
2021-03-10 10:41 ` [PATCH RFC v2 8/8] selftests/perf: Add kselftest for remove_on_exec Marco Elver
2021-03-22 13:24 ` Marco Elver
2021-03-22 16:42 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2021-03-23 9:52 ` Marco Elver
2021-03-23 10:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-23 10:41 ` Marco Elver
2021-03-23 12:08 ` Marco Elver
2021-03-23 14:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-23 15:58 ` Marco Elver
2021-03-23 16:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-23 3:10 ` Ian Rogers
2021-03-23 9:47 ` Marco Elver
2021-03-23 19:16 ` Marco Elver
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YFjI5qU0z3Q7J/jF@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=christian@brauner.io \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mascasa@google.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=pcc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox