From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 440CDC48BE0 for ; Fri, 11 Jun 2021 09:55:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 279A9613E9 for ; Fri, 11 Jun 2021 09:55:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229480AbhFKJ5d (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jun 2021 05:57:33 -0400 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:17450 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229633AbhFKJ5c (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jun 2021 05:57:32 -0400 IronPort-SDR: VtVoc5iLZKz0CK2XAjM2ytr9skreuYSnr6KE3Zhgf4QbqvQReK6FzK5IBpeNjp1ZDrietAwYhV WRgJDkd/xnJQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10011"; a="205455825" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.83,265,1616482800"; d="scan'208";a="205455825" Received: from orsmga004.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.38]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Jun 2021 02:55:32 -0700 IronPort-SDR: zQiO9KYtol5E/fgSyNcc7ANqdkyiVXaJgjmcQuhtPZEO8lTdqK/E21ixW/LrjKQA7pZGOIVNLH CLSxhkuyOuhQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.83,265,1616482800"; d="scan'208";a="552648386" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com (HELO smile) ([10.237.68.40]) by orsmga004-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Jun 2021 02:55:28 -0700 Received: from andy by smile with local (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1lrdsr-001TgV-PV; Fri, 11 Jun 2021 12:55:25 +0300 Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2021 12:55:25 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9?= Almeida Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Brendan Higgins , linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, Shuah Khan , ~lkcamp/patches@lists.sr.ht, nfraprado@collabora.com, leandro.ribeiro@collabora.com, Vitor Massaru Iha , lucmaga@gmail.com, David Gow , Daniel Latypov , tales.aparecida@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/1] lib: Convert UUID runtime test to KUnit Message-ID: References: <20210610163959.71634-1-andrealmeid@collabora.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20210610163959.71634-1-andrealmeid@collabora.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 01:39:58PM -0300, André Almeida wrote: > Hi, > > This patch converts existing UUID runtime test to use KUnit framework. > > Below, there's a comparison between the old output format and the new > one. Keep in mind that even if KUnit seems very verbose, this is the > corner case where _every_ test has failed. Btw, do we have test coverage statistics? I mean since we reduced 18 test cases to 12, do we still have the same / better test coverage? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko