From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kselftest-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AA9CC433EF
	for <linux-kselftest@archiver.kernel.org>; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 11:34:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S240991AbiBJLee (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kselftest@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 10 Feb 2022 06:34:34 -0500
Received: from mxb-00190b01.gslb.pphosted.com ([23.128.96.19]:39196 "EHLO
        lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S235635AbiBJLee (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 10 Feb 2022 06:34:34 -0500
Received: from sin.source.kernel.org (sin.source.kernel.org [145.40.73.55])
        by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CD611001
        for <linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 03:34:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140])
        (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
        (No client certificate requested)
        by sin.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 803B9CE243E
        for <linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 11:34:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E8D65C004E1;
        Thu, 10 Feb 2022 11:34:28 +0000 (UTC)
Date:   Thu, 10 Feb 2022 11:34:25 +0000
From:   Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc:     Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
        Alan Hayward <alan.hayward@arm.com>,
        Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com>,
        Salil Akerkar <Salil.Akerkar@arm.com>,
        Basant Kumar Dwivedi <Basant.KumarDwivedi@arm.com>,
        Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@arm.com>,
        James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
        Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 01/40] arm64: Define CPACR_EL1_FPEN similarly to
 other floating point controls
Message-ID: <YgT4QQmjIHrc74ga@arm.com>
References: <20220207152109.197566-1-broonie@kernel.org>
 <20220207152109.197566-2-broonie@kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220207152109.197566-2-broonie@kernel.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kselftest.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Feb 07, 2022 at 03:20:30PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> The base floating point, SVE and SME all have enable controls for EL0 and
> EL1 in CPACR_EL1 which have a similar layout and function. Currently the
> basic floating point enable FPEN is defined differently to the SVE control,
> specified as a single define in kvm_arm.h rather than in sysreg.h. Move the
> define to sysreg.h and provide separate EL0 and EL1 control bits so code
> managing the different floating point enables can look consistent.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>