From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@chromium.org>
Cc: kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>,
Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/6] thunderbolt: test: use NULL macros
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2022 18:31:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YgaPXhOr/lFny4IS@lahna> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YgaOS8BLz23k6JVq@lahna>
On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 06:26:56PM +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > To test it I had enabled:
> > PCI, USB4 and USB4_KUNIT_TEST
> >
> > and then run it with
> >
> > ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --jobs=$(nproc) --arch=x86_64
> >
> > Unfortunately, kunit was not able to run the tests
> >
> > This hack did the trick:
> >
> >
> > int tb_test_init(void)
> > {
> > - return __kunit_test_suites_init(tb_test_suites);
> > + //return __kunit_test_suites_init(tb_test_suites);
> > + return 0;
> > }
> >
> > void tb_test_exit(void)
> > {
> > - return __kunit_test_suites_exit(tb_test_suites);
> > + //return __kunit_test_suites_exit(tb_test_suites);
> > }
> > +
> > +kunit_test_suites(&tb_test_suite);
> >
> > I looked into why we do this and I found:
> >
> > thunderbolt: Allow KUnit tests to be built also when CONFIG_USB4=m
> >
> >
> > I am a bit confused. The patch talks about build coverage, but even
> > with that patch reverted if
> > USB4_KUNIT_TEST=m
> > then test.c is built.
> >
> > Shouldn't we simply revert that patch?
>
> Nah, either build it into the kernel or load the driver manually:
>
> # modprobe thunderbolt
Forgot to explain why this does not run the tests (I think):
./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --jobs=$(nproc) --arch=x86_64
The driver depends on PCI and I don't think that's enabled on UML at
least. I typically run it inside QEMU.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-11 16:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-11 9:41 [PATCH v5 1/6] kunit: Introduce _NULL and _NOT_NULL macros Ricardo Ribalda
2022-02-11 9:41 ` [PATCH v5 2/6] kunit: use NULL macros Ricardo Ribalda
2022-02-11 9:41 ` [PATCH v5 3/6] thunderbolt: test: " Ricardo Ribalda
2022-02-11 10:08 ` Mika Westerberg
2022-02-11 15:49 ` Ricardo Ribalda
2022-02-11 16:26 ` Mika Westerberg
2022-02-11 16:31 ` Mika Westerberg [this message]
2022-02-11 16:33 ` Ricardo Ribalda
2022-02-11 22:54 ` Daniel Latypov
2022-02-14 6:24 ` Mika Westerberg
2022-02-14 18:43 ` Daniel Latypov
2022-02-11 9:41 ` [PATCH v5 4/6] kasan: test: Use " Ricardo Ribalda
2022-02-11 9:41 ` [PATCH v5 5/6] mctp: " Ricardo Ribalda
2022-02-11 9:41 ` [PATCH v5 6/6] apparmor: " Ricardo Ribalda
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YgaPXhOr/lFny4IS@lahna \
--to=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=brendanhiggins@google.com \
--cc=dlatypov@google.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ribalda@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox