From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E16C61A9B58 for ; Tue, 25 Feb 2025 20:37:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1740515840; cv=none; b=eHDBVgDwK2yiC5YFkF6hSyGwIXqPLor9Bn6jl+oS8dRUi0mXs1MWb2H1b6Sps9NcpEm5K/V+62r05HsLDXz1XlP6IUS4Unp9moXR+710CMxA/5QqoeyWOmECGox1umR+u2MN4uH8lBtNMG6d42DVtQmI0S1tKfZSlqhTwY0Ahkw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1740515840; c=relaxed/simple; bh=iANJ7jUuLPOAUdWYvwdIPBdpaK1PGcaz53zJhHH7W28=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=k1opZz2Sjyz5NV0NytsnCIp8XrtkiARLyi3P6UOPy1jxjLVMYX6Z3WBJPjEGaBY8WCAnZSrYtfCzFiO0cxlq2WARQ6Dft8CeRW/hO27rJwQE0P6EFDNsEV8VV5OapyX+jMlwf1GGdblXVL+K+QgTi4u4Zo+Vbpvu7tgixjdWJX0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=iOGI11ig; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="iOGI11ig" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1740515835; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=zRqlIAwXEZAt9A8J1cznfUQsjJ6aJaejVBOoC9QBm/E=; b=iOGI11igcjgJFF8tzY6bS4Ui92NtzARpkbgRR/Y3L9WYW/bxyLdP/62XRU06WZuviYddyb YgU+u1PqGQNhL3bIwkXk0ax4YSDHFjJjfZevtAyyIgI1ACd9yKgSadelhIX6zXj7Z/coPK fQJ4CZu5vQUVMOf3xyZyob1bTg552RU= Received: from mail-ot1-f69.google.com (mail-ot1-f69.google.com [209.85.210.69]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-99-Yqd-S2X2MhSLsgh54rm0Ng-1; Tue, 25 Feb 2025 15:37:14 -0500 X-MC-Unique: Yqd-S2X2MhSLsgh54rm0Ng-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: Yqd-S2X2MhSLsgh54rm0Ng_1740515833 Received: by mail-ot1-f69.google.com with SMTP id 46e09a7af769-7272acb753bso5769693a34.1 for ; Tue, 25 Feb 2025 12:37:14 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1740515833; x=1741120633; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=zRqlIAwXEZAt9A8J1cznfUQsjJ6aJaejVBOoC9QBm/E=; b=b0Dq9cbZl9IcafDgiKVCQZ08/hGZD6qWy4mQLZT8g3x556wgm1sqwUor0MDbhqIQG4 /oU5DGSugJBdnIrzB6nvTw/mJSSLs5VCEFXFogvnzUMUzV1OMfK0etpJMShrkGFrjmOb 3IPzpl4Ci6AbdlUMdOagPaBkjT43SFLgaiCH5C9GEUl1d8hQilFtCK9m/p+P21i3YAJW odhyLSSJcEU+IXJt7Ni2qYiyAg1X9L5tv00XHc2m4qpQ3nafwLBI+ED2tlTw8x0Ub/Tl YL1yzIUoIjUMBIECst2g2gQojijt23jODG1gSnq6/UEKiHazfTR0FMohe1HNW/vMfT7A 3gKw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWSnNgR0uLExenqFi9oGBqp3AaLbaMbhtOP7FfjCQnsEbFuWsN7ukscFAVtAn4J4BJsPbE5omi+DkFigt53vSY=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwuVoFLhxHsAfweFZbDgY4OyN5srl7/39X+wZzrKDfDxBPemO15 TMCNDsbFpYqzykqmlcWcf46idKM1bFygKG5QfmY3isY1HZ1slj5YTnj9+C9EGbR18iMPuZDtZVO Nbnor9Z0yOKPoQ3A9gO5AcGqAI/Q0bJiKucXj/OJZ2xJfRvxCj8fr7PIeVP/2hoBctw== X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncuwipRZLk7Jnx7FYlVSN0HuuSHPWemFwq2VbSo4nQhZIBPfZu331UJgnOzrWX5 Oc/BuFbBAdeEqIkPP+Jh9un9NvmrsqD42qPyzFtAENKl/SzSbh8ZIpNPCrClbu26ZL8XNnMYeYk T03G39pmV/iA9mskkdtMr9tpK51eZArjSan00KimrMND6phSNuD2XFXTuIDUaiHi2jEW8DKiRhY VYA93WhQJcvmY1RGA15TFFlLzAHApTmcczbRgEyf1z0uegRU9F8KwjHENrKFUnIweOqtg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:6c11:b0:727:25c6:1b60 with SMTP id 46e09a7af769-7274c1840famr14524645a34.5.1740515833595; Tue, 25 Feb 2025 12:37:13 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFotTZ/dQhUmhniqjIu8SiEBEne0EGahBIhmibL4OkgpDX+sNTQXhjiXbEsxwXRiWLeeDe4Vw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:6c11:b0:727:25c6:1b60 with SMTP id 46e09a7af769-7274c1840famr14524623a34.5.1740515833295; Tue, 25 Feb 2025 12:37:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from x1.local ([2604:7a40:2041:2b00::1000]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 46e09a7af769-7289deed409sm431155a34.40.2025.02.25.12.37.10 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 25 Feb 2025 12:37:12 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 15:37:07 -0500 From: Peter Xu To: Ackerley Tng Cc: tabba@google.com, quic_eberman@quicinc.com, roypat@amazon.co.uk, jgg@nvidia.com, david@redhat.com, rientjes@google.com, fvdl@google.com, jthoughton@google.com, seanjc@google.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, zhiquan1.li@intel.com, fan.du@intel.com, jun.miao@intel.com, isaku.yamahata@intel.com, muchun.song@linux.dev, mike.kravetz@oracle.com, erdemaktas@google.com, vannapurve@google.com, qperret@google.com, jhubbard@nvidia.com, willy@infradead.org, shuah@kernel.org, brauner@kernel.org, bfoster@redhat.com, kent.overstreet@linux.dev, pvorel@suse.cz, rppt@kernel.org, richard.weiyang@gmail.com, anup@brainfault.org, haibo1.xu@intel.com, ajones@ventanamicro.com, vkuznets@redhat.com, maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com, pgonda@google.com, oliver.upton@linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@kvack.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 26/39] KVM: guest_memfd: Track faultability within a struct kvm_gmem_private Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 11:43:57PM +0000, Ackerley Tng wrote: > @@ -1079,12 +1152,20 @@ static struct inode *kvm_gmem_inode_make_secure_inode(const char *name, > if (err) > goto out; > > + err = -ENOMEM; > + private = kzalloc(sizeof(*private), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!private) > + goto out; > + > if (flags & KVM_GUEST_MEMFD_HUGETLB) { > - err = kvm_gmem_hugetlb_setup(inode, size, flags); > + err = kvm_gmem_hugetlb_setup(inode, private, size, flags); > if (err) > - goto out; > + goto free_private; > } > > + xa_init(&private->faultability); > + inode->i_mapping->i_private_data = private; > + > inode->i_private = (void *)(unsigned long)flags; Looks like inode->i_private isn't used before this series; the flags was always zero before anyway. Maybe it could keep kvm_gmem_inode_private instead? Then make the flags be part of the struct. It avoids two separate places (inode->i_mapping->i_private_data, inode->i_private) to store gmem private info. > inode->i_op = &kvm_gmem_iops; > inode->i_mapping->a_ops = &kvm_gmem_aops; > @@ -1097,6 +1178,8 @@ static struct inode *kvm_gmem_inode_make_secure_inode(const char *name, > > return inode; > > +free_private: > + kfree(private); > out: > iput(inode); > > -- > 2.46.0.598.g6f2099f65c-goog > -- Peter Xu