From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B490DEB64DC for ; Tue, 11 Jul 2023 01:45:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229590AbjGKBpk (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jul 2023 21:45:40 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48396 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229564AbjGKBpj (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jul 2023 21:45:39 -0400 Received: from mail-oi1-x22e.google.com (mail-oi1-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::22e]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CD6FE1; Mon, 10 Jul 2023 18:45:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oi1-x22e.google.com with SMTP id 5614622812f47-3a3790a0a48so3980490b6e.1; Mon, 10 Jul 2023 18:45:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1689039938; x=1691631938; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=RpT1Zdi1tyj6h+VTlL69D/4kKVXAEIcYNY1HQcB2aX4=; b=djAxqkMNUbvbWccTngseI3ojv/tdct6mAnGVNvGsN66Rw0+/KG7ZP1kClU3wvuQ6c8 GQ3KzQTxKalzx1Byuu+AtWpNXZKf1pOn/BjPXwU8xriOIpmywR5Cxe3H50bDyXGBkD7r xCf2GfJBLu8jwaE98lnR19uC0MBtGk7YoyMWMUoyCxojgfxDvlY+XTYzEHZHKe2zPKnR MnMJDm6w2ILbXhhgiiIjXW+yONQcPktxxcEGQg2VT34YKwlJKF6DXwCFWvdaAZ0HjZ/A xO4fVg3lf1hHzSlYuyu4WAil3G3kxest1hcp3YgefhVjBqd2A4195LYOjXdaHpsE5JjC jIjw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1689039938; x=1691631938; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:sender:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=RpT1Zdi1tyj6h+VTlL69D/4kKVXAEIcYNY1HQcB2aX4=; b=mFnt0euKuGUe1yzx5bJp/cs1NAW4YFQM5F1+vaxoUG4EPVa8jrfyeUmbq8JH0m9Twb YRsimc8FzyiMsOENVd/yBxvw9+cfkYP+fwKZIKsvws9OUmmF5OUyBwZ9SvvNWN4dYxtE gcLLKNLq7dugXnPZS3jfiyfIm1y+HPRR1TMsn9GYGilwmg3Az/2gZE8LsM33sF2ezBKi 7tM3s2v0BVjZJ7hET62VfsuNWB/bevqK10fvSw2D3wJWoncVUFj5hgNSjp4cGOviCeXb aN1wf40qhXBthFg14boAhUC3Z9ggqzund2IBGcLmXZlfClfsXWGIV+WeNGp73z3pHFoc MQjg== X-Gm-Message-State: ABy/qLYMfvYoizqKyCLcTsM/mn9I7o+1BNtL6XvKEDiji3wGgu6yHm29 IijDdofZc1SGKsb63Vtr+tWI7FAKxfv67w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APBJJlEy7PyAb4oSWWR+v7ueZ6ZgmdbI4AkEXXJGBxuBwPmWNdecumDYZPQGa9HxUFobEGELaE631Q== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:23ca:b0:3a4:12ab:8033 with SMTP id bq10-20020a05680823ca00b003a412ab8033mr2593430oib.24.1689039938332; Mon, 10 Jul 2023 18:45:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2620:10d:c090:400::5:e2fe]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x11-20020a63b34b000000b005533c53f550sm292860pgt.45.2023.07.10.18.45.37 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 10 Jul 2023 18:45:37 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Tejun Heo Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2023 15:45:36 -1000 From: Tejun Heo To: Waiman Long Cc: Zefan Li , Johannes Weiner , Jonathan Corbet , Shuah Khan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Juri Lelli , Valentin Schneider , Frederic Weisbecker , Mrunal Patel , Ryan Phillips , Brent Rowsell , Peter Hunt , Phil Auld Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] cgroup/cpuset: Support remote partitions Message-ID: References: <20230627143508.1576882-1-longman@redhat.com> <305038a0-1db8-3d0d-3447-48be1f03d41c@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Hello, On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 09:38:12PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: > I don't want to add another cpuset.cpus.exclusive.effective control file. > One possibility is to keep another effective masks in the struct cpuset and > list both exclusive cpus set by the user and the effective ones side by > side, like " ()" if they differ or some other format. > What do you think? Hmm... if we go for separate effective mask, I think it'd be better to stay consistent with cpuset.cpus[.effective]. That's the convention both cpuset.cpus and cpuset.mems already follow. I'm not sure what we'd gain by deviating. Thanks. -- tejun