Re: [PATCH RFC RFT v2 2/5] fork: Add shadow stack support to clone3()

Mark Brown
2023-11-20T16:11:15Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 424 bytes --]

On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 05:43:26PM +0000, Edgecombe, Rick P wrote:

> Either of those seem fine to me, but it would be nice to get it vetted
> by the libc folks before committing. I'd maybe lean towards the one you
> suggested without the new flag.

I'll go with just taking the stack size as a parameter then, less
validation, hopefully the userspace people will be OK with that - I
agree it'd be best to get their buy in.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]