Linux Kernel Selftest development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Jose Fernandez <josef@netflix.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
	Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.pizza>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 bpf-next 1/2] bpf: add bpf_task_get_cgroup kfunc
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 07:41:17 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zfr1jQ6W6yaLsHID@mtj.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240319050302.1085006-1-josef@netflix.com>

On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 11:03:01PM -0600, Jose Fernandez wrote:
> This patch enhances the BPF helpers by adding a kfunc to retrieve the
> cgroup v2 of a task, addressing a previous limitation where only
> bpf_task_get_cgroup1 was available for cgroup v1. The new kfunc is
> particularly useful for scenarios where obtaining the cgroup ID of a
> task other than the "current" one is necessary, which the existing
> bpf_get_current_cgroup_id helper cannot accommodate. A specific use
> case at Netflix involved the sched_switch tracepoint, where we had to
> get the cgroup IDs of both the prev and next tasks.
> 
> The bpf_task_get_cgroup kfunc acquires and returns a reference to a
> task's default cgroup, ensuring thread-safe access by correctly
> implementing RCU read locking and unlocking. It leverages the existing
> cgroup.h helper, and cgroup_tryget to safely acquire a reference to it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jose Fernandez <josef@netflix.com>
> Reviewed-by: Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.pizza>
> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
> Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>

Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>

but some questions below

> +__bpf_kfunc struct cgroup *bpf_task_get_cgroup(struct task_struct *task)
> +{
> +	struct cgroup *cgrp;
> +
> +	rcu_read_lock();
> +	cgrp = task_dfl_cgroup(task);
> +	if (!cgroup_tryget(cgrp))
> +		cgrp = NULL;
> +	rcu_read_unlock();
> +	return cgrp;
> +}

So, as this is a lot easier in cgroup2, the above can probably be written
directly in BPF (untested and not sure the necessary annotations are in
place, so please take it with a big grain of salt):

	bpf_rcu_read_lock();
	cgrp = task->cgroups->dfl_cgrp;
	cgrp = bpf_cgroup_from_id(cgrp->kn.id);
	bpf_rcu_read_unlock();

If all you need is ID, it's even simpler:

	bpf_rcu_read_lock();
	cgrp_id = task->cgroups->dfl_cgrp->kn.id;
	bpf_rcu_read_unlock();

In the first example, it's not great that we go from task pointer to cgroup
pointer to ID and then back to acquired cgroup pointer. I wonder whether
what we really want is to support something like the following:

	bpf_rcu_read_lock();
	cgrp = bpf_cgroup_tryget(task->cgroups->dfl_cgrp);
	bpf_rcu_read_unlock();

What do you think?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-03-20 14:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-19  5:03 [PATCH V3 bpf-next 1/2] bpf: add bpf_task_get_cgroup kfunc Jose Fernandez
2024-03-19  5:03 ` [PATCH V3 bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: add selftest for bpf_task_get_cgroup Jose Fernandez
2024-03-19 13:00   ` Jiri Olsa
2024-03-20  6:03 ` [PATCH V3 bpf-next 1/2] bpf: add bpf_task_get_cgroup kfunc Alexei Starovoitov
2024-03-20 14:41 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2024-03-20 23:05   ` Alexei Starovoitov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Zfr1jQ6W6yaLsHID@mtj.duckdns.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=josef@netflix.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=sdf@google.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=tycho@tycho.pizza \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox