public inbox for linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	"Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
	Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>,
	angquan yu <angquan21@gmail.com>,
	kernel@collabora.com, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] selftests: x86: skip the tests if prerequisites aren't fulfilled
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2024 08:36:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZgZvaUbZIr0qpxK5@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1d6418a3-67eb-4a39-891a-7d653a26f1fc@linuxfoundation.org>


* Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> On 3/27/24 05:17, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
> > Skip instead of failing when prerequisite conditions aren't fulfilled,
> > such as invalid xstate values etc. This patch would make the tests show
> > as skip when run by:
> >    make -C tools/testing/selftests/ TARGETS=x86 run_tests
> > 
> >    ...
> >    # timeout set to 45
> >    # selftests: x86: amx_64
> >    # # xstate cpuid: invalid tile data size/offset: 0/0
> >    ok 42 selftests: x86: amx_64 # SKIP
> >    # timeout set to 45
> >    # selftests: x86: lam_64
> >    # # Unsupported LAM feature!
> >    ok 43 selftests: x86: lam_64 # SKIP
> >    ...
> > 
> > In amx test, Move away from check_cpuid_xsave() and start using
> > arch_prctl() to find out if amx support is present or not. In the
> > kernels where amx isn't present, arch_prctl returns -EINVAL. Hence it is
> > backward compatible.
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Chang S. Bae <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
> > Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com>
> > ---
> > Changes since v2:
> > - Update the changelog
> > 
> 
> Thank you - applied to linux-kselftest next for 6.10-rc1

Please don't, I've applied the patch to tip:x86/cpu with a tidied up 
changelog.

Thanks,

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-29  7:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-27 11:17 [PATCH v3] selftests: x86: skip the tests if prerequisites aren't fulfilled Muhammad Usama Anjum
2024-03-28 18:42 ` Shuah Khan
2024-03-29  7:36   ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2024-03-29 15:01     ` Shuah Khan
2024-03-30 11:08       ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZgZvaUbZIr0qpxK5@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=angquan21@gmail.com \
    --cc=binbin.wu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
    --cc=kernel@collabora.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=usama.anjum@collabora.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox