Linux Kernel Selftest development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
To: Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>
Cc: <sagis@google.com>, <linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
	<afranji@google.com>, <erdemaktas@google.com>,
	<isaku.yamahata@intel.com>, <seanjc@google.com>,
	<pbonzini@redhat.com>, <shuah@kernel.org>, <pgonda@google.com>,
	<haibo1.xu@intel.com>, <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com>,
	<vannapurve@google.com>, <runanwang@google.com>,
	<vipinsh@google.com>, <jmattson@google.com>,
	<dmatlack@google.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<kvm@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 09/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add report_fatal_error test
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 19:57:50 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZhkhvtijbhxKKAEk@yzhao56-desk.sh.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <diqzwmp3ji0r.fsf@ctop-sg.c.googlers.com>

On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 04:56:36AM +0000, Ackerley Tng wrote:
> Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com> writes:
> 
> > ...
> >> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/tdx/test_util.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/tdx/test_util.h
> >> index b570b6d978ff..6d69921136bd 100644
> >> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/tdx/test_util.h
> >> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/tdx/test_util.h
> >> @@ -49,4 +49,23 @@ bool is_tdx_enabled(void);
> >>   */
> >>  void tdx_test_success(void);
> >>  
> >> +/**
> >> + * Report an error with @error_code to userspace.
> >> + *
> >> + * Return value from tdg_vp_vmcall_report_fatal_error is ignored since execution
> >> + * is not expected to continue beyond this point.
> >> + */
> >> +void tdx_test_fatal(uint64_t error_code);
> >> +
> >> +/**
> >> + * Report an error with @error_code to userspace.
> >> + *
> >> + * @data_gpa may point to an optional shared guest memory holding the error
> >> + * string.
> >> + *
> >> + * Return value from tdg_vp_vmcall_report_fatal_error is ignored since execution
> >> + * is not expected to continue beyond this point.
> >> + */
> >> +void tdx_test_fatal_with_data(uint64_t error_code, uint64_t data_gpa);
> > I found nowhere is using "data_gpa" as a gpa, even in patch 23, it's
> > usage is to pass a line number ("tdx_test_fatal_with_data(ret, __LINE__)").
> >
> >
> 
> This function tdx_test_fatal_with_data() is meant to provide a generic
> interface for TDX tests to use TDG.VP.VMCALL<ReportFatalError>, and so
> the parameters of tdx_test_fatal_with_data() generically allow error_code and
> data_gpa to be specified.
> 
> The tests just happen to use the data_gpa parameter to pass __LINE__ to
> the host VMM, but other tests in future that use the
> tdx_test_fatal_with_data() function in the TDX testing library could
> actually pass a GPA through using data_gpa.
> 
> >>  #endif // SELFTEST_TDX_TEST_UTIL_H
> >> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/tdx/tdx.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/tdx/tdx.c
> >> index c2414523487a..b854c3aa34ff 100644
> >> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/tdx/tdx.c
> >> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/tdx/tdx.c
> >> @@ -1,8 +1,31 @@
> >>  // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> >>  
> >> +#include <string.h>
> >> +
> >>  #include "tdx/tdcall.h"
> >>  #include "tdx/tdx.h"
> >>  
> >> +void handle_userspace_tdg_vp_vmcall_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> >> +{
> >> +	struct kvm_tdx_vmcall *vmcall_info = &vcpu->run->tdx.u.vmcall;
> >> +	uint64_t vmcall_subfunction = vmcall_info->subfunction;
> >> +
> >> +	switch (vmcall_subfunction) {
> >> +	case TDG_VP_VMCALL_REPORT_FATAL_ERROR:
> >> +		vcpu->run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_SYSTEM_EVENT;
> >> +		vcpu->run->system_event.ndata = 3;
> >> +		vcpu->run->system_event.data[0] =
> >> +			TDG_VP_VMCALL_REPORT_FATAL_ERROR;
> >> +		vcpu->run->system_event.data[1] = vmcall_info->in_r12;
> >> +		vcpu->run->system_event.data[2] = vmcall_info->in_r13;
> >> +		vmcall_info->status_code = 0;
> >> +		break;
> >> +	default:
> >> +		TEST_FAIL("TD VMCALL subfunction %lu is unsupported.\n",
> >> +			  vmcall_subfunction);
> >> +	}
> >> +}
> >> +
> >>  uint64_t tdg_vp_vmcall_instruction_io(uint64_t port, uint64_t size,
> >>  				      uint64_t write, uint64_t *data)
> >>  {
> >> @@ -25,3 +48,19 @@ uint64_t tdg_vp_vmcall_instruction_io(uint64_t port, uint64_t size,
> >>  
> >>  	return ret;
> >>  }
> >> +
> >> +void tdg_vp_vmcall_report_fatal_error(uint64_t error_code, uint64_t data_gpa)
> >> +{
> >> +	struct tdx_hypercall_args args;
> >> +
> >> +	memset(&args, 0, sizeof(struct tdx_hypercall_args));
> >> +
> >> +	if (data_gpa)
> >> +		error_code |= 0x8000000000000000;
> >> 
> > So, why this error_code needs to set bit 63?
> >
> >
> 
> The Intel GHCI Spec says in R12, bit 63 is set if the GPA is valid. As a
But above "__LINE__" is obviously not a valid GPA.

Do you think it's better to check "data_gpa" is with shared bit on and
aligned in 4K before setting bit 63?

> generic TDX testing library function, this check allows the user to use
> tdg_vp_vmcall_report_fatal_error() with error_code and data_gpa and not
> worry about setting bit 63 before calling
> tdg_vp_vmcall_report_fatal_error(), though if the user set bit 63 before
> that, there is no issue.
> 
> >> +	args.r11 = TDG_VP_VMCALL_REPORT_FATAL_ERROR;
> >> +	args.r12 = error_code;
> >> +	args.r13 = data_gpa;
> >> +
> >> +	__tdx_hypercall(&args, 0);
> >> +}
> 
> >> <snip>
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-12 11:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 109+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-12 20:46 [RFC PATCH v5 00/29] TDX KVM selftests Sagi Shahar
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 01/29] KVM: selftests: Add function to allow one-to-one GVA to GPA mappings Sagi Shahar
2024-02-21  1:43   ` Binbin Wu
2024-07-23 19:55     ` Sagi Shahar
2024-03-21 22:29   ` Zhang, Dongsheng X
2024-07-23 19:56     ` Sagi Shahar
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 02/29] KVM: selftests: Expose function that sets up sregs based on VM's mode Sagi Shahar
2024-02-21  2:18   ` Binbin Wu
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 03/29] KVM: selftests: Store initial stack address in struct kvm_vcpu Sagi Shahar
2024-02-21  2:29   ` Binbin Wu
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 04/29] KVM: selftests: Refactor steps in vCPU descriptor table initialization Sagi Shahar
2024-02-21  5:43   ` Binbin Wu
2024-07-23 21:25     ` Sagi Shahar
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 05/29] KVM: selftests: Add helper functions to create TDX VMs Sagi Shahar
2024-02-22  9:24   ` Yan Zhao
2024-02-28 16:19   ` Binbin Wu
2024-03-21 22:54   ` Zhang, Dongsheng X
2024-04-12  5:34     ` Ackerley Tng
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 06/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Use KVM_TDX_CAPABILITIES to validate TDs' attribute configuration Sagi Shahar
2024-02-29  8:31   ` Binbin Wu
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 07/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Update load_td_memory_region for VM memory backed by guest memfd Sagi Shahar
2024-02-22  9:19   ` Yan Zhao
2024-07-24 16:42     ` Ackerley Tng
2024-07-25 18:19       ` Ackerley Tng
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 08/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add TDX lifecycle test Sagi Shahar
2024-02-23  1:55   ` Chen Yu
2024-03-01  4:58   ` Yan Zhao
2024-03-01  7:36   ` Yan Zhao
2024-03-21 23:20   ` Zhang, Dongsheng X
2024-04-12  4:42     ` Ackerley Tng
2024-03-22 21:33   ` Chen, Zide
2024-07-25 19:52     ` Sagi Shahar
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 09/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add report_fatal_error test Sagi Shahar
2024-02-29 12:31   ` Binbin Wu
2024-03-01  6:52   ` Binbin Wu
2024-07-25 20:37     ` Sagi Shahar
2024-03-01 12:09   ` Yan Zhao
2024-04-12  4:56     ` Ackerley Tng
2024-04-12 11:57       ` Yan Zhao [this message]
2024-04-15  8:05         ` Ackerley Tng
2024-04-15 10:09           ` Yan Zhao
2024-04-16 18:50             ` Sean Christopherson
2024-04-17 22:41               ` Yan Zhao
2024-04-22 21:23                 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-07-28 11:16                   ` Binbin Wu
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 10/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Adding test case for TDX port IO Sagi Shahar
2024-02-29 13:20   ` Binbin Wu
2024-03-04  2:19   ` Yan Zhao
2024-03-04  9:16     ` Binbin Wu
2024-03-04  9:18       ` Yan Zhao
2024-07-25 22:35     ` Sagi Shahar
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 11/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add basic TDX CPUID test Sagi Shahar
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 12/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add basic get_td_vmcall_info test Sagi Shahar
2024-03-01  6:03   ` Binbin Wu
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 13/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add TDX IO writes test Sagi Shahar
2024-03-01  6:55   ` Binbin Wu
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 14/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add TDX IO reads test Sagi Shahar
2024-03-01  8:22   ` Binbin Wu
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 15/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add TDX MSR read/write tests Sagi Shahar
2024-03-01 12:00   ` Binbin Wu
2024-03-01 12:09     ` Binbin Wu
2024-03-05  0:22   ` Yan Zhao
2024-03-21 23:40   ` Zhang, Dongsheng X
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 16/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add TDX HLT exit test Sagi Shahar
2024-03-02  7:31   ` Binbin Wu
2024-03-05  5:40     ` Yan Zhao
2024-07-27 23:23       ` Sagi Shahar
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 17/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add TDX MMIO reads test Sagi Shahar
2024-03-05  7:09   ` Yan Zhao
2024-03-21 23:45   ` Zhang, Dongsheng X
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 18/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add TDX MMIO writes test Sagi Shahar
2024-03-02  7:58   ` Binbin Wu
2024-03-05  8:58   ` Yan Zhao
2024-07-30 19:03     ` Sagi Shahar
2024-03-21 23:46   ` Zhang, Dongsheng X
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 19/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add TDX CPUID TDVMCALL test Sagi Shahar
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 20/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Verify the behavior when host consumes a TD private memory Sagi Shahar
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 21/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add TDG.VP.INFO test Sagi Shahar
2024-03-06  4:50   ` Yan Zhao
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 22/29] KVM: selftests: Add functions to allow mapping as shared Sagi Shahar
2024-03-05 11:09   ` Yan Zhao
     [not found]   ` <DS7PR11MB7886BD37E5E56DAB9A0087A3F6292@DS7PR11MB7886.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
2024-03-16  6:24     ` Chen, Zide
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 23/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add shared memory test Sagi Shahar
2024-03-01 12:02   ` Yan Zhao
2024-03-06  1:36     ` Yan Zhao
2024-03-06  1:20   ` Yan Zhao
     [not found]   ` <DS7PR11MB7886AA5F8A19CDFCB5566B0EF6292@DS7PR11MB7886.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
2024-03-16  6:24     ` Chen, Zide
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 24/29] KVM: selftests: Expose _vm_vaddr_alloc Sagi Shahar
2024-03-04  9:55   ` Binbin Wu
2024-03-06  1:49   ` Yan Zhao
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 25/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add support for TDG.MEM.PAGE.ACCEPT Sagi Shahar
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 26/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add support for TDG.VP.VEINFO.GET Sagi Shahar
2024-03-04 13:56   ` Binbin Wu
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 27/29] KVM: selftests: Propagate KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT to userspace Sagi Shahar
     [not found]   ` <DS7PR11MB78860170A5FD77253573BC09F6292@DS7PR11MB7886.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
2024-03-14 21:46     ` Chen, Zide
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 28/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add TDX UPM selftest Sagi Shahar
2024-03-05  4:57   ` Binbin Wu
2024-03-06  8:54   ` Yan Zhao
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 29/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add TDX UPM selftests for implicit conversion Sagi Shahar
2024-06-05 18:38 ` [RFC PATCH v5 00/29] TDX KVM selftests Verma, Vishal L
2024-06-05 20:10   ` Sagi Shahar
2024-06-05 20:15     ` Verma, Vishal L
2024-06-05 20:18       ` Verma, Vishal L
2024-06-05 20:42         ` Sagi Shahar
2024-06-05 20:56           ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-06-05 21:34             ` Sagi Shahar
2024-06-05 21:44               ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-06-21  2:51                 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-06-21 20:52                   ` Sagi Shahar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZhkhvtijbhxKKAEk@yzhao56-desk.sh.intel.com \
    --to=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
    --cc=ackerleytng@google.com \
    --cc=afranji@google.com \
    --cc=chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=erdemaktas@google.com \
    --cc=haibo1.xu@intel.com \
    --cc=isaku.yamahata@intel.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=pgonda@google.com \
    --cc=runanwang@google.com \
    --cc=sagis@google.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=vannapurve@google.com \
    --cc=vipinsh@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox